The nexus between human trafficking and forced displacement induced by conflict from an intersectional feminist approach
Keywords:
Forced migration, human trafficking, conflict, human rights, intersectionality, vulnerabilityCopyright (c) 2023 Waldimeiry Correa da Silva, Gracia Sumariva Reyes
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This research article examines the complex nexus between forced migration due to conflict and human trafficking (HT). The primary objective of this investigation is to expose how nationality and gender can be considered factors that increase vulnerability and risk of HT. Forced displacement occurs when a person or group of people is forced to flee their home or usual place of residence to avoid the effects of a situation of generalised violence, such as armed conflict, natural disasters, or massive human rights violations. The complex context in which conflict-induced forced migration takes place, as it is exposed in the article, can be a fertile ground for the emergence of HT. Article 3 of the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Girls, supplementing the Convention against Transnational Organised Crime, defines HT as the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability; or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation.
In recent years, the link between forced migration, conflict and HT has received increasing attention from the international community. It has been recognised as a direct consequence of the humanitarian crisis caused by armed conflict, as evidenced by several Security Council resolutions. In spite of this acknowledgment, however, little research examines the unique vulnerabilities and experiences of people caught in this devastating nexus from an intersectional perspective, focusing on how issues such as nationality and gender interact in these situations.
To respond to this research gap, the article departs from a feminist poscolonial approach. Critical feminist approaches, especially intersectional feminism, highlight the importance of examining systems of oppression, discrimination and domination in order to fully understand the complexity of global problems. The concept of intersectionality points to how different forms of discrimination overlap and condition people's experiences and opportunities, leading to social injustice. Intersectionality starts from a situated context, both spatially and temporally, that recognises the particularities of interconnected experiences of oppression and vulnerability, creating a "matrix of domination" (Collins, 1993). Intersectionality thus allows us to uncover the production of inequality in social, political and institutional structures (Hancock, 2007). Specifically, in the case of HT, intersectionality allows us to move beyond geopolitical and economic considerations to address how social hierarchies and systemic inequalities can make certain groups particularly vulnerable to exploitation.
Methodologically, the article elaborates two case studies to explore the forced migrations-human trafficking nexus from an intersectional approach. The 2014 civil war in Iraq and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine are undertaken to explore the nexus and uncover shared and unique intersectional factors contributing to the risk of human trafficking among forced migrants due to conflicts. These cases have been selected because of the relevance of their conflicts, which generated massive, forced migration, and opportunities for human trafficking networks. These cases offer a gendered perspective on trafficking and allow for an analysis of structures of racial oppression in diverse geopolitical contexts, providing a more complete understanding of the intersection between forced migration and human trafficking. This examination offers a more nuanced understanding of the complexities involved in the intersection of forced migration and human trafficking.
Our analysis shows that the situation of armed conflict increases the vulnerability to HT of individuals in a mobility process. Armed conflicts increase vulnerability to human trafficking because of the poverty, inequality, lack of opportunity and violence they generate. Human insecurity makes people more susceptible to exploitation. Moreover, in these situations, trafficking becomes a highly profitable business for traffickers due to high demand and the weakening of the state. A person's ability to move and cross borders freely increases his or her vulnerability to being a victim of HT. Nationality and ties to the West or the periphery can determine a person's ability to migrate freely and his or her degree of vulnerability to SHR. The disparity in EU responses to the migration crises of both conflicts highlights how the mobility of people from the periphery is restricted and regulated, increasing their risk to HT. Furthermore, an individual's gender also affects their vulnerability to falling into HT in these contexts. Women and girls, who are highly disempowered in armed conflicts, are the main targets of traffickers of THB in these situations. They also face additional gender risks both during migration and in refugee camps. Moreover, the implications of HT for women's security go beyond the spatio-temporal constraints of war and migration. Not only does HT negatively affect women's security, but it also increases the risk of women relapsing back into TSH (Healey, 2019), posing an additional vulnerability factor. In light of this, the intersectional perspective highlights that women from the periphery have a high vulnerability to HT due to mobility restrictions and lack of protection. The intersectional perspective allows us to approach HT in a gender- and nationality-sensitive way and to explore the intersections between the two. The background of individuals and their gender are intertwined and reinforce their negative effects on the vulnerability to HT of victims at the centre of this intersection (Chapkins, 2003; Kempadoo, 2004). Hence, minority groups of women, such as Yazidi women in the Iraq war (Healey, 2019) or Roma women in the case of the Ukrainian war (UNODC, 2022), are found to be exorbitantly vulnerable to falling prey to trafficking networks. This is because they are discriminated against based on their nationality and are denied the right to freedom of movement, recognition as refugees, and/or international protection.
