Vol. 16 No. 3 (2018)
Articles

School Principals as Qualify Informants of Educational Policies. Their Opinions under Michelle Bachelet Chilean Government (2014-2017)

José Weinstein
Universidad Diego Portales
Bio
Gonzalo Muñoz
Universidad Diego Portales
Bio
Rosario Rivero
Universidad Diego Portales
Published June 23, 2018

Keywords:

Leadership, Educational management, Educational policy, Government.
How to Cite
Weinstein, J., Muñoz, G., & Rivero, R. (2018). School Principals as Qualify Informants of Educational Policies. Their Opinions under Michelle Bachelet Chilean Government (2014-2017). REICE. Ibero-American Journal on Quality, Effectiveness and Change in Education, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2018.16.3.001

Abstract

School managers are often vindicated as executors of educational policies, recognizing a key role for their success or failure in the schools they lead. This article analyzes, from comparable annual surveys, the opinion that the directors of educational centers had regarding the educational policies developed in Chile under the reformist government of President Michelle Bachelet (2014-2017). The results show that the initiative that most marked the opinion of the directors was the law of educational inclusion, approved controversially at the beginning of the period. Around it there was greater initial pessimism regarding the future of national education, as well as a tendency to distance the opinion of managers working in the public sector with respect to the private sector. It can also be seen that the opinion of managers is dynamic, changing in the course of the government, which usually manifests the urgency of certain educational policies (such as improving initial teacher training) above the rest and also provides valuable information on the effects of policies in the educational centers themselves. Therefore, given their quality as qualified informants, decision makers should systematically consider their opinions in the design and implementation of policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barber, M. y Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best education systems come out on top. Londres: McKinsey.

Bellei, C., Cabalín, C. y Orellana, V. (2014). The 2011 Chilean movement against neoliberal educational policies. Studies in Higher Education, 39(3), 426-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.896179

Bellei, C. (2015). El gran experimento: Mercado y privatización de la educación chilena. Santiago de Chile: LOM ediciones.

Cabalín, C. y Antezana, L. (2016). La educación en portada: La visualización de la política educacional en la prensa. Cuadernos Info, 39, 195-207. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.39.914

CEP. (2015). Encuesta de opinión pública. Santiago de Chile: Centro de Estudios Públicos.

Cox, C. (2012). Política y políticas educacionales en Chile 1990-2010. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 21(1), 13-43.

Cuenca, R. y Cáceda, J. (2017). Ideales normativos, normas y praxis: Patologías sobre los directivos escolares en el Perú. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 15(2), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2017.15.2.001

Day, C., Gu, Q. y Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863

Elmore, R. y McLaughlin, M. W. (1982). Strategic choice in federal education policy: The compliance-assistance tradeoff. En A. Lieberman y M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), Policymaking in education, 81st yearbook of the national society for the study of education (pp. 159- 194). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A. y Friedman, R. M. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida.

Fullan, M. (1985). Change processes and strategies at the local level. The Elementary School Journal, 85(3), 391-421. https://doi.org/10.1086/461411

Fullan, M. (2002). The change. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 16-20.

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. Nueva York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Fullan, M. (2017). Liderar los aprendizajes: Acciones concretas en pos de la mejora escolar. En J. Weinstein y G. Muñoz (Ed.), Mejoramiento y liderazgo en la escuela. Once miradas (pp. 34-55). Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales.

Hargreaves, A. y Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Nueva York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A. y Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800060

MINEDUC. (2017). Estadísticas de la educación 2016. Santiago de Chile: MINEDUC

Muñoz, G. (2013). Claves de una nueva reforma educacional para el Chile que viene. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Ariel.

Muñoz, G. y Weinstein, J. (en prensa). Ley de inclusión: El difícil proceso para redefinir las reglas del juego de la educación particular subvencionada en Chile.

OECD. (2017). Revisión de políticas nacionales en educación: Chile. París: OECD.

O’Laughlin, L. y Lindle, J. C. (2015). Principals as political agents in the implementation of IDEA’s least restrictive environment mandate. Educational Policy, 29(1), 140-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814563207

Rigby, J. G., Woulfin, S. L. y März, V. (2016). Understanding how structure and agency influence education policy implementation and organizational change. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 295-302. https://doi.org/10.1086/685849

Rivas, A. (2015). América Latina después de PISA. Lecciones aprendidas de la educación en siete países. Buenos Aires: CIPPEC.

Seashore-Louis, K., Dretzke, B. y Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 315-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2010.486586

Serrano, S. (2012). Historia de la educación en Chile (1810-2010): Aprender a leer y escribir (1810-1880). Santiago de Chile: Taurus.

Stein, M., Grover, B. y Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455-488. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002455

Sun, M., Kenneth,F., Penuel, W. y Chong Min, K. (2013). How external institutions penetrate schools through formal and informal leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(4), 610-644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12468148

UNICEF. (2014). La voz del movimiento estudiantil 2011. Educación pública, gratuita y de calidad. Algunas lecciones para el sistema educativo chileno. Santiago de Chile: UNICEF.

Vázquez, S., Bernal Agudo, J. L. y Liesa, M. (2014). La conceptualización del liderazgo: una aproximación desde la práctica educativa. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 12(5), 79-97.

Weinstein, J. y Muñoz, G. (2009). Calidad para todos. La reforma educacional en el punto de quiebre. En J. Weinstein (Coord.), Más acá de los sueños, más allá de lo posible: La concertación en Chile (pp. 77-93). Santiago de Chile: LOM.

Young, T. y Lewis, W. D. (2015). Educational policy implementation revisited. Educational Policy, 29(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815568936