Active Methodologies for Sustainable Development in Teacher Education. Bibliometric Analysis
Keywords:
Active methodologies, Sustainability, Higher education, Active learning, Teacher training
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
One of the current challenges of university education is sustainability and social justice. From the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), to achieve these challenges is to take into account the socio-economic and cultural changes. In this sense, university teacher training must be the key between these two variables. To this end, it is necessary to commit to the use of active teaching methodologies that contain a sustainable curriculum and reflect social justice. The aim of this research is to carry out a bibliometric study of the scientific production related to curricular sustainability and the use of active methodologies in the initial teacher training process. This study is descriptive and cross-sectional-retrospective in nature, and also examines the scientific production in this field. One of the most important results shows a growing research productivity in recent years. This shows the importance of these issues among the scientific community, with Spain being the most prolific country in this field of study. This situation has generated a renewed impetus in research on this subject, with a significant and increasing number of publications in recent years
Downloads
References
Acosta Castellanos, P. M. y Queiruga-Dios, A. (2022). From environmental education to education for sustainable development in higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(3), 622-644. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-04-2021-0167
Albareda-Tiana, S., García-González, E., Jiménez-Fontana, R. y Solís-Espallargas, C. (2019). Implementing pedagogical approaches for ESD in initial teacher training at Spanish universities. Sustainability, 11(18), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184927
Alcalá del Olmo-Fernández, M. J., Rodríguez-Jiménez, C., Santos-Villalba, M. J. y Gómez-García, G. (2021). Educar para el desarrollo sostenible en el contexto universitario: Un análisis bibliométrico. Formación Universitaria, 14(3), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062021000300085
Alcalá del Olmo-Fernández, M. J., Santos Villalba, M. J., Leyva, J. J. y Matas, A. (2020). Sostenibilidad curricular: Una mirada desde las aportaciones del profesorado de la Universidad de Málaga. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, 9(2), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2020.9.2.0
Aleixo, A. M., Leal, S. y Miranda Azeiteiro, U. (2018). Conceptualization of sustainable higher education institutions, roles, barriers, and challenges for sustainability: An exploratory study in Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1664-1673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.010
Alonso-Sáez, I. y Berasategi-Sancho, N. (2017). The integrated curriculum, university teacher identity and teaching culture: The effects of an interdisciplinary activity. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(2), 127-134. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.7.235
Archambault, E. y Larivière, N. (2011). Los límites de la bibliometría en el análisis de la literatura de ciencias sociales y humanidades. En UNESCO (Ed.), Informar sobre las ciencias sociales en el mundo. Las brechas del conocimiento (pp. 263-267). UNESCO.
Barba-Martín, R. A. y Hortigu?ela-Alcalá, D. (2022). Presentación. Mecanismos, instrumentos y prácticas para fomentar la participación del alumnado en su propia evaluación. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 15(1), 7-8. https://doi.org/10.15366/riee2022.15.1
Benavides-Sánchez, E.P., Moya-Clemente, I. y Ribes-Giner, G. (2021). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainable development goals: A bibliometric analysis. Tec Empresarial, 16(1), 101-122. https://doi.org/10.18845/te.v16i1.5994
Bugallo-Rodríguez, A. y Vega-Marcote, P. (2020). Circular economy, sustainability and teacher training in a higher education institution. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(7), 1351-1366. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2020-0049
Carreño, I. G. (2020). Importance of active methodologies in the times of Covid-19: Bibliometric analysis. En VVAA. (Orgs.), Handbook of the Virtual Congress GKA EDU2020 about Education and Learning (p. 136-142). EAGORA.
Cebrián, G., Junyent, M. y Mulá, I. (2020). Competencies in education for sustainable development: Emerging teaching and research developments. Sustainability, 12(579), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1202059
Comisión Europea. (2021). Education and training monitor 2021: Strategic framework for European cooperation in education training towards the European Education Area and beyond (2021–2030). Publication Office of the European Union.
Cortés Vargas, D. (2007). Medir la producción científica de los investigadores universitarios: La bibliometría y sus límites. Revista de la Educación Superior, 2(142), 43-65.
Crisol-Moya E., Romero-López, M. A. y Caurcel-Cara, M. J. (2020). Active methodologies in higher education: Perception and opinion as evaluated by professors and their students in the teaching-Learning process. Frontiers Psychology, 11, art. 1703. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01703
CRUE. (2021). Universidad 2030: Propuesta para el debate. CRUE.
Diem, A. y Wolter, S. (2013). The use of bibliometrics to measure research performance in education sciences. Research in Higher Education, 54(1), 86-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9264-5
Duque, P. y Cervantes-Cervantes, L. S. (2019). Responsabilidad social universitaria: Una revisio?n sistema?tica y ana?lisis bibliome?trico. Estudios Gerenciales, 35(153), 451-464. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2019.153.3389
Espino-Román, P., Olaguez-Torres, E. y Davizon-Castillo, Y. A. (2015). Análisis de la percepción del medio ambiente de los estudiantes de ingeniería en mecatrónica. Formación Universitaria, 8(4), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062015000400006
Fernández-Terol, L. y Domingo, J. (2021). Percepción docente sobre la transición del aula tradicional al aprendizaje por proyectos para involucrar al estudiante. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 19(4), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2021.19.4.011
Garrote Rojas, D., Jiménez-Fernández, S. y Martínez-Heredia, N. (2019). Cooperative work as a training tool for university students. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 17(3), 41-58.
