Proposal and Analysis of a Model for the Supervision and Inspection of Students´ Evaluation Process in Schools "MOSUPEV": A Case Study
Keywords:
School assessment, supervision, educational inspection, school organization.Copyright (c) 2016 REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This article describes and analyzes a model of supervision and inspection of student assessment process called "MOSUPEV" (MOdel of SUPervision of EValuation) that was developed experimentally in the province of Toledo (Castilla-La Mancha) during the academic courses 2009/11. Supervision and inspection of student assessment process is one of the fundamental pillars to change the current education system and to guarantee a fundamental right of students to an objective assessment. Therefore, the supervision and guidance of these processes should be a priority for educational inspection services of all regions. Methodologically, it is a descriptive and quantitative research in which we present the fundamental characteristics of the model and then we analyze from quantitative perspective the proposed model with pretest and postest technique at two experimental and control schools. Among the final conclusions, we emphasize that a model of supervision of student assessment agreed, under a protocol, flexible and holistic promotes regulations compliance and guarantee the right to an objective assessment and also encourages new models of school evaluation schools.
Downloads
References
Allen, M. (2009). General education assessment. Texas A and M assessment Conference, San Antonio.
Anderson, R. H. y Snyder, K. J. (1998). Functions of School Supervision. In Gerald R. Firth and Edward F. Pajak, eds., Handbook of research on school supervision, pp. 341–73. New York: Macmillan.
Anguera, M. T. Arnau, J., Ato, M., Martínez-Arias, R., Pascual, J. y Vallejo, G. (1995). Métodos de investigación en Psicología. Madrid: Síntesis.
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2010). Engaging departments: Assessing Student Learning. Peer Review: Emerging trends and key debates in undergraduate education, 12 (1).
Banta, T. (Ed.). (2007). Assessing student learning in the disciplines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Beach, D. M. y Reinhartz, J. (2000). Supervisory Leadership: Focus on Instruction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Brownell, J. E. y Swaner, L. E. (2010). Five high-impact practices: Research on learning outcomes, completion, and quality. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Casanova, M. A. (1995). Manual de evaluación educativa. Madrid: La Muralla; 9ª edición: 2007.
Casanova, M. A. (2004). Evaluación y calidad de centros educativos. Madrid: La Muralla; 2ª edición: 2007.
Casanova, M. A. (2011). Evaluación para la Inclusión Educativa. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 4 (1), pp. 78-89.
Daresh, J. C. and Playko, M. A. (1995). Supervision as a Proactive Process. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.
Dean, J. (1997). Supervisión y asesoramiento. Manual para inspectores, asesores y profesorado asesor. Madrid: La Muralla.
English, F. W. y Hill, J. C. (1995). Calidad total en educación. Transformación de las escuelas en sitios de aprendizaje. Aplicación de las ideas de Deming a la enseñanza. México: Edamex.
Fleischman, H. L., Hopstock, P .J., Pelczar, M. P. y Shelley, B. E. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.
Gairín, J. (dir.) (2006). Procesos de cambio en los centros educativos a partir de evaluaciones externas. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia-CIDE.
Gil de Zárate, A. (1855). De la instrucción pública en España. Tomo I. Madrid: Imprenta del Colegio de Sordomudos.
Glanz, J. y Neville, R. F. (eds.) (1997). Educational Supervision: Perspectives, Issues, and Controversies. Norwood, Mass.: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
Glickman, C. D. (1985). Supervision of instruction: A developmental approach. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Hoy, W. K. y Forsyth, P. B. (1986). Effective Supervision: Theory into Practice. New York: Random House.
Jiménez, C., López-Barajas, E. y Pérez, R. (1998). Pedagogía Experimental II. Tomo 2. Madrid: UNED.
Joyce, B. (Ed.). (1990). Changing school culture through staff decisions development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Kisnerman, N. (1999). Reunión de Conjurados. Conversaciones sobre Supervisión. Buenos Aires: Argentina. Editorial Lumen-Humanistas.
Lafourcade, P. D. (1972). Evaluación de los aprendizajes. Madrid: Cincel.
Maki, P. (2010). Assessing for learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Marzano, R. J. y Kendall, J. S. (2008). Designing and assessing educational objectives: Applying the new taxonomy. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Neagley, Ross L. y Evans, H. D. (1980). Handbook for Effective Supervision of Instruction. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Nevo, D. (1989). The conceptualization of educational evaluation: An analytical review of the literature. En E.R. House (Ed.), New directions in educational evaluation, pp.15-29. London: The Falmer Press.
Oliva, P. F. (2001). Developing the Curriculum. New York: Longman.
Pawlas, G. E. (1995). Administrator’s Guide to School-Community Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Eye on Education.
Polo Martínez, I. (2012). Los criterios de evaluación como detonante de la programación didáctica. Avances en supervisión educative, 15.
Rhodes, T. L. (2010). Assessing outcomes and improving achievement: Tips and tools for using rubrics. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Rodríguez, J. L. (1980). Didáctica General. I. Objetivos y evaluación. Madrid: Cincel.
Rosales, C. (1989). Perspectivas sobre evaluación educativa. Santiago de Compostela: Tórculo.
Rul, J. (2002). Inspección de educación: profesionalización versus politización. Organización y gestión educativa. Forum Europeo de Administradores de la Educación.,3, pp. 50-53. Ed. Praxis.
Santos, M.A. (1993). La evaluación: un proceso de diálogo, comprensión y mejora. Málaga: Aljibe.
Snyder, K.J. (1997). What Is the New Supervisory Role in an Age of Complexity? En Jeffrey Glanz y Richard F.
Neville, eds., Educational supervision: perspectives, issues, and controversies, pp. 299–314. Norwood, Mass.: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
Sergiovanni, T. J. y Starratt, R.J. (1998). Supervision: A Redefinition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Soler, E. (coord.) (1993). Fundamentos de supervisión educativa. Madrid: La Muralla.
Soler, E. (2001). La visita de inspección. Madrid: La Muralla.
Sternberg, R. J. y Williams, W. M. (Eds.). (2009). Intelligence, Instruction, and Assessment. US N.J: Routledge.
Tanner, D. y Tanner, L. N. (1987). Supervision in Education: Problems and Practices. New York: Macmillan.
Tracy, S. J. (1993). Restructuring Instructional Supervision. Contemporary Education, 64, pp.128-131.
Vázquez, E., Sevillano, M.ª L. y Méndez, M. A. (2011). Programar en Primaria y Secundaria. Madrid. Pearson.
Wiles, J. y Bondi, J. (2000). Supervision: A Guide to Practice. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.