Distributed Leadership for Educational Improvement: A Social Network Analysis in Chilean High Schools’ Departments
Keywords:
Leadership, School improvement, Social network analysis, Secondary schools, Chile.Abstract
Educational improvement involves interactions among individuals in school contexts, which entails leadership roles and their potential distribution. In this exploratory-descriptive study we use Social Network Analysis (SNA) with a sample of three secondary schools in Chile to examine the relationships between members of the Language and Mathematics departments, identifying those who play leadership roles for educational improvement processes. Findings show that patterns of interactions among teachers varied by type of collaborative action, where in some schools the interactions among teachers are scarce between and within the departments analyzed, and in others they are more intense and frequent. Whereas the role of department heads is important, in some cases teachers who do not have that position may even have a more prominent role in influencing school improvement processes. Findings lead us to conclude that SNA is a useful technique for depicting a school’s social capital, enabling the identification of aspects in need of attention to increase distributed leadership as leverage for school improvement.
Downloads
References
Araya, F. (2015). Rediseño del rol y función del jefe de departamento de asignatura. Estudio de caso (Tesis de maestría). Santiago de Chile: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
Aubrey-Hopkins, J. y James, C. (2002). Improving practice in subject departments: The experience of secondary school subject leaders in Wales. School Leadership and Management, 22(3), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243022000020426
Barry, D. (1991). Managing the bossless team: Lessons in distributed leadership. Organisational Dynamics, 20(1), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(91)90081-J
Bellei, C., Valenzuela, J., Vanni, X. y Contreras, D. (2014). Lo aprendí en la escuela. ¿Cómo se logran procesos de mejoramiento escolar? Santiago de Chile: LOM.
Bennett, N. (1995). Managing professional teachers: Middle management in primary and secondary schools. Londres: Paul Chapman.
Bolívar, A. (2014). Building school capacity: Shared leadership and professional learning communities. A research proposal. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 2(2), 147-175.
Borgatti, S. P. y Everett, M. G. (2006). A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Social Networks, 28, 466-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.11.005
Bush, T., Yoon, A. y Ng, M. (2019). Distributed leadership and the Malaysia education blueprint enactment in a highly centralised context. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(3), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2018-0206
Bush, T. (2003). Theories of educational leadership and management. Londres: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X0303102100
Busher, H., Harris, A. y Wise, C. (2001). Subject leadership and school improvement. Londres: Paul Chapman.
Camburn, E., Rowan, B. y Taylor, J. E. (2003). Distributed leadership in schools: The case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 347-373. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025004347
Cortez, M. y Zoro, B. (2016). El rol estratégico de los liderazgos medios al interior de las escuelas para la mejora escolar: una mirada desde la literatura internacional. Recuperado de https://www.lidereseducativos.cl/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/NT-8.pdf
Day, C. y Harris, A. (2002). Teacher leadership, reflective practice, and school improvement. En K. Leithwood (Coord.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 957-955). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0375-9_32
Daly, A. J. (2010). Social network theory and educational change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Daly, A. J., Moolenaar, N. M., Bolivar, J. M. y Burke, P. (2010). Relationships in reform: The role of teachers' social networks. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(3), 359-391. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231011041062
De Lima, J. A. (2008). Department networks and distributed leadership in schools. School Leadership and Management, 28(2), 159-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430801969864
Downey, C. (2018). Utilizing social network analysis to identify the structural features of teachers’ knowledge and resource sharing networks within schools. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 22(2), 133-159. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v22i2.7718
Flessa, J. (2009). Educational micropolitics and distributed leadership. Peabody Journal of Education, 84, 331-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619560902973522
Flückiger, B., Lovett, S., Dempster, N. y Brown, S. (2015). Middle leaders: Career pathways and professional learning needs. Leading and Managing, 21(2), 60-74.
Friedkin, N. E. y Slater, M. R. (1994). School leadership and performance: A social network approach. Sociology of Education, 14(2), 139-157. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112701
Frost, D. y Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership: Towards a research agenda. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 479-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122078
Garay, S., Queupil, J. P., Maureira, O., Guiñez, C. y Garay, C. (2019). El liderazgo desde la perspectiva del análisis de redes: Una experiencia en escuelas vulnerables y efectivas de Chile. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 23(2), 169-188. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v23i2.9269
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership. En K. Leithwood (Coord.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 653-696). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0375-9_23
Hadfield, M. y Jopling, M. (2012). How might better network theories support school leadership research? School Leadership & Management, 32(2), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2012.670115
Hallinger, P. y Heck R. H. (2014). Liderazgo colaborativo y mejora escolar: Comprendiendo el impacto sobre la capacidad de la escuela y el aprendizaje de los estudiantes. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 12(4e), 71-88.
