Keywords:
Idndo-Pacific, China's rise, Eurocentrism, Postcolonial theory, Geopolitical dynamics, Regional governance, Global power shiftCopyright (c) 2024 Sergio Trigo Saugar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The Indo-Pacific region has become increasingly significant in the realm of contemporary international relations, largely due to China's rise as a major global player and its profound impact on the dynamics of power worldwide. However, traditional analyses of this region often exhibit inherent biases rooted in Eurocentric perspectives, neglecting the rich historical and cultural intricacies unique to the Indo-Pacific. This paper endeavors to conduct a critical examination of the intricate interplay between China's ascent and Eurocentrism within the realm of international relations, focusing specifically on the multifaceted dynamics unfolding in the Indo-Pacific. The Indo-Pacific region has garnered increasing attention in contemporary international relations, driven primarily by China's ascent as a significant global actor and its consequential influence on global power dynamics. Nevertheless, conventional approaches to analyzing this region tend to reflect inherent biases stemming from Eurocentric viewpoints, often overlooking the diverse historical narratives and cultural complexities that characterize the Indo-Pacific. This paper aims to undertake a comprehensive investigation into the complex relationship between China's rise and Eurocentrism within the realm of international relations, particularly emphasizing the nuanced dynamics unfolding in the Indo-Pacific. By delving into these intricacies, the study seeks to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the region's geopolitical landscape and its implications for global politics.
China's remarkable economic growth and its expanding sphere of influence have undeniably reshaped the geopolitical landscape of the Indo-Pacific. Nevertheless, the prevailing interpretations of China's rise predominantly emanate from Eurocentric vantage points, failing to adequately acknowledge the diverse historical trajectories and cultural complexities that characterize the Indo-Pacific region. By elucidating the inherent limitations of Eurocentrism in comprehending the Indo-Pacific's complexities, this section emphasizes the urgent necessity for cultivating a more nuanced understanding of China's role within the region.
Postcolonial approaches to international relations offer invaluable insights into the underlying power dynamics and discursive practices that underpin interactions within the Indo-Pacific. Through the deconstruction of colonial legacies and the interrogation of Western-centric narratives, postcolonial scholars shed light on the agency of formerly colonized nations and advocate for the establishment of a more inclusive and equitable global order. This section delves into the pertinence of postcolonial theory in elucidating the evolving dynamics of the Indo-Pacific and its broader implications for the field of international relations scholarship.
China's rapid economic growth and expanding influence have undoubtedly transformed the geopolitical landscape of the Indo-Pacific region. However, conventional analyses of China's rise often suffer from Eurocentric biases, which overlook the diverse historical trajectories and cultural complexities inherent to the Indo-Pacific. This section aims to highlight the limitations of Eurocentrism in understanding the nuances of the Indo-Pacific and advocates for a more nuanced approach to comprehending China's role within the region.
Eurocentric perspectives tend to prioritize Western experiences and frameworks, thereby neglecting the rich tapestry of histories and cultures that define the Indo-Pacific. By viewing China's ascent solely through a Eurocentric lens, analysts risk oversimplifying complex dynamics and overlooking significant factors that shape regional interactions. Therefore, there is an urgent need to challenge Eurocentric narratives and adopt a more inclusive approach that considers the diverse perspectives and experiences of Indo-Pacific nations.
Postcolonial approaches to international relations offer valuable insights into the power dynamics and discursive practices that underpin interactions within the Indo-Pacific. By interrogating the legacies of colonialism and imperialism, postcolonial scholars highlight the agency of formerly colonized nations and emphasize the importance of decolonizing knowledge production in international relations. In the context of the Indo-Pacific, postcolonial theory provides a framework for understanding the region's complex history of colonization, decolonization, and postcolonial state-building efforts.
Furthermore, postcolonial theory encourages scholars to critically examine Western-centric narratives that often marginalize non-Western perspectives. By deconstructing dominant discourses, postcolonial scholars challenge hegemonic power structures and advocate for a more inclusive and equitable global order. In the context of the Indo-Pacific, this entails recognizing the diverse voices and experiences of nations within the region and acknowledging their contributions to shaping contemporary international relations.
The emergence of the Chinese School of International Relations presents a compelling alternative to the prevalent Eurocentric perspectives, particularly concerning the Indo-Pacific region. Anchored in Chinese philosophical traditions and historical experiences, this school offers unique insights into China's foreign policy objectives and its overarching vision for regional and global governance. By dissecting the foundational principles and core tenets of the Chinese School, this section endeavors to elucidate its profound implications for comprehending the geopolitical landscape of the Indo-Pacific in a more holistic manner.
