Didactic-Methodological Innovations in Ruralnet's Virtual Context and Satisfaction of the University Students
Keywords:
Didactic innovations, virtual context, student satisfaction, conceptual mapsCopyright (c) 2023 REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
In the subject Education in the rural area (Ruralnet), -subject to the grade of Pedagogy of the University of Oviedo and offered the Virtual Shared Campus of the G9-, it developed different didactic - methodological innovations, during the period that includes the courses 2005-2006, 2006-2007 and 2007-2008, in relation so much: to the didactic adopted strategies; to the formulation of formative activities of individual character (studies of cases, conceptual maps, mental maps, and search of information across the Internet, etc.) and collaborative activity (Gameproyect) attending to the cognitive diversity of the students, and the use of the tools of the Web 2.0 (forums, wikis, blogs); as well as, to the virtual context and / or blended context in the one that developed the action tutorial. Also, we show the opinions of the students about the innovations implemented in the subject. The results show students' preferences as to the approach of collaborative activities that support the approach to similar situations that could develop as independent professionals, as well as individual practice approach based on the realization of concept maps, especially for students with active learning style and pragmatic. Demanding a quick tutorial and virtualized solve their cuestions and guide their learning.
Downloads
References
Alonso, C., Gallego, D. y Honey, P. (1999). Los estilos de aprendizaje. Procedimientos de diagnóstico y mejora. Bilbao: Ediciones Mensajero.
Barbera, E. (2003). Educación en la red. Las actividades virtuales de enseñanza y aprendizaje. Barcelona: Editorial Paidós Ibérica, S.A.
Barkley, E., Cross, K. y Major, C. (2007). Técnicas de aprendizaje colaborativo. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia- Editorial Morata.
Buzan, T. (1996). El libro de los mapas mentales. Barcelona: Editorial Urano.
Cabero, J. y Aguaded, J.I. (2003). Tecnologías en la era de la globalización. Comunicar, 21, 12-14.
Castañedo, C. (2003). El rol del profesor en la transición de la enseñanza presencial al aprendizaje “on line”. Comunicar, 21, 49-55.
Cebrian, M. (2003). Enseñanza virtual para la innovación universitaria. Madrid: Editorial Narcea.
Corno, J. y Randi, L. (2000). ¿Una teoría del diseño educativo basado en el aprendizaje autorregulado?. En Reigeluth, C. (coord.). Diseño de la instrucción: teorías y modelos: un nuevo paradigma de la teoría de la instrucción. (Vol. 1, pp. 305-334). Madrid: Editorial Santillana.
Del Moral, M. E. y Villalustre, L. (2007). GameProject: A Multimedia Presentation Of A Joint Project For A Degree In Education. Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (pp. 2005-2012). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Del Moral, M. E. y Villalustre, L. (2008). Sviluppo di progetti collaborativi in corsi universitari a partire da un gioco di simulazione e da Wiki. Tecnologie Didattiche, 45(3), 31-37.
Del Moral, M. E. y Villalustre, L. (2009). Modalidades de aprendizaje telemático y resultados interuniversitarios extrapolables al nuevo EEES (Proyecto MATRIX). Barcelona: Editorial Octaedro.
Dodge, B. (1997). Building Blocks of a Webquest. http://projects.edtech.sandi.net/staffdev/buildingblocks/p-index.htm. (06-02- 2009)
Hannan, A. y Silver, H. (2000). Innovating in higher education: Teaching, lerning and institucional cultures. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Honey, P. y Mumford, A. (1982). Manual of Learning Styles. London: P. Honey.
Hinojo, F.J., Aznar, I. y Cáceres, M.P. (2009). Percepciones del alumnado sobre el blended learning en la universidad. Comunicar, 33, 165-174.
Kirkgöz, J. (2009). Students’ and lecturers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of foreign language instruction in an English-medium university in Turkey. Teaching in Higher Education, 14 (1), 81 – 93.
Marchesi, A. y Martín, E. (1998). Calidad de la enseñanza en tiempos de cambio. Madrid: Alianza.
Margalef, R. y Pareja, L. (2008). Innovation, Research and Professional Development in Higher Education: Learning from Our Own Experience. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 24 (1), 104-116.
Mingorance, P. (2001). Aprendizaje y desarrollo profesional de los profesores. En Marcelo, C. (Coord.). La función docente. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
Novak, J. y Gowin, D. (1998). Aprendiendo a aprender. Barcelona: Ediciones Martínez Roca, S. A.
Peck, C., Gallucci, C., Sloan, T. y Otros (2009). Organizational learning and program renewal in teacher education: A socio-cultural theory of learning, innovation and change. Educational Research Review, 4, 16–25.
Thomson, S.D. (1986). Strategies for improving achievemente within Diversity. Meeting of the International Intervisitation Programe in Educational Administration. Hawai: ERIC.
Young, J., Hall, C. yClark, T. (2007). Challenges to university autonomy in initial teacher education programmes: The cases of England, Manitoba and British Columbia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 8–93.