Modes of Grouping Students, Segregation and Educational Inequalities. A Longitudinal Analysis of a Cohort of Students in Switzerland
Palavras-chave:
Segmented school system, Integrated school system, School inequalities, School segregation, Educational policies
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Resumo
The education system in Geneva, Switzerland, offers two organisationally contrasting modes of grouping students in secondary 1 education. Students either belong to schools which run a segmented system (students are grouped into two streams based on their academic level) or a more integrated system, with heterogeneous classes made up of ability groups for some subjects. Using longitudinal data, this article examines the impact of these two modes of grouping students and of within-school segregation on the way students are oriented in secondary 2 education. The results of a multilevel logistic regression analysis show that students attending the segmented system are less likely to be oriented towards a baccalaureate school, the most selective path of secondary 2 education. They also show that the effects of within-school segregation contribute to reinforcing inequalities between students: the likelihood of attending a baccalaureate school is much lower in classes with a high percentage of students from a disadvantaged background. Finally, they show that the negative effects of school segregation tend to be stronger in the segmented system.
Downloads
Referências
Bickel, R. (2007). Multilevel analysis for applied research: it's just regression! The Guildford Press.
Brunello, G. & Checchi D. (2007). Does school tracking affect equality of opportunity? New international evidence. Economic Policy 22(52), 781-861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2007.00189.x
Charmillot, S. (2013). Ségrégation et inégalités scolaires: Le cas de l'enseignement secondaire à Genève. Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Éducation, Université de Genève.
Coleman, J. S., Ernest Q., Campbell, C. F., Hobson, J. M., McPartland, A. M., Mood, R. L., York, & Weinfeld, F. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Dumay, X. & Dupriez, V. (2007). Does the school composition effect matter? Some methodological and conceptual considerations. Les Cahiers de Recherche du Girsef, 60, 1-29.
Duru-Bellat, M. (2007). Social inequality in French education. Extent and complexity of the issues. In R. Teese, S. Lamb, and M. Duru-Bellat (Eds.), International studies in educational inequality, theory and policy (pp. 337-356). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5916-2_12
Felouzis, G. & Charmillot, S. (2013). School tracking and educational inequality: A comparison of 12 education systems in Switzerland. Comparative Education 49(2), 181-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2012.706032
Felouzis, G., Charmillot, S., & Fouquet-Chauprade, B. (2011). Les inégalités scolaires en Suisse et leurs déclinaisons cantonales: L’apport de l’enquête PISA 2003. Revue Suisse de Sociologie 37(1), 33-55.
Felouzis, G., Fouquet-Chauprade, B., & Charmillot, S. (2019). School segregation in France: The role of public policies and stakeholder strategies. In X. Bonal and C. Bellei (Eds.), Understanding school segregation. Patterns, causes and consequences of spatial inequalities in education (pp. 29-44). Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350033542.ch-002
Gamoran, A. (2010). Tracking and inequality: New directions for research and practice. In M. Apple, S. Ball, and L. Armando Gandin (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 213-228). Routledge.
Gamoran, A., Nystrand, M., Berends, M., & Lepore, P. (1995). An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 32(4), 687-715. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032004687
Ganzeboom, H. B. G., De Graaf, P. M., & Treiman, D. J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21(1), 1-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(92)90017-B
Hallinan, M. T. (1994). School differences in tracking effects on achievement. Social Forces, 72(3), 799-820. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/72.3.799
Hanushek, E. A. & Woessmann, L. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences- in-differences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal 116(510), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01076.x
Hörner, W., Döbert, H., Reuter, L., & von Kopp, B. (2015). The education systems of Europe. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07473-3
James, D. R. & Taeuber, K. E. (1985). Measures of segregation. Sociological Methodology, 15, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/270845
Jencks, C. & Mayer, S. E. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In L. E. Lynn & M. G. H. McGeary (Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States (pp. 348-363). National Academy Press.
Lucas, S. R. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in american high schools. Teachers College Press.
Lucas, S. R. & Berends, M. (2002). Sociodemographic diversity, correlated achievement, and de facto tracking. Sociology of Education, 75(4), 328-348. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090282
Mickelson, R. A. (2003). When are racial disparities in education the result of racial discrimination? a social science perspective. Teachers College Record, 105(6), 1052-1086. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00277
Monseur, C. & Crahay, M (2008). Composition académique et sociale des établissements, efficacité et inégalités scolaires: Une comparaison internationale. Revue Française De Pédagogie, 164, 55-65. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfp.2128
Murdoch, J., Guégnard, C., Griga, D., Koomen, M., & Imdorf, C. (2016). How do second-generation immigrant students access higher education? The importance of vocational routes to higher education in Switzerland, France, and Germany. Swiss Journal of Sociology 42(2), 245-265. https://doi.org/10.1515/sjs-2016-0011
Murillo, F. J. (2016). Midiendo la segregación escolar en América Latina. Un análisis metodológico utilizando el TERCE [Measuring the school segregation in Latin America. A methodological analysis using TERCE]. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 14(4), 33-60. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2016.14.4.002
Murillo, F. J. & Martínez-Garrido, C. (2019). Profiles of school segregation by socioeconomic status in Spain and its Autonomous Communities. RELIEVE, 25(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.25.1.12917
Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. Yale Univ. Press.
Padilla, E. & Bazán A. (2016). Contextual, socioeconomic and cultural impacts on the outcomes of mexico in reading in PISA 2009. REICE. Ibero-American Journal on Quality, Effectiveness and Change in Education, 14(2), 79-95.
OECD. (2005). PISA 2003 technical report. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264010543-en
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: What makes schools successful? Resources, policies and practices (Volume IV). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201156-en
Rumberger, R. W. & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. Teachers College Record, 107(9), 1999-2045. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00583.x
Schofield, J. W. (1995). Review of research on school desegregation's impact on elementary and secondary school students. In J. A. Banks & C. A. MaGee Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 597-617). Mac Millan.
Slavin, R. E. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57(3), 293-336. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057003293
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 471-499. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060003471
Slavin, R. E. (1993). Ability grouping in the middle grades: Achievement effects and alternatives. Elementary School Journal, 93(5), 535-552. https://doi.org/10.1086/461739
Snijders, T. A. & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. SAGE Publications.
UNESCO. (2006). International standard classification of education, ISCED 97. UNESCO.
van Ewijk, R. & Sleegers, P. (2010a). The effect of peer socioeconomic status on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 134-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.001
van Ewijk, R. & Sleegers, P. (2010b). Peer ethnicity and achievement: A meta-analysis into the compositional effect. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 237-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243451003612671
Weinberg, M. (1975). The relationship between school desegregation and academic achievement: A review of the research. Law and Contemporary Problems, 39(2), 241-270. https://doi.org/10.2307/1191101
Woessmann, L. (2009). International evidence on school tracking: A review. Ifo Institute.