Keywords:
Mexican Foreign Policy, LGBTQI, Sexual orientation, Gender identity, Human RightsCopyright (c) 2025 Javier Felipe Basulto Poot

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
In the most recent years, Mexico has incorporated the promotion and protection of the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender queer and intersexual people (LGBTQI+) into its foreign policy. This expansion has been triggered by the accelerated recognition of the rights of these groups within Mexico itself, where substantial legal reforms have led to same-sex marriage, the inclusion of transgender and non-binary identities in official documents and a nation-wide ban of the so-called conversion therapies. This article intends to identify possible common guidelines and objectives which might link all the activities of Mexico in this field with a specific strategy aimed at safeguarding the rights of the LGBTQI+ community at the international level. To this end, the methodological approach used has been a qualitative analysis of a vast array of literature and official documents issued by Mexican authorities including work programmes, statements and press releases. Resolutions, decisions and reports of international organizations such as the United Nations Organization (UNO), the Human Rights Council (HRC) and the Organization of American States (OAS) have also been carefully examined. For the sole purpose of this paper, a holistic approach of the concept of the LGBTQI+ community has been chosen instead of opting for a disaggregation in diverse categories. The basic hypothesis has been that, although Mexican international activities in favour of LGBTQI+ rights have recently been carried out, they have not been based on a comprehensive, dedicated strategy within the framework of Mexican Foreign Policy. The analysis has included the most important achievements in LGBTQI+ rights in Mexico and how these have been reflected in two categories of the work done by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Mexico (SRE): 1) administrative measures implemented by the Ministry at Mexican offices abroad and 2) the participation of Mexico in the discussion of LGBTQI+ —related matters at the bilateral and, more importantly, at the multilateral level in International Organizations. Regarding the administrative rules, Mexican transgender people can nowadays obtain birth certificates (since 2022) and passports (2016) with an updated gender marker at Mexican embassies and consulates, where same-sex marriages have also been performed since 2019. Furthermore, non-binary identity markers can also be included in Mexican passports since 2023. All Mexican offices outside Mexico have put in practice a safe zone policy, declaring the premises of embassies and consulates as discrimination-free spaces. In this regard it is important to stress that the main beneficiaries of these measures have been LGBTQI+ members of the Mexican communities abroad, particularly in the United States of America, where approximately thirty seven million people are entitled to Mexican citizenship and, therefore, represent a politically appealing group with voting rights. The second area where Mexico has contributed to upholding the rights of LGBTQI+ people in the international arena is the dialogue with other states and in intergovernmental fora. In this context, the analysis of the available documents showed no clear evidence that the topics of sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression (SOGIE) had been included in the work agendas of bilateral meetings held by Mexico with other countries. On the contrary, Mexico has been active in the discussions on these issues within the scope of the UNO, the HRC and OAS. Concerning the UNO in New York, Mexico has supported various resolutions where the concept of sexual orientation has been introduced and has also been a member of the United Nations LGBTI Core Group since 2016. In the HRC, Mexico has voted in favour of several resolutions on SOGIE, supported the appointment of an Independent Expert on Protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and makes recommendations on SOGIE to other states as a part of the Universal Periodic Review, although this course of action has not always been a permanent practice. With respect to other organizations under the umbrella of the UNO, a backlash against the consideration of any LGBTQI+ issues in their work is currently gaining momentum, spearheaded by countries that still criminalize homosexuality and gender identity and / or expression. Mexico has played an active role in defending the inclusion of SOGIE references in documents approved by such entities as the World Health Organization, the International Labour Organization and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Particular emphasis must be placed on the work done within the OAS in benefit of LGBTQI+ people such as the creation of a LGBT Core Group in 2016 (with Mexico as a founding member), the annual approval of an omnibus Resolution on the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights (with a special section on LGBTQI+ rights) and the adoption of the Inter-American Convention against All Forms of Discrimination and Intolerance on the 5th of June, 2023, which Mexico signed and ratified. Despite all these positive measures and activities, based on the annual work programmes issued by the division in charge of Human Rights at the SRE, the efforts towards protecting LGBTQI+ rights have been rather conceptualised as a component of a more general objective of promoting issues related to gender and anti-discrimination. Moreover, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer people are frequently mentioned along with other socially disadvantaged groups. Consequently, after a thorough review of the available data, it can be stated that there is presently no specialized strategy of the Mexican Foreign Policy consecrated to LGBTQI+ rights. Nevertheless, there is sufficient ground for advocating such a specific approach, in view of the recent Mexican activism in this field and the fact that homosexuality and gender expression are still criminalised in sixty countries around the world, of which seven impose the death penalty for homosexual acts between consenting adults. At a first stage, a specially designed Mexican strategy could focus on the most urgent and achievable goals, some of which could be: the decriminalisation of homosexuality (particularly in the Caribbean nations which have yet to abolish their legal provisions in this matter), the prohibition in the entirety of the American Continent of any sort of discrimination based on SOGIE, and the outlawing of conversion therapies. These topics should also be introduced not only in the work agendas of bilateral meetings but also in the recommendations which Mexico presents during the HRC Universal Periodic Review of countries where the LGBTQI+ community still faces serious challenges. Finally, a dedicated strategy of the Mexican Foreign Policy geared towards the international protection of the rights of LGBTQI+ people could strengthen the reputation of Mexico as a staunch ally in the promotion of human rights and anti-discrimination policies around the globe.