Hargreaves, A. (2005). Colaboración y colegialidad artificial (copa reconfortante o cáliz envenenado). En A. Hargreaves (Ed.), Profesorado, cultura y postmodernidad (pp. 210-234). Londres: Ediciones Morata.
Harris, A. (2000). Effective leadership and departmental improvement. Westminster Studies in Education, 23, 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140672000230108
Harris, A. (2001). Department improvement and school improvement: A missing link? British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 477-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120071470
Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility? School Leadership and Management, 23(3), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243032000112801
Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143204039297
Harris, A. (2013). Distributed school leadership: developing tomorrow's leaders. Londres: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203607909
Hopkins, D., Ainscow, M. y West, M. (1994). School improvement in an era of change. Londres: Cassell.
Hoppe, B. y Reinelt, C. (2010). Social network analysis and the evaluation of leadership networks. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(4), 600-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.06.004
Leithwood, K. y Louis, K. S. (1998). Organizational learning in schools: An introduction. En K. Leithwood y K. S. Louis (Eds.), Organizational learning in schools (pp. 1-14). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A. y Hopkins, D. (2006). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. Londres: NCSL.
Little, J. W. (1995). Contested ground: The basis of teacher leadership in two restructuring high schools. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1086/461814
Martínez-Valdivia, E., García-Martínez, I. e Higueras-Rodríguez, M. L. (2018). El liderazgo para la mejora escolar y la justicia social. Un estudio de caso sobre un centro de educación secundaria obligatoria. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 16(1), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2018.16.1.003
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Moolenaar, N. M. (2012). A social network perspective on teacher collaboration in schools: Theory, methodology, and applications. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 7-39. https://doi.org/10.1086/667715
Murillo, F. J. y Krichesky, G. J. (2015). Mejora de la escuela: Medio siglo de lecciones aprendidas. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 13(1), 69-102.
Ogawa, R. T. y Bossert, S. T. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(2), 224-243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X95031002004
Robinson, V. M. (2007). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Australian Council for Educational Leaders, 41, art 5.
Ross, J. y Hannay, L. (2001). Internalizing change capacity in secondary schools through organizational change. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 47(4), 325-340.
Salleh, H. (2017). The attractions and challenges of building teacher leaders. Comunicación presentanda en la Conferencia BELMAS 2017. Stratford-Upon-Avon, Reino Unido.
Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Siskin, L. S. y Little, J. W. (1995). The subjects in question: Departmental organization and the high school. Nueva York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Smith, M., Ceni, A., Milic-Frayling, N., Shneiderman, B., Mendes Rodrigues, E., Leskovec, J. y Dunne, C. (2010). NodeXL: A free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007/2010. Recuperado de http://nodexl.codeplex.com/
Smith, P. S., Trygstad, P. J. y Hayes, M. L. (2018). Social network analysis: A simple but powerful tool for identifying teacher leaders. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(1), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2016.1195016
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Stoll, L. y Fink, D. (1998). The cruising school: The unidentified ineffective school. En L. Stoll y K. Myers (Eds.), No quick fixes (pp. 189-206). Londres: Falmer Press.
Valenzuela, J. P., Bellei, C. y Allende, C. (2016). Measuring systematic long-term trajectories of school effectiveness improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(4), 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2016.1150861
Wakita, K. y Tsurumi, T. (2007). Finding community structure in mega-scale social networks. Recuperado de https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1242572.1242805
Wallace, M. (2002). Modelling distributed leadership and management effectiveness: Primary school senior management teams in England and Wales. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13(2), 163-186. https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.13.2.163.3433
Wang, A. H., Walters, A. M. y Thum, Y. M. (2013). Identifying highly effective urban schools: Comparing two measures of school success. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(5), 517-540. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541311329878
Wasserman, S. y Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
Wenner, J. A. y Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134-171. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316653478