CALL FOR PAPERS
Issue 60 / (Re)thinking the Anthropocene: new challenges for International Relations?
Publication Date: February 2026
The call for papers of issue 61 of the journal aims to contribute to the global discussion of the concept of the Anthropocene in International Relations. The idea of the Anthropocene has become a relevant discursive concept in many contexts. Coined in the field of geology during the 2000s, it is a term that has expanded and popularized enormously in recent years, mainly as a rhetorical instrument with which to refer to —and raise awareness of— the incidence of the serious ecosocial crisis that the planet Earth as a whole is facing nowadays.
In social sciences, the term has been —and is being— widely explored and debated, to the point that it has become a key to understanding what has been called the “post-anthropocentric turn”. This is an onto-epistemological paradigm shift towards a conception of the world away from the anthropocentrism characteristic of Western humanism; something that Bruno Latour described as a “profound mutation of our relationship with the world”. This shift proposes the need to rethink existing structures, analytical concepts and paradigms in order to respond adequately to contemporary ecosocial challenges.
The notion of the Anthropocene has functioned, in the social sciences, as a catalyst through which to vindicate the need to break with the ontological dualism that predominates in the dominant Western collective consciousness —that inherited from rationalist modernity, and which distinguishes and hierarchizes the notions of nature/society, ideas/reality, theory/practice, among other binomials—. The term is frequently adopted as an analytical tool in its own right, characterized by its transformative potential at the onto-epistemological level. The concept is claimed as a tool to consolidate a new paradigm far removed from the classical anthropocentrism of International Relations. To speak of the Anthropocene has constituted not only an exercise in (re)designating the concrete geohistorical momentum that we inhabit, but its use has been claimed, from posthumanist and neo-materialist schools, as an opportunity to redefine the discipline as a whole, from its most basic foundations, that is, by transforming how we understand and approach our relationship with the reality and realities we study —ontology and epistemology—. The issue of the emerging Anthropocene is claimed as an opportunity to consolidate a new post anthropocentric paradigm of International Relations.
On the other hand, also from within and outside this discipline, efforts have been made to introduce these debates and attempt to deconstruct the term, analyzing the normative and philosophical implications it reproduces. Some authors question its viability as an analytical category on the grounds that it is an anthropocentric, androcentric and western centric term; that is, that it makes invisible the heterogeneity of human societies and their asymmetrical contribution to the ecological crisis, as well as the complexity of the ecosocial phenomena linked to climate change. It is therefore a controversial concept, with an important onto-epistemological and political-normative meaning, which is constantly (re)signified depending on the context in which it is used.
However, the discussion around this concept does not cover the great diversity of proposals that advocate the creation and consolidation of other ways of understanding and relating to the world outside the hegemonic rationalist and hierarchical consciousness. From the 1970s and 1980s, and up to the present day, numerous ecofeminist women authors have made important contributions to ethics, philosophy, critical theory, literary criticism and various social currents of ecological thought. They include Carolyn Merchant, Val Plumwood, Maria Mies, Ariel Salleh, Stacy Alaimo, Greta Gaard, among many others, and were pioneers in critiquing the dualistic, individualistic and rationalistic conception of social reality inherited from the dominant Western political philosophy. They also introduced important ideas such as the cosmological approach, the idea of “sustainability of life”, among other proposals, to analyze the interrelations between the human and the more-than-human; between social constructions, materiality and corporeity, to name only a few. Ecofeminist thought and developments have been key to articulating an effective and radical critique of Western anthropocentric and androcentric epistemologies, as well as to promoting real and effective intersectionality in the approach to social studies. However, their proposals did not need to rely on the incidence of a new geological era to propose a shift towards inclusivity and transversality in our approaches to ecosocial realities.
This new Call for Papers seeks to collect contributions that participate in this rich debate, promoting critical reflection on this and other related analytical categories. The aim of this Issue of the journal Relaciones Internacionales will be to contribute to the global discussion on the Anthropocene, the “post-anthropocentric turn” and the global ecosocial crisis by publishing research that contributes to promoting critical reflection on this and other related analytical categories.
Therefore, priority will be given to those contributions that address issues related to all of the above, from a critical point of view, understood in Coxian terms. We are looking for texts that provide critical theoretical support to the discussion by analyzing, discussing or deepening the following dimensions, categories and concepts:
- Conceptual developments in the ecosocial crisis from the theory of International Relations. a) Theoretical approaches to the concept of the Anthropocene itself, from critical positions and/or arguments in its support; b) Alternative visions and/or proposals to this concept, or defense of other existing concepts, i.e.: Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Occidentalocene, among others; How can these different notions coexist in relation to the ecosocial crisis?
