Vol. 8 No. 3 (2010): Community Participation in School Improvement
Articles

Opinion Studies Employers. Strategy to Improve the Quality of Non-University Higher Education

Published July 1, 2016

Keywords:

Employers, graduate, professional profile, pertinence, quality of education
How to Cite
Damián Simón, J., Montes Pauda, E., & Arellano Mont, L. J. (2016). Opinion Studies Employers. Strategy to Improve the Quality of Non-University Higher Education. REICE. Ibero-American Journal on Quality, Effectiveness and Change in Education, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2010.8.3.011

Abstract

We present the results of a case study which examines the views of employers of graduates of Higher Technical University in Business Administration (HTUBA) as a strategy to improve the quality and relevance of the educational program. The goal was to assess the degree of compliance of the professional profile according to the functions, activities, tasks, skills and attitudes of graduates in response to the professional profile requested by the employer and, identify the professional demands facing these graduates. We worked with a convenience sample of 30 employers those to date have recruited a large number of graduates. The results obtained by contrasting the various views, show that employers of medium and large enterprises have high levels of satisfaction at the completion of the professional profile of HTUBA, however, employers in small businesses have a low degree of satisfaction professional performance of graduates, indicating that during their training, graduates have received little preparation for addressing this sector employers.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANUIES. (1998). Esquema básico para estudios de egresados. México: ANUIES.

Arnaz, J.A. (2001). La planeación curricular. Cursos básicos para formación de profesores. México: Trillas.

Baena, G. (1999). Calidad y Educación Superior. Los retos para el tercer milenio. México: Ariel.

Banco Mundial. (1995). Prioridades y estrategias para la educación. En Rafael, C. (Comp.): Disyuntiva actual de la educación superior. México: UNAM-Praxis.

Banegas, I. y Blanco, E. (2005). Políticas y sistemas de evaluación educativa en México. Avances, logros y desafíos. México: Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación.

Beneitone P. y et al (2007). Reflexiones y perspectivas de la Educación Superior en América Latina. Informe final–Proyecto Tuning–América Latina 2004-2007. España: Universidad de Deusto.

Cabrera D.K. y Gonzáles L.E. (2006). Currículo universitario basado en competencias. Colombia: Ediciones Uninorte.

Celis, J. y Gómez, V. (2005). Factores de innovación curricular y académica en la educación superior. Revista electrónica de la Red de Investigación Educativa, 1(2), pp. 1-16.

CGUT. (2003). Modelo de Evaluación de la Calidad. Subsistema de Universidades Tecnológicas. México: Secretaría de Educación Pública.

CGUTa. (2009). Objetivos y Atributos de las Universidades Tecnológicas. Recuperado el 11 de septiembre de 2009, http://cgut.sep.gob.mx