Transfer of the international gender agenda to the state of Chile: roles, facilitators and obstacles
Keywords:
public gender policies, international gender agenda, institucional feminism, public policy dissemination studies, international organizationsCopyright (c) 2022 Camila Troncoso Zúñiga
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The following paper analyzes the transfer process of the international agenda on women's rights to the Chilean State during the years 1990 to 2019. The specific objectives of the research are to identify the relevant agendas from the position of those involved in this process. The analysis is based on a theoretical approach that incorporates the studies of diffusion and transfer of public policies, and which is detailed first. From a methodological point of view, process tracing was used to collect the information, which allows us to account for the motivations, perceptions and interests of those who make the decisions and create narratives regarding the transfer. For this purpose, a documentary review and semi-structured interviews were conducted with key figures from international organizations (UN Women, ECLAC Gender Affairs Division), political authorities of the mechanism for the advancement of women (former National Service for Women and Gender Equity and since 2015 Ministry of Women and Gender Equity), public officials belonging to the mechanism since the early 1990s (from the Department of International Relations and other units in charge of mainstreaming gender in the State), and members of the feminist movement (including interviews with Corporación Humanas and La Morada).
The article introduces the topic by referring to the possibility of public policies and the state to transform or maintain gender relations, in so far as the activity carried out by the state is not neutral. In this sense, the feminist movement and women's organizations have played a fundamental role in demanding transformative action from the state, and in contributing to the development of the international agenda on gender issues. The article also briefly describes the development of the international agenda on women's rights since the last decades of the 20th century, including binding legal instruments at the universal and regional levels, such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW, 1979) and the Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment and Eradication of Violence against Women (1994). Moreover, it examines the political commitments adopted by states at international conferences (United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, the World Conference on Women and the Regional Conference on Women in Latin America and the Caribbean, among others), which have specific follow-up mechanisms. Subsequently, the political context of the State of Chile and the role played by the feminist movement during the different governments are contextualized.
The results of the research conducted are then presented, establishing which international agendas have been relevant during the period from the positions occupied by the different relevant actors identified. This includes both those that are binding and those that generate political commitments from the States, mainly the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, the CEDAW, the Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment and Eradication of Violence against Women and the Montevideo Strategy for the Implementation of the Regional Gender Agenda; a difference is established between the content of certain agendas and the milestones for reporting to the follow-up mechanisms, which may have greater or lesser influence depending on the case. For instance, reporting to the CEDAW Committee isonsidered a relevant milestone, but not the recommendations issued by that treaty body.
Finally, we conclude by recognizing the main elements of the research results, including who intervenes and what roles the international agenda plays from the different positions occupied by the identified actors (high political authority, public officials, from international organizations and from the institutional feminist movement). In this sense, we conclude by determining that the role played by the international agenda has different functions for individuals depending on the position in which they find themselves: for senior political authorities, the international agenda does not mark a milestone that represents a before and after, but rather supports processes that are taking place at the national level; on the other hand, for public officials, the international agenda plays a more important role, in that it is capable of transmitting new ideas, through which public policy is developed; while for civil society, the international agenda is used to pressure States, and milestones that mark a before and after are recognized. The role of international conferences is recognized by all interviewees as a mediating and supportive role.
In turn, the feminist movement identifies certain milestones as fundamental (IV World Conference on Women), but others are less relevant, such as the Consensuses emanating from the Regional Conferences on Women in Latin America and the Caribbean or the Declarations of the Legal and Social Commission on Women. With respect to Security Council Resolution 1325, it is noted that for the feminist movement this did not constitute a strong demand and that it was implemented due to the will and knowledge of the officials in charge. The relevance of the Belém do Pará Convention in the transmission of new knowledge is recognized by all, particularly for those who did not come from the feminist movement, as those who did had already incorporated the notions of violence from that treaty. In turn, with respect to the CEDAW,the presentation of reports by the state and civil society are all recognized as a milestone. However, it is also recognized that there is a lack of adequate implementation of the concluding observations regarding the examination of the state by the Committee, and this ends up being used by those who have knowledge on the subject.