The burgeoning influence of Beijing in the Indo-Pacific arena poses significant questions regarding the nature of power and China's evolving role in shaping regional affairs. Through a comprehensive analysis of Beijing's strategic initiatives, economic engagements, and diplomatic endeavors, this section seeks to justify China's burgeoning power and its evolving role within the Indo-Pacific context. Furthermore, it delves into the multifaceted implications of China's ascent for regional stability, security dynamics, and the broader international order, thereby offering valuable insights into the evolving dynamics of the Indo-Pacific region on the global stage. The increasing influence of Beijing in the Indo-Pacific region raises crucial questions about the nature of power and China's evolving position in shaping regional dynamics. By conducting an in-depth analysis of Beijing's strategic initiatives, economic engagements, and diplomatic efforts, this paper aims to provide a robust justification for China's growing power and its evolving role within the Indo-Pacific context. Through examining China's multifaceted approach to regional engagement, including its Belt and Road Initiative, maritime expansion efforts, and diplomatic maneuvers, this study seeks to illuminate the sources and implications of China's burgeoning influence.
Furthermore, the paper delves into the complex implications of China's ascent for regional stability, security dynamics, and the broader international order. China's expanding presence in the Indo-Pacific has generated both opportunities and challenges for regional actors and the global community alike. While Beijing's economic investments and infrastructure projects contribute to regional development and connectivity, they also raise concerns about debt dependency and geopolitical competition. Additionally, China's assertive behavior in territorial disputes and military buildup in the South China Sea have heightened tensions and prompted responses from neighboring countries and other global powers.
In light of these developments, understanding China's role in the Indo-Pacific is crucial for navigating the evolving geopolitical landscape and promoting stability and cooperation in the region. By analyzing the various dimensions of China's engagement, this paper seeks to offer valuable insights into the complexities of Indo-Pacific dynamics and their implications for broader international relations. Ultimately, a nuanced understanding of China's power and influence in the Indo-Pacific is essential for formulating effective policy responses and fostering constructive engagement among regional stakeholders and global actors.
In summary, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the complex interplay between China's rise and Eurocentrism within the realm of international relations, with a specific focus on the Indo-Pacific region. By critically examining these dynamics through the lenses of postcolonial theory and the Chinese School of International Relations, this study endeavors to offer valuable insights into the evolving geopolitical landscape of the Indo-Pacific and its broader implications for global power dynamics.
Downloads
References
Acharya, A. (2004). Will Asia's Past Be Its Future? International Security, 28 (3), 149-164.
Acharya, A. (2011a). Normative subsidiarity and regional orders: sovereignty, regionalism, and rulemaking in the third world. Quarterly International Studies, 55 (1), 95–123.
Acharya, A. (2011b). Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism. Cornell University Press.
Acharya, A. (2014). Global international relations (IR) and regional worlds: A new agenda for international studies. Quarterly International Studies, 58 (4), 647-659.
Acharya, A. (2016). Advancing International Relations: Challenges, Controversies, and Contributions. International Studies Review, 18 (1), 4-15.
Acharya, A. y Buzan, B. (2007). Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7 (3), 287-312.
Acharya, A. y Buzan, B. (2019). The Making of Global International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
Allison, G. (2017). Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Bose, S. y Horizons, A.H. (2006). The Indian Ocean in the Age of Global Empire. Harvard University Press.
Breslin, S. (2021). China Resurrected? Studying Chinese Global Power. Bristol University Press.
Bull, H., y Watson, A. (1984). The Expansion of International Society. Clarendon Press.
Buzan, B. y Lawson, G. (2014). Rethinking Benchmark Dates in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 20 (2), 437-462.
Buzan, B. y Lawson, G. (2015). The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and Making of International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
Callahan, W.A. (2008). Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-Hegemonic or a New Hegemony? International Studies Review, 10 (4), 749-761.
Callahan, W.A. (2015). History, Tradition, and China's Dream: Socialist Modernization in the World of Great Harmony. Journal of Contemporary China, 24 (96), 983-1001.
Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.
Cox, R.W. (1983). Gramsci, Hegemony, and International Relations: An Essay in Method. Millennium, 12 (2), 162-175.
Cox, R.W. (1987). Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. Columbia University Press.
Cox, M. (2012). Power Shifts, Economic Change, and the Decline of the West? International Relations, 26 (4), 369-388.
