Vol. 22 No. 4 (2024): Teaching Careers and Institutional Contexts that Promote Equity
Articles

Teachers’ Perceptions on the Educational Inclusion of Students with High Abilities

Miryam Martínez-Izaguirre
Bio
Alexander Álvarez-González
Bio
Ioseba Iraurgi Castillo
Bio
Published October 3, 2024

Keywords:

High abilities, Gifted students, Educational inclusion, Compulsory education, Teacher training, Educational intervention
How to Cite
Martínez-Izaguirre, M., Álvarez-González, A., & Iraurgi Castillo, I. (2024). Teachers’ Perceptions on the Educational Inclusion of Students with High Abilities. REICE. Ibero-American Journal on Quality, Effectiveness and Change in Education, 22(4), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2024.22.4.010

Abstract

The educational system must ensure a quality and inclusive education for all students, extending its mission to students with high abilities. Consequently, the current regulatory framework recognizes the specific educational support needs of this group and the necessary personalization of their education. The aim of this quantitative study is to analyze the perceptions of 124 teachers of Primary and Compulsory Secondary Education in the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country (Spain) towards the educational inclusion of students with high abilities, using a scale that reflects the importance given and the level of implementation in practice. The analysis of the results through the AIR technique facilitates the detection of the aspects to be prioritized so that the educational inclusion of students with high abilities goes beyond the level of educational planning. The results show that teachers agree on the need to guarantee the educational inclusion of students with high abilities by improving their approach. The main areas for improvement are the active involvement of all the intervening agents, greater pedagogical qualification of teachers, and a greater provision of resources to guarantee the viability of their educational attention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ábalo, J., Varela, J. y Rial, A. (2006). El análisis de importancia-valoración aplicado a la gestión de servicios. Psicothema, 18(4), 730-737.

Al-Bourini, E. S., Areen Abd Alqader, Q. A., Aranki, R. M. E. y Almajali, H. K. (2022). The level of psychological stress and its relationship with the cognitive motivation of gifted students at King Abdullah II schools of excellence. Resmilitaris, 12(2), 4417-4432.

Alencar, E. (2008). Social-emotional difficulties of the student with high abilities. Revista de Psicología, 26(1), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.200801.003

Antunes, A. P., Dorta, M. J. y Borges, Á. (2022). Alumnado con altas capacidades intelectuales en la Comunidad Autónoma de Canarias: un importante reto educativo en la actualidad. Revista Lusófona de Educação, 55, 167-185. https://doi.org/10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle55.11

Barrera-Algarín, E., Sarasola-Sánchez-Serrano, J. L., García-González, A. y Ruiz-Herrera, M. (2023). Neglecting gifted students: its impact on scholastic failure: perception from the families. Culture and Education, 35(1), 120-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2022.2121133

Callahan, C., Moon, T. y Oh, S. (2017). Describing the Status of Programs for the Gifted: A Call for Action. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(1), 20-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216686215

Callahan, C., Moon, T. R., Oh, S., Azano, A. P. y Hailey, E. P. (2014). What works in gifted education documenting the effects of an integrated curricular-instructional model. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1) 137-167. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214549448

Chua, J. (2017): The influences of an exemplary ballet teacher on students’ motivation: ‘The Finnish Way’, Research in Dance Education, 18(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2016.1178715

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02310555

Desmet, O. A. y Pereira, N. (2022). The achievement motivation enhancement curriculum: evaluating an affective intervention for gifted students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(1), 129-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X211057424

Echeita, G. y Duk, C. (2008). Inclusión educativa. REICE: Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 6(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2008.6.2.001

Gagné, F. (2015). De los genes al talento: la perspectiva DMGT/CMTD. Revista de Educación, 368, 12-39. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2015-368-289

Gobierno Vasco. (2019). Plan de atención educativa para el alumnado con altas capacidades intelectuales. 2019-2022. Gobierno Vasco.