The article is structured in four sections. The introduction provides an overview of the purpose of the research, explains our intersectional feminist approach, offers a conceptual framework relating to conflict-related forced displacement and HT, and introduces the selected case studies. The second section conducts the case analysis and highlights the nexus between forced migration and SHR in the context of Iraq and Ukraine, paying particular attention to vulnerabilities related to nationality and gender. This section is divided into three subsections. In the first, we will analyse the link between forced migration and HT in both conflicts. In the second, we will focus on how race increases the vulnerability of forcibly displaced persons to being victims of HT. Gender-based vulnerabilities will be discussed in the third subsection. The third part sets out the implications for vulnerability that arise from the intersection of the different factors analysed that result in intersectional discrimination. The conclusion reflects on the implications for policies to address HT.
By highlighting the unique vulnerabilities and challenges forced migrants face due to the intersection of factors like race and gender, the research provides insights to policymakers and organizations working in the field of human trafficking prevention and mitigation. The study challenges traditional, reductionist approaches to tackling human trafficking and calls for a more nuanced, intersectional understanding that recognizes the multi-dimensional nature of forced migrant experiences. It calls for a shift in perspectives, from state-centered approaches that prioritize border control and criminalization to more human-centered policies that prioritize the safety and well-being of people. In other words, policy adjustments that consider the complex interaction of factors leading to human trafficking, including the pressing reality of armed conflict and the consequent forced migration, as well as the impact of intersecting vulnerabilities based on race and gender.
Downloads
References
ACNUR (2016). Global Trends in Forced Displacement 2016.
ACNUR (2021). Global Trends in Forced Displacement 2020.
ACNUR (2023). Global Trends in Forced Displacement 2022.
Amnistía Internacional (20.03.2017). El acuerdo UE-Turquía, un año de vergüenza para Europa. Recuperado de: https://www.amnesty.org/es/latest/news/2017/03/the-eu-turkey-deal-europes-year-of-shame/ (14.06.2023).
Andrijasevic, R. (2007). Beautiful dead bodies: gender, migration and representation in anti-trafficking campaigns. Feminist Review, (86), 24-44.
Aradau, C. (2008). Rethinking Trafficking in Women: Politics out of Security. Palgrave.
Brah, A. y Phoenix, A. (2004). Ain’t I A Woman? Revisiting Intersectionality. Journal of International Women's Studies, 5 (3), 75-86.
CARE International (2022). Rapid Gender Analysis in Ukraine. Recuperado de: https://www.careevaluations.org/wp-content/uploads/Ukraine-Rapid-Gender-Analysis-Brief-Final.pdf.
Carroll, J. (2020). Preventing Human Trafficking in Humanitarian Emergencies. UNICEF USA.
CEDAW (2020). Recomendación general núm. 38 relativa a la trata de mujeres y niñas en el contexto de la migración mundial. CEDAW/C/GC/38.
Chapkins, W. (2003). Trafficking, migration and the law. Protecting innocents, punishing migrants. Gender and Society, 17 (6), 923-937.
Cockbain, E. y Sidebottom, A. (2022). The war in Ukraine and associated risks of human trafficking and exploitation: Insights from an evidence-gathering roundtable. Office of the Independent Anti- Slavery Commissioner.
Collins, H.P. (1993). Toward a new vision: race, class and gender as categories of analysis and connection. Race, Sex and Class, 1 (1), 25-45.
Consejo de Derechos humanos de Naciones Unidas (2014). Resolución A/HRC/26/37 sobre el Informe de la Relatora Especial sobre la trata de personas, especialmente mujeres y niños, Joy Ngozi Ezeilo.
Consejo de Derechos humanos de Naciones Unidas (2016). Resolución A/HRC/32/CRP.2 sobre el Informe de la Comisión Internacional Independiente de Investigación sobre la República Árabe Siria. “‘They Came to Destroy’’: ISIS Crimes Against the Yazidis”.
