Sujeto Académico Neoliberal: Cuantificado, Digitalizado y Bibliometrificado
Palabras clave:
Educación superior, Neoliberalismo, Gobernabilidad, Bibliometría, DigitalizaciónResumen
Este artículo analiza, a partir de un enfoque de origen Foucaultiano, las formas en que el profesorado universitario actualmente se constituye a sí mismo, en lo que hemos dado en llamar “sujeto académico neoliberal”. Es una primera exploración de una investigación más amplia. Desde esta mirada, analizamos los procesos de neoliberalización en el sujeto académico contemporáneo, mostrando cómo se configuran la formación y carrera universitaria de los jóvenes investigadores, dentro de la mercantilización dominante en la educación superior en España. Mediante 24 entrevistas semiestructuradas, de un trabajo más amplio de corte cualitativo, se interpretan los efectos de estas lógicas en el sujeto académico la Educación Superior en España. Creyendo que son libres en sus prácticas, mediante el invisible poder de unas formas blandas de gobernanza (soft governance), nuevas relaciones de conocimiento-poder (rankings, evaluaciones cuantificadoras) y procesos de digitalización (bibliometría, impactos) están provocando nuevas subjetividades académicas. Los análisis muestran cambios en los sistemas de cuantificación en la producción académica que provoca procesos de somatización del neoliberalismo, así como la configuración de nuevas subjetividades académicas a través de las digitalizaciones y el impacto bibliométrico.
Descargas
Citas
Altbach, P. G. y de Wit, H. (2019). Too much academic research is being published. International Higher Education, 96, 2-3. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2019.96.10767
Badiou, A. (2008). Number and numbers. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Ball, S. J. (2012). Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-spy guide to the neoliberal university. British Journal of Educational Studies 60(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2011.650940
Barnett, R. (1996). The evaluation of the higher education system in the United Kingdom. En R. Cowen (Ed.), The world yearbook of education: The evaluation of higher education systems: Londres: Kegan Paul.
Barry, A., Osborne, T. y Rose, N. (1996). Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neoliberalism and rationalities of government. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Beall, J. (2017). What I learned from predatory publishers. Biochemia Medica, 27(2), 273-278. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.029
Beall, J. (2018). Scientific soundness and the problem of predatory journals. En A. Kaufman y J. Kaufman (Eds.), Pseudoscience: The conspiracy against science (pp. 283-299). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262037426.003.0012
Beer, D. (2016). Metric power. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55649-3
Brøgger, K. (2019a). Governing through standards: The faceless masters of higher education. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00886-4
Brøgger, K. (2019b). How education standards gain hegemonic power and become international: The case of higher education and the Bologna process. European Educational Research Journal, 18(2), 158-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118790303
Brunner, J. J., Labraña, J., Ganga, F. y Rodríguez-Ponce, E. (2019). Idea moderna de universidad. De la torre de marfil al capitalismo académico. Educación XX1, 22(2), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.22480
Burchell, G., Gordon, C. y Miller, P. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. With two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226028811.001.0001
Butler, J. (2010). Mecanismos psíquicos del poder. Madrid: Cátedra.
Cannizzo, F. (2015). Academic subjectivities: Governmentality and self-development in higher education. Foucault Studies, 20, 199-217. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i0.4937
Cheney-Lippold, J. (2017). We are data: Algorithms and the making of our digital selves. Nueva York, NY: New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1gk0941
Cowen, R. (1996). Performativity, Post-modernity and the university. Comparative Education, 32(2), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050069628876
De Angelis, M. y Harvie, D. (2009). Cognitive capitalism and the rat-race: How capital measures immaterial labour in British universities. Historical Materialism, 17(3), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1163/146544609X12469428108420
Feldman, Z. y Sandoval, M. (2018). Metric power and the academic self: Neoliberalism, knowledge and resistance in the British university. TripleC, 16(1), 214-233. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v16i1.899
Foucault, M. (1988). El sujeto y el poder. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 50(3), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/3540551
Foucault, M. (1991). Gubernamentalidad. En AA.VV. Espacios de poder (pp. 9-26). Madrid: La Piqueta.
Foucault, M. (2007). Nacimiento de la biopolítica. Curso en el Collège de France (1978-1979). Buenos Aires: FCE.
Gill, R. (2010). Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of neo-liberal academia. En R. Flood y R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections (pp. 228-244). Londres: Routledge.