Granjo, M., Castro Silva, J. y Peixoto, F. (2021). Teacher Identity: Can Ethical Orientation Be Related to Perceived Competence, Psychological Needs Satisfaction, Commitment and Global Self-esteem?. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(2), 158-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1748004

Gratacós, G., Mena, J. y Ciesielkiewicz, M. (2021): The complexity thinking approach: beginning teacher resilience and perceived self-efficacy as determining variables in the induction phase. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1900113

Hernández de la Torre, E. y Navarro Montaño, M. J. (2021). responder sin exclusiones a las necesidades educativas de las altas capacidades. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 19(3), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2021.19.3.001

Higueras-Rodríguez, L. (2017). Intervención educativa en el alumnado con altas capacidades. Revista Ensayos Pedagógicos, 12(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.15359/rep.12-1.4

IBM Corp. (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. IBM Corp.

Imbernón, F. (2020). Desarrollo personal, profesional e institucional y formación del profesorado. Algunas tendencias para el siglo XXI. Qurriculum, 33, 49-67. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.qurricul.2020.33.04

Jung, J. Y. (2014). Predictors of attitudes to gifted programs/provisions: Evidence from preservice educators. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 247-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214547636

Kitcharoen, K. (2004). The Importance-Performance Analysis of service quality in administrative departments of private universities in Thailand. ABAC Journal, 24(3), 20-46.

Laine, S., Hotulainen, R. y Tirri, K. (2019). Finnish elementary school teachers’ attitudes toward gifted education. Roeper Review, 41(2), 76-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1592794

Martilla, J. y James, J. (1977). Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41, 77-79.

Martínez-Izaguirre, M., Yániz, C. y Villardón-Gallego, L. (2021). Aplicación de un análisis de importancia y realización de competencias para la identificación de prioridades en la formación docente. Revista de Educación, 393, 97-128. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2021-393-487

NAGC-CEC. (2024). National standards in gifted and talented education. NAGC-CEC.

Ninkov, I. (2020). Education policies for gifted children within a human rights paradigm: A comparative analysis. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 5, 280-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-020-00133-1

Obergriesser, S. y Stoeger, H. (2015). The role of emotions, motivation, and learning behavior in underachievement and results of an intervention. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 167-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1043003

Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R. F. y Worrell, F. C. (2015). Re-pensando las altas capacidades: una aproximación evolutiva. Revista de Educación, 368, 40-65. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2015-368-297

Preckel, F. y Brunner, M. (2015). Academic self-concept, achievement goals, and achievement: Is their relation the same for academic achievers and underachievers? Gifted and Talented International, 30(1-2), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2015.1137458

R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Ramos, A., De Fraine, B. y Verschueren, K. (2021). Learning goal orientation in high-ability and average-ability students: Developmental trajectories, contextual predictors, and long-term educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 370-389. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000476

Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

Schiltz L. (2016). Treating the emotional and motivational inhibition of highly gifted underachievers with music psychotherapy: Meta-analysis of an evaluation study based on a sequential design. Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb,1, 7-26.

Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P. y Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056

Tirri, K. (2017). Teacher Education Is the Key to Changing the Identification and Teaching of the Gifted. Roeper Review, 39(3), 210-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1318996

Vélez-Calvo, X., Dávila, Y., Seade, C., Cordero, M. y Peñaherrera-Vélez, M. (2019). Las altas capacidades en la educación primaria, estudio de prevalencia con niños ecuatorianos. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 5(1), 391-400. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2019.n1.v5.1615

Vidergor, H. E. y Eilam, B. (2011). Impact of professional development programs for teachers of the gifted. Gifted and Talented International, 26, 143-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2011.11673598

Vreys, C., Ndungbogun, G., Kieboom, T. y Venderickx, K. (2018). Training effects on Belgian preschool and primary school teachers’ attitudes towards the best practices for gifted children. High Ability Studies, 29(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/1080/13598139.2017.1312295