Dian, M. (2017). Contested Memories in Chinese and Japanese Foreign Policy. Elsevier.
Dian, M. y Menegazzi, S. (2018). New Regional Initiatives in China’s Foreign Policy: Incoming Pluralism of Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
Dian, M. y Meijer, H. (2020). Network Hegemony: Alliance Dynamics in East Asia. International Politics, 57 (2), 131-149.
Fairbank, J.K. y Chen, T.T. (1968). In the Chinese World Order: Traditional China's Foreign Relations. Harvard University Press.
Feng, L. y Ruonan, L. (2019). China, the United States, and Order Transition in East Asia: An Economy-Security Nexus Approach. The Pacific Review, 32 (6), 972-995.
Foot, R. (2020). The Rise of China and American Hegemony: Renegotiating Regional Order in East Asia. International Politics, 57 (2), 150-165.
Friedberg, A. (2000). Will Europe's Past Be Asia's Future? Survival, 42 (3), 147-160.
Gill, S. (1993). Gramsci, Historical Materialism, and International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
Gilpin, R.G. (1984). The richness of the tradition of political realism. International Organization, 38 (2), 287-304.
Goh, E. (2019). US Dominance and American Bias in International Relations Scholarship: A View from the Outside. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4 (3), 402-410.
Hagström, L. y Nordin, A.H. (2019). China’s ‘Harmony’ Politics and the Pursuit of Soft Power in International Politics. International Studies Review, 22 (3), 507-525.
Hobson, J.M. (2012). The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge University Press.
Hobson, J.M. y Sajed, A. (2017). Navigating Beyond the Eurofetishist Frontier of Critical Theory in International Relations: Exploring the Complex Landscapes of Non-Western Agency. International Studies Review, 19 (4), 547-572.
Hopf, T. (2013). Common-Sense Constructivism and Hegemony in World Politics. International Organization, 67 (2), 317-354.
Hsiao, H.-H.M., y Lin, C.-Y. (2008). Rise of China: Beijing’s Strategies and Implications for the Asia-Pacific. Routledge.
Hurrell, A. (2016). Beyond Critique: How to Study Global IR? International Studies Review, 18 (1), 149-151.
Hutchings, K. (2007). Happy Anniversary! Time and Critique in International Relations Theory. International Studies Review, 33 (1), 71-89.
Hwang, Y.J. (2021). Reevaluation of the Chinese School of International Relations: A Postcolonial Perspective. International Studies Review, 47 (3), 311-330.
Ikenberry, G.J. y Nexon, D.H. (2019). Hegemony Studies 3.0: The Dynamics of Hegemonic Orders. Security Studies, 28 (3), 395-421.
Johnston, A.I. (2012). What Does (If Anything) East Asia Tell Us About International Relations Theory? Annual Review of Political Science, 15 (1), 53-78.
Kang, D.C. (2003). Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks. International Security, 27 (4), 57-85.
Kang, D.C. (2010). Hierarchy and Legitimacy in International Systems: The Tribute System in Early Modern East Asia. Security Studies, 19 (4), 591-622.
Kang, D.C. (2017). American Grand Strategy and East Asian Security in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge University Press.
Kang, D.C. y Lin, A.Y.T. (2019). US Bias in the Study of Asian Security: Using Europe to Study Asia. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4 (3), 393-401.
Kayaoglu, T. (2010). Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory. International Studies Review, 12 (2), 193-217.
Kelly, R.E. (2012). A 'Confucian Long Peace' in Pre-Western East Asia? European Journal of International Relations, 18 (3), 407-430.
Li, M. (2019). China’s Economic Power in Asia: The Belt and Road Initiative and the Role of Guangxi Local Government. Asian Perspective, 43 (2), 273-295.
Ling, L.H. (2014). The Dao of World Politics: Towards a Post-Westphalian, Worldist International Relations. Routledge.
Ling, L.H. (2016). What's in a Name? A Critical Interrogation of the Chinese School of International Relations. En Yongjing, Z. Constructing a Chinese School(s) of IR: Ongoing Debates and Critical Assessment. Routledge.
MacDonald, P.K. y Lake, D.A. (2008). The Role of Hierarchy in International Politics. International Security, 32 (4), 171-180.
Mattern, J.B., y Zarakol, A. (2016). Hierarchies in World Politics. International Organization, 70 (3), 623-654.
McConaughey, M., Musgrave, P., y Nexon, D.H. (2018). Beyond Anarchy: Political Logics, Hierarchy, and International Structure. International Theory, 10 (2), 181-218.