Downloads
References
Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas (25.02.2003). Resolución aprobada por la Asamblea General. 57/214. Ejecuciones extrajudiciales, sumarias o arbitrarias. A/RES/57/214. Recuperado de: https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n02/553/37/pdf/n0255337.pdf?token=BIisnXgBE2Ah2i5pEM&fe=true (14.03.2024)
Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas (05.01.2023). Resolución aprobada por la Asamblea General el 15 de diciembre de 2022. 77/218. Ejecuciones extrajudiciales, sumarias o arbitrarias. A/RES/87/218. Recuperado de: https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n22/762/61/pdf/n2276261.pdf?token=OTc1cIktpf9e9YC8Pq&fe=true (14.03.2024)
Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas (22.12.2008). Carta de fecha 18 de diciembre de 2008 dirigida al Presidente de la Asamblea General por los Representantes Permanentes de la Argentina, el Brasil, Croacia, Francia, el Gabón, el Japón, Noruega y los Países Bajos ante las Naciones Unidas. A/63/635. Recuperado de: https://www.oas.org/dil/esp/orientacion_sexual_declaracion_onu.pdf (14.03.2024)
Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas (14.07.2011). Resolución aprobada por el Consejo de Derechos Humanos. 17/19. Derechos humanos, orientación sexual e identidad de género. A/HRC/RES/17/19. Recuperado de: https://documents.un.org/doc/resolution/gen/g11/148/79/pdf/g1114879.pdf?token=YOQYS1BxbF3ZbkAHMI&fe=true (16.03.2024)
Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas (02.10.2014). Resolución aprobada por el Consejo de Derechos Humanos. 27/32. Derechos humanos, orientación sexual e identidad de género. A/HRC/RES/27/32. Recuperado de: https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g14/177/35/pdf/g1417735.pdf?token=0LjOMFV5guPmarsPnh&fe=true (16.03.2024)
Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas (15.07.2016). Resolución aprobada por el Consejo de Derechos Humanos el 30 de junio de 2016. 32/2. Protección contra la violencia y la discriminación por motivos de orientación sexual e identidad de género. A/HRC/RES/32/2. Recuperado de: https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g16/154/18/pdf/g1615418.pdf?token=d3n6PFjbVRPlMuRKxn&fe=true (16.03.2024)
Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas (01.05.2020). Práctica de las llamadas “terapias de conversión”. Informe del
Experto Independiente sobre la protección contra la violencia y la discriminación por motivos de orientación sexual o
identidad de género. A/HRC/44/53. Recuperado de:
https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g20/108/71/pdf/g2010871.pdf?token=j96e5V5XouetWhuyCS&fe=true
(14.05.2024)
Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas (01.05.2023). Práctica de las llamadas “terapias de conversión”. Informe del Experto Independiente sobre la protección contra la violencia y la discriminación por motivos de orientación sexual o identidad de género. A/HRC/44/53. Recuperado de: https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g20/108/71/pdf/g2010871.pdf?token=j96e5V5XouetWhuyCS&fe=true (14.05.2024)
Asociación Internacional de Personas Lesbianas, Gays, Bisexuales, Trans e Intersex. Legal Frameworks | Criminalisation of consensual same-sex sexual acts. ILGA World Data Base. Recuperado de: https://database.ilga.org/criminalisation-consensual-same-sex-sexual-acts (26.05.2024)
Asociación Internacional de Personas Lesbianas, Gays, Bisexuales, Trans e Intersex. Legal Frameworks | Regulation of so-called “conversion therapies”. ILGA World Data Base. Recuperado de: https://database.ilga.org/conversion-therapies-lgbti (27.05.2024)
Ayoub, P. y Stoeck, K. (2024). The Global Resistance to LGBTIQ Rights. Journal of Democracy, 35 (1), 59-73.