Consejo de Derechos humanos de Naciones Unidas (2019). Resolución A/HRC/41/46 sobre el Informe de la Relatora Especial sobre la trata de personas, especialmente mujeres.
Consejo de Derechos humanos de Naciones Unidas (2020). Resolución A/HRC/44/45 sobre el Informe de la Relatora Especial sobre la trata de personas, especialmente mujeres y nin?os.
Consejo de Derechos humanos de Naciones Unidas (2022). Resolución A/HRC/RES/49/1 sobre el Informe de la Comisión Internacional Independiente de Investigación sobre Ucrania.
Consejo de Seguridad de Naciones Unidas (2016). Resolución 2331 del Consejo de Seguridad de Naciones Unidas, S/RES/2331, (20 de diciembre de 2016).
Consejo de Seguridad de Naciones Unidas (2017). Resolución 2388 del Consejo de Seguridad de Naciones Unidas, S/RES/2388, (21 de noviembre de 2017).
Correa da Silva, W. (2022a). Régimen Internacional de Enfrentamento ao Tráfico de Pessoas. Avanços e Desafíos para a proteçao dos Direitos Humanosd. Lumen Juris.
Correa da Silva, W. (2022b). Teorías Críticas del Derecho y Feminismo Postcolonial: La Necesaria Revisión De La Praxis Normativa Sobre La Trata De Persona. Revista General de Derecho Público Comparado, 31, 1-26.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, (1989), 139-167.
Departamento de Estado de Estados Unidos (2015). Trafficking in Persons Report-July 2015.
Doezema, J. (1998). Foced to choose: beyond the voluntary v. forced prostitution dichotomy. En Kempadoo, K. y
Doezema, J. (Eds.). Global sex workers: rights, resistance and redefinition (pp. 34-50). Routledge.
Elliott, S. (2018). Human Trafficking in Humanitarian Crises. The Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime.
Fallon, K., Cundy, A. y Crean, R. (24.03.2022). Vigilantes stalk Ukraine border as sex traffickers target fleeing women and children. The Guardian.
Gallagher, A.T. (2010). The International Law of Human Trafficking. Cambridge University Press.
Gallagher, A.T. y McAdam, M. (2018). Abuse of a position of vulnerability within the definition of trafficking persons. En Piotrowicz, R., Rijken, C. y Heide Uhl, B. (Eds.). Routledge Handbook on Human Trafficking (pp. 185-197). Routledge.
Garelli, G. y Tazzioli, M. (26.02.2016). The EU hotspot approach at Lampedusa. Open Democracy. Recuperado de: www.opendemocracy.net/can-europe-make-it/glenda-garelli-martina-tazzioli/eu-hotspot- approach-at-lampedusa
GBV Subcluster (27.04.2022). Gender-Based Violence in Ukraine. Secondary Data Review. Recuperado de: https://gbvaor.net/sites/default/files/2022-05/Ukraine%20GBV%20SDR%20%2025%205%2022%20Final%20format%20amended.pdf
Gómez Montoya, R. (2021). La violencia sexual en conflictos armados: un arma de guerra fuera del control de la legalidad internacional (Tesis doctoral). Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.
Gurung, A. y Clark, A. (2018). The perfect storm: The impact of disaster severity on internal human trafficking. International Area Studies Review, 1-21.
Hancock, A. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, (5), 63-79.
Healy, C. (2019). The Strength to Carry On: Resilence and Vulnerability to Trafficking and Other Abuses among People Travelling Along Migration Routes to Europe. ICMPD.
Henley & Partners (2023). The Henley Passport Index. Recuperado de: https://www.henleyglobal.com/passport-index
Higel, L. (2016). Iraq’s displacement crisis: security and protection. Ceasefire Centre for Civilian Rights and Minority Rights Group International.
Hoff, S. y de Volder, E. (2022). Preventing human trafficking of refugees from Ukraine. A rapid assessment of risks and gaps in the anti-trafficking response. La Strada International.
Hovil, L. (2018). Conflict, Displacement, and Refugees. En Aola?, F.N., Cahn, N., Haynes, D.F. y Valji, N. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Conflict (pp. 276-287). Oxford Press.
Iglesias Berlanga, M. (2021). La trata de menores en los conflictos armados desde un enfoque basado en los derechos humanos. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, 41, 1-36.