Likewise, from a critical analysis, certain final reflections are presented which, rather than closing the research topic, leave the way open to continue expanding the transfer of public policies and the implementation of international recommendations. In particular, this includes the role that institutional feminism can play so that we can speak of intersectional and transformative public policies of gender relations and not of maintaining the status quo. This remains the goal considering that since the beginning of the 90s public policies have sought to eliminate discrimination and structural violence, and yet this continues to persist.
Downloads
References
Abril Stoffels, R. (2019). The role of the CEDAW Committee in the implementation of public policies on gender issues: analysis through a study of the protection of girls’ rights in Spain. International Journal of Human Rights, 23 (8), 1317-1336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1603144
Alfama, E. (2015). Género, poder y administración pública: sobre la (im)posibilidad del cambio hacia una mayor igualdad. Una revisión de literatura. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 39, 263-287.
Araya, J.P. (2016a). Influencia burocrática en la formulación de políticas públicas: el caso del Sistema de Alta Dirección Pública en Chile. Revista de Ciencia Política, 54 (2), 277-298.
Araya, J.P. (2016b). La burocracia como élite: el eslabón perdido en los estudios sobre elites gubernamentales en Chile. Revista de Gestión Pública, 2 (V), 253-282.
Beach, D. y Pedersen, R. (septiembre, 2011). What is process tracing actually tracing? The three variants of process tracing methods and their uses and limitations. Ponencia presentada en el APSA Annual Meeting Seattle, Washington.
Becerra, M. (2002). Cómo tomar en cuenta las experiencias de otros: un análisis de la transferencia de políticas públicas. Gaceta ecológica, 63, 75-83.
Bidegain, N. (2017). La agenda 2030 y la Agenda Regional de Género: sinergias para la igualdad en América Latina y el Caribe. Serie Asuntos de Género CEPAL, 143, 1-75.
Bril-Mascarenhas, T., Maillet, A. y Mayaux, P.L. (2017). Process traicing: inducción, deducción e inferencia causal. Revista Ciencia Política, 37 (3), 659-684.
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2017a). 40 años de la agenda regional de género (LC/G.2682/REV.1). CEPAL.
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2017b). Estrategia de Montevideo para la Implementación de la Agenda Regional de Género en el Marco del Desarrollo Sostenible hacia 2030 (LC/CRM. 13/5). CEPAL.
Cunial, S. (2018). Políticas públicas sobre cuestiones morales conflictivas: el caso de la despenalización del consumo de drogas en Argentina. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 47, 123-149.
Dolowitz, D. y Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance: an international journal of policy and administration, 13 (1), 5-24.
Englehart, N.A. y Miller, M.K. (2020). Women's Rights in International Law: Critical Actors, Structuration, and the Institutionalization of Norms. Politics & Gender, 16 (2), 363-387. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X19000242
Engle Merry, S. (2011). Gender justice and CEDAW: The convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. Hawwa, 9 (1-2), 49-75. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920811X575505
Facio, A. (2011). Viena 1993, cuando las mujeres nos hicimos humanas. Pensamiento Iberoamericano, 9, 3-20.
Fernós, M. (2010). National mechanism for gender equality and empowerment of women in Latin America and the Caribbean region. Serie Mujer y Desarrollo CEPAL, 102, 1-63.
Forstener, N. (2019). Feminismos en el Chile Post-Dictadura: Hegemonías y Marginalidades. Revista Punto Género, 11, 34-50.
Fríes, L. y Lacrampette, N. (2013). Feminismos, género y derecho. En Lacrampette, N. y Nash, C. (Eds.). Derechos Humanos y Mujeres: Teoría y Práctica (pp. 33-65). Centro de Derechos Humanos-Universidad de Chile.