Gómez-Hurtado, I., García-Rodríguez, M. P., González Falcón, I. y Coronel Llamas, J. M. (2020). Adaptación de las metodologías activas en la educación universitaria en tiempos de pandemia. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, 9(3e), 415-433. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2020.9.3.022
Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Higueras-Rodríguez, L. y Medina-García, M. (2020). Developing a regression model of cooperative learning methodology in pre-service teacher education: A sustainable path for transition to teaching profession. Sustainability, 12(6), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062215
Hernández-Barco, M., Sánchez-Martín, J. y Corbacho-Cuello, I. (2021). Emotional performance of a low-cost eco-friendly project based learning methodology for science education: An approach in prospective teachers. Sustainability, 13(6), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063385
Larenas San Martín, M. E. (2016). La lengua inglesa y su importancia en la investigación en enfermería. Ciencia y Enfermería, 22(1), 7-9. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95532016000100001
Larrán Jorge, M. y Andrades Peña, F. J. (2017). Analyzing the literature on university social responsibility: A review of selected higher education journals. Higher Education Quarterly, 71(4), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12122
Losada, J. L. y Manolov, R. (2015). The process of basic training, applied training, maintaining the performance of an observer. Quality & Quantity, 49(1), 229-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-9989-7
Martínez Lirola, M. (2018). La enseñanza de la justicia ambiental en el marco de la educación para el desarrollo sostenible en la universidad. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, 7(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2018.7.1.003
Moed, H. y Glänzel, W. (2005). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A. y PRISMA-P Group (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
OCDE. (2021). Education at a glance 2021: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en.
OEI. (2021). Educación superior, productividad y competitividad en Iberoamérica. OEI.
ONU. (2019). Transformar nuestro mundo: La Agenda 2030 para el desarrollo sostenible. ONU.
Payne, P. G. (2015). Critical curriculum theory and slow ecopedagogical activism. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 31(2), 165-193. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2015.32
Pegalajar-Palomino M. C., Burgos-García, A. y Martínez-Valdivia, E. (2021). What does education for sustainable development offer in initial teacher training? A systematic review. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 23(1), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0008
Pegalajar Palomino, M. C., Burgos García, A. y Martínez Valdivia, E. (2022). educación para el desarrollo sostenible y responsabilidad social: Claves en la formación inicial del docente desde una revisión sistemática. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 40(2), 421-437. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.458301
Pérez Gómez, A. I. y Soto Gómez, E. (2021). Aprender juntos a vivir y explorar la complejidad. Nuevos marcos pedagógicos de interpretación y acción. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 19(4), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2021.19.4.001
Repiso, R., Merino-Arribas, A. y Cabezas-Clavijo, A. (2021). El año que nos volvimos insostenibles: Análisis de la producción española en Sustainability (2020). Profesional de la Información, 30(4), art 9. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.09
Reyes-González, L., González-Brambilla, C. N. y Veloso, F. (2016). Using co-authorship and citation analysis to identify research groups: a new way to assess performance. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1171-1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2029-8
Roldán-Arcos, S., Pérez Martín, J. M. y Esquivel-Martin, T. (2022). Educación para la justicia ambiental: ¿Qué propuestas se están realizando? Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, 11(2), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2022.11.2.001
Rosado-Castellano, F. y Flores-Rodríguez, C. (2023). Justicia social y desarrollo sostenible en la legislación educativa española. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, 12(1), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2023.12.1.007
Roysen, R. y Cruz, T. C. (2020). Educating for transitions: Ecovillages as transdisciplinary sustainability "classrooms". International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(5), 977-992. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2020-0009
Salido López, P. (2020). Metodologías activas en la formación inicial de docentes: Aprendizaje basado en proyectos (ABP) y educación artística. Profesorado, 24(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i2.13565
Santaolalla, E. Urosa, B., Martín, O., Verde, A. y Díaz, T. (2020). Interdisciplinarity in teacher education: Evaluation of the effectiveness of an educational innovation project. Sustainability, 12(17), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176748
Segura-Robles, A., Parra-González, M. E. y Gallardo-Vigil, M. (2020). Bibliometric and collaborative network analysis on Active Methodologies in Education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.575
Sinkovics, N. (2016). Enhancing the foundations for theorising through bibliometric mapping. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 327-350. https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-10-2014-0341
Tejedor, G., Segalàs, J., Barrón, A., Fernández-Morilla, M., Fuertes, M. T., Ruiz-Morales, J., Gutiérrez, I., García-González, E., Aramburuzabala, P., y Hernández, A. (2019). Didactic strategies to promote competencies in sustainability. Sustainability, 11(7), 2086-2106. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072086
Todeschini, R. y Baccini, A. (2016). Handbook of bibliometric indicators: Quantitative tools for studying and evaluating research. Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527681969
Tomas, L., Evans, N., Doyle, T. y Skamp, K. (2019). Are first year students ready for a flipped classroom? A case for a flipped learning continuum. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(5), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0135-4
Triviño-Cabrera, L., Chaves-Guerrero, E. I. y Alejo-Lozano, L. (2021). The figure of the teacher-prosumer for the development of an innovative, sustainable, and committed education in times of covid-19. Sustainability, 13, 1128-1146. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031128
Yllana-Prieto F., Jeong, J. S. y González-Gómez, D. (2021). An online-based edu-escape room: a comparison study of a multidimensional domain of PSTs with flipped sustainability-STEM contents. Sustainability, 13, 1032-1050. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031032