Comisión de Derechos Humanos, ARCO Internacional. 2005 Joint Statement on Sexual Orientation & Human Rights, delivered by New Zealand (03.2005). Recuperado de: https://arc-international.net/global-advocacy/sogi-statements/2005-joint-statement (14.03.2024).
Comisión de Derechos Humanos, ARCO Internacional. 2006 Joint Statement- 3rd session of Human Right Council. Joint statement by H.E. Wegger Chr. H.e. Strømmen (01.12.2006). Recuperado de: https://arc-international.net/global-advocacy/sogi-statements/2006-joint-statement (14.03.2024).
Comisión de Derechos Humanos, ARCO Internacional. 2011 Joint statement. Ending acts of violence and related human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity (22.03.2011). Recuperado de: https://arc-international.net/global-advocacy/human-rights-council/hrc16/joint-statement (14.03.2024)
Corrales, J. (2019). The Expansion of LGBT Rights in Latin America and the Backlash. En Bosia, M., McEvoy, S. y Rahman, M. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Global LGBT and Sexual Diversity Politics (pp. 185-200). Oxford University Press.
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Opinión Consultiva OC-24/17 de 24 de noviembre de 2017 solicitada por la República de Costa Rica. Identidad de género, e igualdad y no discriminación a parejas del mismo sexo. Recuperada de: https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_24_esp.pdf (20.06.2024)
Cullinan, K. (15.06.2023). Extraordinary ‘Culture War’ Clash at ILO over LGBTQ Rights. Health Policy Watch. Recuperado de: https://healthpolicy-watch.news/extraordinary-culture-war-clash-at-ilo-over-lgbtq-rights (04.04.2024)
Díaz, J. (2018). La diplomacia queer y la indecisión nacional: las acciones gubernamentales ejecutivas sobre la diversidad sexual en México. Estudios Filosofía Historia Letras, 127 (XVI), 147-168.
Dirección General de Derechos Humanos y Democracia (2014). Programa anual de actividades 2015. Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores.
Dirección General de Derechos Humanos y Democracia (2015). Programa anual de actividades 2016. Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores.
Dirección General de Derechos Humanos y Democracia (2016). Programa anual de actividades 2017. Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores.
Dirección General de Derechos Humanos y Democracia (2017). Programa anual de actividades 2018. Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores.
Dirección General de Derechos Humanos y Democracia (2018). Programa anual de actividades 2019. Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores.
Dirección General de Derechos Humanos y Democracia (2019). Programa anual de actividades 2020. Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores.
Dirección General de Derechos Humanos y Democracia (2020). Programa anual de actividades 2021. Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores.
Dirección General de Derechos Humanos y Democracia (2021). Programa anual de actividades 2022. Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores.
Dirección General de Derechos Humanos y Democracia (2022). Programa anual de actividades 2023. Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores.
Dirección General de Derechos Humanos y Democracia (2023). Programa anual de actividades 2024. Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores.