Ineli Ciger, M. (06.10.2022). Reasons for the Activation of the Temporary Protection Directive in 2022: A Tale of Double Standards. ASILE-Global Asylum Governance and the European Union’s Role. Recuperado de: https://www.asileproject.eu/reasons-for-the-activation-of-the-temporary-protection-directive-in-2022-a-tale-of-double-standards/
International Centre for Migration Policy Development (2016). Targeting Vulnerabilities: The Impact of the Syrian War and Refugee Situation on Trafficking in Persons: A Study of Syria, Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan and Iraq. ICMPD.
Kempadoo, K. (2005). From moral panic to global justice: changing perspectives on trafficking. En Kempadoo, K., Sanghera, J. y Pattanaik, B. (Eds.). Trafficking and prostitution reconsidered, new perspectives on migration, sex work, and human rights (pp. 7-24). Boulder.
Kempadoo, K. (2015). The Modern-Day White (Wo)Man’s Burden: Trends in Anti-Trafficking and Anti-Slavery Campaigns. Journal of Human Trafficking, 1, 8-20.
Locke, R. (2012). Organized crime, Conflict, and Fragility: A New Approach. International Peace Institute.
Lungarotti, L., Craggs, S. y Tillinac, A. (2015). Human Trafficking in Crises: A Neglected Protection Concern. Humanitarian Practice Network.
Makkonen, T. (2002). Multiple, compound and Intersectional discrimination: bringing the experiences of the most marginalized to the fore. Institute for Human Rights, Abo Akademi University.
Malik, N. (2017). Trafficking terror: How Modern Slavery and Sexual Violence fund Terrorism. The Henry Jackson Society.
Migration Data Portal (2020). Human Trafficking. Immigration and Emigration statistics. MDP.
Nelson, S., Guthrie, J. y Sumner, P. (2004). Literature Review and Analysis Related to Human Trafficking in Post-Conflict Situations. USAID.
Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito (2017). Global Report on Trafficking in Persons.
Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito (2018a). Countering Trafficking in Persons in Conflict Situations.
Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito (2018b). Informe Mundial sobre la Trata de Personas.
Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito (2019). Nota Informativa sobre la lucha contra la trata de personas en situaciones de conflicto.
Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito (2022). Global Report on Trafficking in Persons.
Organización Internacional para las Migraciones (2015). Addressing Human Trafficking and Exploitation in Times of Crisis. Evidence and Recommendations for further action to protect vulnerable and mobile populations.
Organización de las Naciones Unidas (1998). Derechos humanos, éxodos en masa y personas desplazadas. Informe del Representante del Secretario General, Sr. Francis M. Deng, presentado con arreglo a la resolución 1997/39 de la Comisión de Derechos humanos. E/CN.4/1998/53/Add.2 (11 de febrero de 1998).
Plataforma de Solidaridad de la Unión Europea (06.05.2022). A Common Anti-Trafficking Plan to address the risks of trafficking in human beings and support potential victims among those fleeing the war in Ukraine. Recuperado de: https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-05/Anti-Trafficking%20Plan_en.pdf
Ruiz-Giménez Arrieta, I. (2017). El naufragio de Europa: reflexiones feministas en torno a la crisis de las políticas migratorias y de asilo. Revista Europea de Derechos Fundamentales, 29, 143-164.
Servicio de Acción Exterior de la Unión Europea (25.11.2022). From awareness to accountability: END GENDER BASED VIOLENCE NOW!”– Ukraine. Joint statement in observance of the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women on November 25, and the accompanying 16 Days of Activism Against Gender-Based Violence. Recuperado de: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ukraine/%E2%80%9C-awareness-accountability-end-gender-based-violence-now%E2%80%9D-ukraine_en?s=232 (10.06.2023).
Sharma, N. (2005). Anti-trafficking rhetoric and the making of a global apartheid. NWSA Journal, (17), 88-111.
Shelley, L. (2010). Human Trafficking: A Global Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Shtefan, A.G. (2022). El conflicto ruso-ucraniano: una aproximación desde la geopolítica. Acta Republicana. Política y sociedad, 21, 115-128.
Van Veel, E., Di Pietrantonio Pellise, A., Ezzeddine, N., y Napolitano, P. (2021). Band-aids, not bullets. EU policies and interventions in the Syrian and Iraqi civil wars. Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’.