Guthrie, S., Lichten, C., Van Belle, J., Ball, S., Knack, A. y Hofman, J. (2017). Understanding mental health in the research environment. A rapid evidence assessment. Santa Mónica, CA: RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2022
Habermas, J. (1987). La idea de la universidad-procesos de aprendizaje. Sociológica, 5(2), art 1. Recuperado de http://www.sociologicamexico.azc.uam.mx/index.php/Sociologica/article/view/1045/1017.
Hall, G. (2016). The uberfication of the university. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/9781452958439
Han, B. (2014). Psicopolítica. Neoliberalismo y nuevas técnicas de poder. Barcelona: Herder.
Harzing, A. W. (2010). The publish or perish book. Melbourne: Tarma Software Research.
Hernández, R. M. (2014). La investigación cualitativa a través de entrevistas. Su análisis mediante la teoría fundamentada. Cuestiones Pedagógicas, 23, 187-210.
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S. y Rafols, I. (2015). The Leiden manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520, 429-431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
Howie, G., (2005). Universities in the UK: Drowning by numbers. Critical Quarterly, 47, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-1562.2005.00610.x
Jankowski, N. y Provezis, S. (2014). Neoliberal ideologies, governmentality and the academy: An examination of accountability through assessment and transparency. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(5), 475-487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2012.721736
Kvale, N. (2011). Las entrevistas en la investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Morata.
Lim, M. A. (2019). Governing higher education: The PURE data system and the management of the bibliometric self. Higher Education Policy, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-00130-0
Loveday, V. (2018). The neurotic academic: Anxiety, casualisation, and governance in the neoliberalising university. Journal of Cultural Economy, 11(2), 154-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2018.1426032
Luengo, J. y Saura, G. (2013). La performatividad en la educación: La construcción del nuevo docente y el nuevo gestor performativo. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Educación, 11(3), 139-153.
Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified self: A sociology of self- tracking. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lupton, D., Mewburn, I. y Thomson, P. (2018). The digital academic: Critical perspectives on digital technologies in higher education. Milton Keynes: Routledge.
Lyotard, J. F. (1979). La condición postmoderna. Madrid: Cátedra.
Marginson, S. (2013). The impossibility of capitalist markets in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 28(3), 353-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.747109
Mirowski, P. (2013). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: How neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. Londres: Verso.
Moore, P. y Robinson, A. (2016). The quantified self: What counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media & Society, 18(11), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604328
Morrissey, J. (2013). Governing the academic subject: Foucault, governmentality and the performing university. Oxford Review of Education, 39(6), 797-810. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.860891
Nóvoa, A. (2015). Em busca da liberdade nas universidades: Para que serve a pesquisa em educação? Educação e Pesquisa, 41(1), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022015400100301
Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305
Ong, A. (2007). Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 3‐8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00234.x
Ozga, J., Seddon, T. y Popkewitz, T. S. (2006). Education research and policy: Steering the knowledge-based economy. World yearbook of education 2006. Londres: Routledge.
Read, J. (2009). A genealogy of homo-economicus: Neoliberalism and the production of subjectivity. Foucault Studies, 6, 25-36. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i0.2465
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom. Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488856
Saura, G. (2016). Neoliberalismo como discurso. La evaluación en educación entre tecnologías políticas neoliberales y la nueva filantropía. Educaçao, Sociedade & Culturas, 47, 11-30.
Scharff, C. (2017). The psychic life of neoliberalism: Mapping the contours of entrepreneurial subjectivity. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(6), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415590164
Shore, C. (2010). Beyond the multiversity: Neoliberalism and the rise of the schizophrenic university. Social Anthropology, 18(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2009.00094.x
Shore, C. y Wright, S. (2015). Audit culture revisited. Rankings, rantings, and the reassembling of society. Current Anthropology, 56(3), 421-444. https://doi.org/10.1086/681534
Slaughter, S. y Leslie, L. L. (2001). Expanding and elaborating the concept of academic capitalism. Organization, 8(2), 154-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508401082003
Springer, S. (2012). Neoliberalism as discourse: Between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(2), 133‐147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.656375
Sugrue, C. (2015). Unmasking school leadership: A longitudinal life history of school leaders. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9433-6
Tight, M. (2019). The neoliberal turn in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(3), 273-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12197
Torres, C. y Schugurensky, D. (2002). The political economy of higher education in the era of neoliberal globalization: Latin America in comparative perspective. Higher Education, 43, 429-455. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015292413037
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Houndmills: Palgrave-Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07299-3
Williamson, B. (2017). Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. Londres: SAGE.