Embajada de México en Alemania (23.07.2019). La Embajada de México en Alemania celebra primer matrimonio igualitario. Recuperado de: https://embamex.sre.gob.mx/alemania/index.php/es/comunicados/615-la-embajada-de-mexico-en-alemania-celebra-primer-matrimonio-igualitario (08.04.2024)
Gobierno de México (02.07.2020). Programa Sectorial de Relaciones Exteriores 2020-2024. Diaro Oficial de la Federación. Recuperado de: https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5596023&fecha=02/07/2020#gsc.tab=0 (10.06.2024)
Heilprin, J. y Fletcher, R. (28.05.2022). WHA Approves New Strategy After Sexual Health Debate. World Health Assembly 75. Health Policy Watch. Recuperado de: https://healthpolicy-watch.news/wha-approves-new-strategy-after-sexual-health-debate/#:~:text=On%20its%20final%20day%20of,delegations%20skipping%20the%20vote%20altogether (09.02.2024)
Human Dignity Trust. Map of Countries that Criminalize LGBT People. Recuperado de: https://www.humandignitytrust.org/lgbt-the-law/map-of- criminalisation/?type_filter_submitted=&type_filter%5B%5D=crim_gender_exp (25.05.2024)
Instituto de los Mexicanos en el Exterior (05.2023). Población mexicana en Estados Unidos 2022. Recuperado de: https://nextcloud.sre.gob.mx/ index.php/s/yWBDWjfBkxaqpj5 (10.06.2024)
Instituto Nacional Electoral (08.2023). Estrategia Integral de Promoción Voto de las Mexicanas y los Mexicanos Residentes en el Extranjero 2023-2025. Recuperado de: https://repositoriodocumental.ine.mx/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/152814/CGor202308-25-ip-17.pdf
Janoff, D. (2021). The Emergence of Queer Diplomacy: Navigating Homophobia and LGBT Human Rights in International Relations. Carleton University
Lavers, M. (19.09.2023). Global anti-LGBTQ rights backlash overshadows UN General Assembly. Washington Blade. Recuperado de: https://www.washingtonblade.com/2023/09/19/global-anti-lgbtq-rights-backlash-overshadows-un-general-assembly (21.06.2024)
Malozzi, V. (29.11.2018). Se casa la primera pareja mexicana del mismo sexo bajo la ley de su país, pero en el extranjero. Recuperado de: https://www.nytimes.com/es/2018/11/29/espanol/matrimonio-igualitario-mexico-berezowsky-chavez-alor.html (25.04.2024).
Misión Permanente de México ante la Organización de Naciones Unidas (31.05.2016). México presenta su solicitud para ingresar al Grupo Núcleo de Naciones Unidas sobre derechos de la comunidad LGBT. Recuperado de: https://mision.sre.gob.mx/onu/images/discursos2016/31MAY2016LGBTFINAL.pdf (18.04.2024).
Misión Permanente de México ante las Naciones Unidas (21.01.2021). México refrenda en el Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU su apoyo al proceso de paz en Colombia, y exhorta el fortalecimiento de los componentes de género. Recuperado de: https://mision.sre.gob.mx/onu/index.php/comunicadosprensacsonu/1070-boletin-informativo-21-de-enero-de-2021-mexico-refrenda-en-el-csonu-su-apoyo-al-proceso-de-paz-en-colombia-y-exhorta-el-fortalecimiento-de-los-componentes-de-genero (23.04.2024).
Oficina del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Refugiados (2023). 74º reunión del Comité Ejecutivo de la Oficina del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Refugiados (ACNUR). Intervención de la Embajadora Francisca E. Méndez Escobar, Representante Permanente de México, en el debate general. Recuperado de: https://www.unhcr.org/media/general-debate-statements-mexico (25.03.2024).
Oficina del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Refugiados. Comité Ejecutivo para el Programa del Alto Comisionado. (21.12.2023). Standing Committee Eighty-eighth meeting.13 September 2023. EC/74/SC/SR.13
Oficina del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Refugiados. Comité Ejecutivo para el Programa del Alto Comisionado. (21.12.2023). Standing Committee Eighty-eighth meeting.13 September 2023. EC/74/SC/SR.14
Organización de los Estados Americanos. Convención Interamericana contra toda forma de discriminación e intolerancia. Recuperado de: https://www.oas.org/es/sla/ddi/docs/tratados_multilaterales_interamericanos_A-69_discriminacion_intolerancia.pdf (20.03.2024).
Organización de los Estados Americanos (03.06.2008). Derechos Humanos, Orientación Sexual e Identidad de Género. AG/RES.2435 (XXXVIII-O/08). Recuperado de: https://www.oas.org/es/sla/ddi/docs/AG-RES_2435_XXXVIII-O-08.pdf (20.03.2024).
Organización de los Estados Americanos (15.06.2016). Declaración conjunta de los miembros fundadores del Grupo de Apoyo LGBTI OEA. Recuperado de: https://www.oas.org/es/cidh/lgtbi/docs/declaracionconjunta-miembrosfundadores-grupoapoyo-lgbti-oea.pdf (20.03.2024).