García, B. (2016). Vencedores y vencidos: surgimiento y éxito de la coalición golpista antiperonista dentro de las Fuerzas Armadas (1946-1955). Postdata, 21 (1), 85-128.
Gauché, X. (2017). Planes de Acción Nacional sobre mujeres, paz y seguridad. Experiencias comparadas y proyecciones para el caso chileno. Revista de Derecho, 30 (2), 203-223.
Gray, M., Caul Kittilson, M., y Sandholtz, W. (2006). Women and globalization: A study of 180 countries, 1975-2000. International Organization, 60 (2), 293-333. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060176
Großklaus, M. (2015). Appropriation and the dualism of human rights: understanding the contradictory impact of gender norms in Nigeria. Third World Quarterly, 36 (6), 1253-1267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1047206
Guzmán, V. (2002). Las relaciones de género en un mundo global. Serie Mujer y Desarrollo CEPAL, 38, 1-33.
Guzmán, V. (2011). Procesos políticos-institucionales e igualdad de género, Chile 1980-2010 (Tesis doctoral), Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/tesis/2011/hdl_10803_83982/vgb1de1.pdf
Guzmán, V. y Montaño, S. (2012). Políticas públicas e institucionalidad de género en América Latina (1985-2010). Serie Mujer y Desarrollo CEPAL, 118, 1-39.
Haas, P. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization, 46 (1), 1-35.
Kirkwood, J. (1981). Chile: la mujer en la formulación política. Documento de Trabajo FLACSO, 109, 1-16.
Lamus, D. (2008). La agenda global de las Naciones Unidas para ‘La Mujer’. Revista Polis, 20 (7), 261-283.
Leonidas, J. (2017). Mecanismos causales y process tracing. Una introducción. Revista SAAP, 11 (1), 145-175.
Ley número 19.023, que crea el Servicio Nacional de la Mujer. Diario Oficial del 3 de enero de 1991.
Ley número 20.820, que crea el Ministerio de la Mujer y la Equidad de Género, y modifica normas legales que indica. Diario Oficial del 20 de marzo de 2015.
Lombardo, E. (2003). El mainstreaming de género en la Unión Europea. Aequalitas. Revista Jurídica de Igualdad de Oportunidades entre Mujeres y Hombres, 10-15, 6-11.
Magallón, C. (2007). Mujer, paz y seguridad: un balance de la Resolución 1325. Seminario de Investigación para la Paz, 63-77.
Martin, S. (2016). Una mirada, distintas propuestas: género y políticas públicas. Investigaciones feministas, 1 (7), 289-311.
Martínez, E. (2018). Atlas de las luchas de las mujeres: 90 años de la Comisión Interamericana de Mujeres, un camino de luchas, logros y desafíos. OEA.
Mejía, L. (2012). La Comisión Interamericana de Mujeres y la Convención Belém do Pará. Impacto en el sistema interamericano de derechos humanos. Revista IIDH, 56, 189-213.
Meseguer, C. y Gilardi, F. (2008). Reflexiones sobre el debate de la difusión de políticas. Política y gobierno 15 (2), 315-351.
Molina, C. (2016). Potencialidades del trazado de procesos como herramienta para analizar políticas de salud. Trabajo presentado en las I Jornadas Nacionales de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales de la UN Cuyo, 1-13.
Organización de las Naciones Unidas (2015). Transformar nuestro mundo: la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible. Resolución aprobada por la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas, A/RES/70/1 (25 de septiembre de 2015). En https://unctad.org/meetings/es/SessionalDocuments/ares70d1_es.pdf
Olea, R., Grau, O. y Pérez, F. (2000). El género en apuros. Santiago de Chile: LOM editorial.
Osorio, C. (2014). La difusión de programas de transferencia condicionada en América Latina 1990-2010 (Tesis Doctoral). Universidad Pompeu Fabra. https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/286738/tcog.pdf;jsessionid=4C4B704AB4C2943029D7E11CF838A265?sequence=1
Osorio, C. (2015). Mecanismos de difusión de los Programas de Transferencia Condicionada en América Latina. El caso chileno. Íconos, Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 53, 31-48.