Neufeld, M.A. (1995). The Restructuring of International Relations Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Nordin, A.H. (2016). China’s International Relations and a Harmonious World: Time, Space, and Multiplicity in World Politics. Routledge.
Osiander, A. (2001). Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth. International Organization, 55 (2), 251-287.
Persaud, R. y Sajed, A. (2018). Race, Gender, and Culture in International Relations: Postcolonial Perspectives. Routledge.
Phillips, A. y Sharman, J.C. (2015). International Order in Diversity: War, Trade and Rule in the Indian Ocean. Cambridge University Press.
Phillips, A. (2016a). Global International Relations Meets Global History: Sovereignty, Modernity, and the Making of International System in the Indian Ocean Region. International Studies Review, 18 (1), 62-77.
Phillips, A. (2016b). The global transformation, multiple early modernities, and international systems change. International Politics, 8 (3), 481-491.
Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation. Bacon Press.
Quijano, A. (1992). Colonialidad y Modernidad/Racionalidad. Perú Indígena, 13 (29), 11-20.
Quijano, A. (2020). Cuestiones y horizontes: de la dependencia histórico-estructural a la colonialidad/descolonialidad del poder. CLACSO Lima.
Qin, Y. (2008). Racionalidad y cooperación internacional: un estudio de la teoría liberal de las relaciones internacionales. Editorial del conocimiento mundial.
Qin, Y. (2010). International Society as a Process: Institutions, Identities, and China’s Peaceful Rise. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3 (2), 129-153.
Qin, Y. (2011). Development of International Relations theory in China: progress through debates. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11 (2), 231-257.
Qin, Y. (2018). A relational theory of world politics. Cambridge University Press.
Ramírez Ruiz, R., Debasa, F., Núñez de Prado, S. (2017). Historia de Asia Contemporánea y Actual. Editorial Universitas.
Ramírez Ruiz, R. (2018). Historia Contemporánea de China. Editorial Síntesis.
Said, E. (1996). Cultura e imperialismo. Editorial Anagrama.
Tickner, A.B. (2013). Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19 (3), 627-646.
Waltz, K.N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill.
Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Wendt, A. (2016). Agents, Structures, and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge University Press.
Yan, X. (2011). Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power. Princeton University Press.
Yong, T.W. y Peng, K.K. (2016). Confucianism and Spiritual Traditions in Modern China and Beyond. Palgrave Macmillan.
Yong, T.W. y Zhang, C.J. (2018). Confucian Philosophy and Modern Society. Palgrave Macmillan.
Yong, T.W. y Lo, Y.C.J. (2018). Confucianism, Ethics, and Democracy. Springer.
Yong, T.W. y Yang, S.L. (2019). Confucianism in Modern China: Classic Reassessments. Routledge.
Yong, T.W. (2020). Confucian China and Its Modern Fate: Volume Three: The Problem of Confucian Culture. Routledge.
Yong, T.W. (2021). Confucianism and the World: The Essential Ideas. Palgrave Macmillan.
Yongjing, Z. y Chang, T.C. (2016). Building a Chinese School of International Relations: Debates and Sociological Realities. Routledge.
Zakaria, F. (2008). The Post-American World. WW Norton & Company.
Zarakol, A. (2010). After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, S. (2013). China's Ascent: Power, Security, and the Future of International Politics. Cornell University Press.
Zhang, S. (2021). Understanding Chinese Grand Strategy: Past, Present, and Future. Oxford University Press.
Zhao, T. (2006). The Evolution of Chinese Political Thought: From Confucianism to Modernity. Routledge.
Zhao, T. (2009). A Political World Philosophy in terms of All-under-heaven (Tian-xia). Diogenes, 56 (1), 5-18.
Zhao, T. (2010). China and the World: Balancing Act in the Chinese Elite's Foreign Policy Discourse. Journal of Contemporary China, 19 (2), 1-21.
Zhao, T. y Dallmayr, F. (2012). Contemporary Chinese Political Thought: Debates and Perspectives. University Press of Kentucky.
Zhao, T. (2013). Confucian Values and Modern Governance in China. Palgrave Macmillan.
Zhao, T. (2016). Debating Political Order in China: Five Schools of Thought on Politics, Confucianism, Legalism, Marxism-Leninism, and the Chinese National Essence. Springer.
Zhao, T. (2019). The Tianxia system: An introduction to the philosophy of a world institution. China International Press.