- Reflections on how the study of the concept of the Anthropocene/Capitalocene/etc. has transformed (or not) the discipline of International Relations; how this development affects the dilution of disciplinary boundaries in social sciences; how it affects the transformation or rupture with the classical conceptualizations of the discipline —statist centrism, anthropocentrism, western centrism, etc.—
- Methodological proposals for the effective development of situational analysis that address the ecosocial reality from a post anthropocentric paradigm.
- Analytical proposals, from within and outside the discipline of International Relations —sociology, political ecology, ecological humanities, among others— that seek to engage in dialogue or broaden existing visions of the “post-anthropocentric turn” in social sciences.
Although these lines of research are prioritized, the acceptance of contributions will not be limited to the previously set out areas.
Issue 61 of Relaciones Internacionales will be published in February 2026; the Editorial Team of the journal and the Coordination of the issue have established the following dates:
DUE DATE
SUBMISSION OF ARTICLES
The full document of the article must conform wholly and meticulously to the Style Manual of the journal. You can obtain our template for authors by clicking here (in Spanish). The submission stage ends on 15th September 2025 (up to and including).
The submission of the article will be made on the web-page of the journal through the management platforms OJS (Open Journal System). It is essential that the authors —all of them in the event that there is more than one— are registered by completing the requested data on the platform registration page with the most up-to-date information:
https://revistas.uam.es/relacionesinternacionales
EVALUATION PROCESS
Once the article is submitted correctly through the website the double-blind evaluation process The decision process will take between three and six months, depending on the case: this may include the return of the text to its author(s) for the revision or correction of changes and suggestions made by the anonymous reviewers. During the evaluation process, the reviewers will be responsible for certifying the quality of the work of the authors, as well as the appropriateness of the final texts for the topics proposed in the call for papers.
- PLEASE NOTE: suggestions by the authors of possible reviewers for the evaluation of their texts are permitted. With the text of your proposal, you can send us by email the names of academics with extensive knowledge of the aspects dealt with in your work so that- if the coordination considers it appropriate- these people can be contacted as blind reviewers.
DEFINITIVE ACCEPTANCE
Throughout the evaluation process (between September-December), those authors whose text receives the complete approval of the assigned reviewers will be notified of the definitive acceptance of their article, at which time they can have the absolute certainty that the paper will be published in the journal. That the article is published in Issue 61 as planned – and not in a later issue – is subject to the complete conformity of the text to the instructions indicated in the Style Manual of the journal, or other contingencies that will be duly communicated to the authors.
EDITING PROCESS
During the month of January, the journal will proceed to the definitive editing of the text, to be published in February. The complete and careful compliance with the rules stated in the Style Manual of the journal is understood to be the responsibility of the authors in order to avoid delays that could lead to postponements of the publication of your article to a later issue.
PUBLICATION OF THE VOLUME
Throughout the month of February 2026 the 61st issue of the journal Relaciones Internacionales, with the title “(Re)thinking the Anthropocene: new challenges for International Relations?”, will be published in digital format, online, open access and free. All the articles that have fulfilled the requirements of the stages indicated above will be included.
LANGUAGES
Proposals in Spanish, English, Portuguese, and French will be accepted. However, the articles must be translated to Spanish for publication. Whenever possible, the authors themselves will submit the articles translated into Spanish; the journal does not guarantee the translation of all texts.
OTHER INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS:
It is fundamental that the authors consult the Style Manual to get to know in detail the editing and evaluation requirements for publication in the journal. Moreover, the OJS system of the journal website allows for online tracking of all the administration processes and the state of the text.
Notification of copyright: the authors who publish in Relaciones Internacionales accept the following terms:
- The authors retain copyright and guarantee the right of first publication of the work to the journal, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons License Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
- The authors will be able to make other non-exclusive licence agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., deposited in an electronic institutional archive or published in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- It is permitted and recommended that the authors circulate their work through the internet (e.g., in electronic institutional archives or on their webpage) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase the citations of the published work.
- The authors are responsible for obtaining the appropriate permissions to reproduce material (text, images or graphs) from other publications and for citing their origins correctly.
- Relaciones Internacionales does not charge the authors any fees for the presentation, submission, or publication of the articles.
ISSUE COORDINATED BY
Rebeca GIMÉNEZ GONZÁLEZ – rebeca.gimenez@uam.es
Itziar RUIZ-GIMÉNEZ ARRIETA – Itziar.ruiz-gimenez@uam.es