Osorio, C. y Vergara, J.M. (2016). La difusión de políticas públicas. Estado del arte y contribuciones para la disciplina en América Latina. Revista de Ciencia Política, 54 (2), 235-254.
Pérez, D. (28.02.2022). Proceso constituyente chileno ¿Acaso la primera constitución feminista del mundo? Recuperado de: https://www.globallens.mx/post/proceso-constituyente-chileno-acaso-la-primera-constituci%C3%B3n-feminista-del-mundo
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (2010). Desarrollo Humano en Chile. Género: los desafíos para la igualdad. PNUD.
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (2017). Desiguales. Orígenes, cambios y desafíos de la brecha social en Chile. PNUD
Reverter, S. (2011). Los retos del feminismo institucional. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 4, 223-229.
Rico, N. (1996). Violencia de género, un problema de derechos humanos. Serie Mujer y Desarrollo, 16. CEPAL.
Ríos, M., Godoy, L. y Guerrero, E. (2003). ¿Un nuevo silencio feminista? La transformación de un movimiento social en el Chile postdictadura. CEM/Ed. Cuarto Propio.
Roth, A. (2002). Políticas públicas: formulación, implementación y evaluación. Ediciones Aurora
Ruiz, P. (2015). La transferencia de políticas globales en género y su puesta en agenda. Revista Ópera, 16, 55-75.
Senado (1995). Discusión y exposición ante el Senado por el Proyecto de Acuerdo de la Conferencia Mundial de la Mujer: Igualdad, Desarrollo y Paz. Recuperado de: https://www.senado.cl/appsenado/index.php?mo=sesionessala&ac=getDocumento&teseid=22621&nrobol=s21712_P&tema=Proyecto&legiid=&parl_ini=60&tagid=43
Troncoso, C. (18.10.2020). Entrevista a Adriana Delpiano, ministra directora del Servicio Nacional de la Mujer 2000-2003.
Troncoso, C. (05.11.2020). Entrevista a Andrea Reyes, funcionaria del Servicio Nacional de la Mujer (1991-2015) y Ministerio de la Mujer y Equidad de Género (2015-2020).
Troncoso, C. (04.11.2020). Entrevista a Carolina Carrera, integrante Corporación Humanas (2004 a la actualidad).
Troncoso, C. (16.10.2020). Entrevista a Josefina Bilbao, ministra directora del Servicio Nacional de la Mujer (1994-2000).
Troncoso, C. (21.10.2020). Entrevista a Maricel Saturel, funcionaria del Servicio Nacional de la Mujer (relaciones internacionales) (2006-2010) y asesora de ONU Mujeres (2018 a la actualidad).
Troncoso, C. (16.12.2020). Entrevista a María Teresa Rodríguez, jefa del departamento de relaciones internacionales del Servicio Nacional de la Mujer (1995-2001).
Troncoso, C. (23.10.2020). Entrevista a Nicole Bidegain, asesora División de Asuntos de Género de la CEPAL (2016 a la actualidad).
Troncoso, C. (30.11.2020). Entrevista a Pamela Villalobos, asesora Departamento de Relaciones Internacionales (1999-2002) y asesora de Género Ministerio de Defensa (2004-2010).
Troncoso, C. (20.10.2020). Entrevista a Patricia Rojas, funcionaria del Servicio Nacional de la Mujer (1991-2015) y Ministerio de la Mujer y Equidad de Género (2015-2020).
Troncoso, C. (16.10.2020). Entrevista a Verónica Matus, integrante de Corporación La Morada (1994 a la actualidad).
Troncoso, C. (22.10.2020). Entrevista a Virginia Guzmán, integrante Centro de la Mujer (1984 a la actualidad).
Zwingel, S. (2012). How Do Norms Travel? Theorizing International Women's Rights in Transnational Perspective. International Studies Quarterly, 56 (1), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00701.x