Organización Internacional del Trabajo (13.06.2023). Record of Proceedings 3A- International Labour Conference -111th Session, Geneva, 2023. Recuperado de: https://www.ilo.org/resource/record-proceedings/ilc/111/report-finance-committee (04.04.2024).
Organización Internacional del Trabajo (2023). Programme and Budget for 2024–25. Recuperado de:
https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_mas/@program/documents/genericdocument/wcms_905532.pdf (04.04.2024).
Ortega, A. (11.07.2023). Discriminación y violencia laboral contra personas LGBT+ en México. Revista Nexos. Recuperado de: https://redaccion.nexos.com.mx/discriminacion-y-violencia-laboral-contra-personas-lgbt-en-mexico/ (22.02.2024).
Outright International (2023). Defending the Independent Expert On Protection Against Violence and Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity at the 71st Session of the United Nations General Assembly. Recuperado de: https://outrightinternational.org/sites/default/files/2023-10/Defending_the_Independent_Expert.pdf (20.06.2024)
Outright International (2021). Guide to Inclusion of LGBTI People in Development and Foreign Policy. Recuperado de: https://outrightinternational.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/GuideToInclusionRevised_Revised_OutrightInternational 4.pdf (23.11.2024)
Peribáñez, E. (2018). La ONU y los Derechos Humanos de las personas LGBTI+. Historia de un reconocimiento tardío. Revista de la Inquisición. Intolerancia y Derechos Humanos, 22, 471-498
Salinas, H. (2017). Matrimonio igualitario en México: la pugna por el Estado laico y la igualdad de derechos. El Cotidiano, 202, 95-104
Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores (01.09.2019). 1 Informe de Labores 2018-2019. Gobierno de México.
Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores (01.09.2020). 2 Informe de Labores 2019-2020. Gobierno de México.
Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores (01.09.2021). 3 Informe de Labores 2020-2021. Gobierno de México.
Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores (01.09.2022). 4 Informe de Labores 2021-2022. Gobierno de México.
Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores (01.09.2023). 5 Informe de Labores 2022-2023. Gobierno de México.
Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores (25.04.2023). México y Jamaica celebran la Décima Reunión de su Comisión Binacional Permanente. Recuperado de: https://www.gob.mx/sre/prensa/mexico-y-jamaica-celebran-la-decima-reunion-de-su-comision-binacional-permanente (14.03.2024).
Senado de la República. Coordinación de Comunicación Social. LXV Legislatura (26.04.2024). De dos a seis años de prisión para quien realice terapias de conversión sexual, aprueba el Senado. Recuperado de: https://comunicacionsocial.senado.gob.mx/informacion/comunicados/8890-de-dos-a-seis-anos-de-prision-para-quien-realice-terapias-de-conversion-sexual-aprueba-el-senado (07.05.2024).
Shaw. A. (02.06.2023). The global assault on LGBTQ rights undermines democracy. Recuperado de: https://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/the-world-today/2023-06/global-assault-lgbtq-rights-undermines-democracy (23.04.2024).
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación (12.2010). Acción de Inconstitucionalidad 2/2010. Semanario Judicial de la Federación y su Gaceta. Tomo XXXII. Recuperado de: https://bj.scjn.gob.mx/doc/ejecutoria/sHasl3cBN_4klb4HEKxv/*/documento (22.02.2024).
Thiel, M. (07.01.2018). Introducing Queer Theory in International Relations. Recuperado de: https://www.e-ir.info/pdf/72252 (10.06.2024).
Trispiotis, I. y Purshouse, C. (2022). ‘Conversion Therapy’ As Degrading Treatment. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 42 (1), 104-132.
Viniegra, T. (06.01.2024). Adopción Homoparental. México Libertario. Libertad, vida y propiedad privada. Recuperado de: https://mexicolibertario.org/adopcion-homoparental/ (22.02.2024).
Yurcaba, J. (17.12.2023). From drag bans to sports restrictions, 75 anti-LGBTQ bills have become law in 2023. NBC News. Recuperado de: https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/75-anti-lgbtq-bills-become-law-2023-rcna124250 (25.05.2024).
Zelada, C. (05.2020). ¿Son vinculantes las opiniones consultivas de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos? Una propuesta de reforma para un problema de antaño. Centro de Promoción y Defensa de los Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos. Recuperado de: https://promsex.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Son-vinculantes-las-opiniones-consultivas-de-la-Corte-IDH.pdf (26.06.2024).