Núm. 31 (2022)
Artículos

Ideología, polarización afectiva y análisis del discurso

Publicado diciembre 19, 2022

Palabras clave:

polarización afectiva, polarización política, desacuerdos cruzados, detección temprana, intervención
Cómo citar
Villanueva Fernández, N. V. F., & Almagro Holgado, M. . (2022). Ideología, polarización afectiva y análisis del discurso. Bajo Palabra, (31), 173–204. https://doi.org/10.15366/bp2022.31.008

Resumen

El proposito de este trabajo es explorar
una tension y un deseo. La tension es la que
encontramos entre nuestra capacidad para
cambiar de opinion, componente crucial casi
de cualquier interpretacion del progreso, y la
tendencia que parecemos exhibir a atrincherarnos
en las creencias que estan en el centro
de la identidad politica con la que nos
identificamos en un contexto determinado.
Nos gustaria ser capaces de detectar y jubilar
nuestros prejuicios, de avanzar hacia posiciones
mas inclusivas y que nos hicieran mejores
ciudadanos. Y, sin embargo, nos vemos arrastrados,
en ocasiones contra nuestro mejor
juicio, hacia posiciones que heredamos de las
personas con las que compartimos las cosas
que nos importan. A lo largo de este trabajo
nos preguntaremos como es posible intervenir
sobre esta tension para retener aspectos
necesarios de ambas tendencias. En concreto,
pensaremos como es posible intervenir en
este aparente problema cumpliendo un deseo:
queremos combatir el mal discurso con
mas discurso. Las estrategias de intervencion
destinadas a contrarrestar los efectos negativos
de la polarizacion que desarrollaremos
tendrán como objetivo mejorar la calidad de
la deliberacion democratica. El dialogo con
aquellas personas con quienes estamos en
desacuerdo nos parece un ideal democra?tico
irrenunciable. No hay, en este sentido, progreso
sin desacuerdo.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

dB, “Estudio sobre la degradación y el desgaste político”, consultado en https://

db.es/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Estudio-sobre-el-desgaste-pol%-

C3%ADtico-El-Pa%C3%ADs.pdf (consultado: 04/11/2021).

Abeywickrama, R. S. & Laham, S. M., “Meta-cognition predicts attitude depolarization

and intentions to engage with the opposition following pro-attitudinal

advocacy”, Social Psychology, 51(6), 2020, 408–421. https://doi.

org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000424

Adler, D. R., “The centrist paradox: Political correlates of the democratic disconnect”,

SSRN, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3214467

Almagro, M., “La polarización política: polarización expresiva o en actitudes”,

Revista de la SLMFCE. Nº Extraordinario Congreso de Posgrado 2019, 2019, 41-

Almagro, M. & Fernández-Castro, V., “The Social Cover View: a non-epistemic

approach to mindreading”, Philosophia, 48, 2020, 483–505. https://doi.

org/10.1007/s11406-019-00096-2

Almagro, M., Hannikainen, I. R. & Villanueva, N., “Whose Words Hurt? Contextual

Determinants of Offensive Speech”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,

https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211026128

Almagro, M., Osorio, M. & Villanueva, N., “Weaponized Testimonial Injustice”,

Las Torres de Lucca, 10(29), 2021, 29-42. https://doi.org/10.5209/ltdl.76461

Almagro, M. & Villanueva, N., “Polarización y tecnologías de la información:

radicales vs. extremistas”, Dilemata, Revista Internacional de Éticas Aplicadas, 34,

, 51-69.

Almagro, M. & Villanueva, N., “Exactly, what do you mean?”, Daimon, Revista

Internacional de Filosofía, 84, 2021, 97-113. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.

Almagro, M. & Villanueva, N., “Qué decir y qué esperar cuando hablamos de la

pandemia”, Revista de la Sociedad de Lógica, Metodología y Filosofía de la Ciencia

en España, Número especial: Filosofía en tiempos de pandemia, 2021c, 64-71.

Almagro, M., Bordonaba, D., Osorio, J. & Villanueva, N., “Crossed disagreements

and Polarization”, manuscrito.

Almagro, M. & Villanueva, N., “Can we get polarized over what we don’t understand?”,

manuscrito.

— 199

APSA, “Part I. the need for greater party responsibility”, The American Political

Science Review, 44(3), 1950, 15–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1950999

Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, F.,

Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A., “Exposure to opposing views

on social media can increase political polarization”, Proceedings of the National

Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(37) 2018. https://doi.

org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115

Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., Bonneau, R., “Tweeting

from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo

chamber?”, Psychological Science, 26(10), 2015, 1531–1542. https://doi.

org/10.1177/0956797615594620

Bordonaba, D., “Polarización como Impermeabilidad: Cuando las Razones Ajenas

no Importan”, Cinta de Moebio, 66, 2019, 295-309.

Bordonaba, D., “Los peligros de las cámaras de eco”, Endoxa, 45, 2020, 249–

Bordonaba, D. & Villanueva, N., “Affective polarization as impervious reasoning”,

en Philosophical Perspectives. The 13th conference of the Italian Society for

Analytic Philosophy: Italian Society for Analytic Philosophy, 2018.

Bordonaba, D. & Villanueva, N., “Crossed Disagreements: A Quantitative and

Qualitative Study on the Minutes of the Sessions of the Spanish Parliament”,

Actas del IX Congreso de la Sociedad de Lógica, Metodología y Filosofía de la Ciencia

en España, 2018, 101- 108.

Bordonaba, D. & Villanueva, N., “Retractación y Contextualismo: Nuevas

Condiciones de Adecuación”, en D. Pérez (ed.), Cuestiones de la filosofía del lenguaje,

Zaragoza, Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza, 2022, 233-259.

Bordonaba, D., Fernández-Castro, V. & Torices, J. R., The Political Turn in

Analytic Philosophy. Reflections on Social Injustice and Oppression, Berlin, De

Gruyter, 2022.

Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M., “Cross-country trends in affective

polarization”, Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01160

Bramson, A., Grim, P., Singer, D. J., Berger, W. J., Sack, G., Fisher, S., Flocken,

C., & Holman, B., “Understanding polarization: meanings, measures, and

model evaluation”, Philosophy of science, 84(1), 2017, 115–159. https://doi.

org/10.1086/688938

Brown, R., Social Psychology: The Second Edition, New York, The Free Press.

Carothers, T. & O’Donohue, A., Democracies divided: The global challenge of

political polarization, Portland (OR), Brookings Institution Press, 2019.

Cassam, Q., Vices of the Mind: From the Intellectual to the Political, Oxford,

Oxford University Press, 2019.

CEMOP, “Encuesta nacional de polarización política”, consultado en https://

www.cemopmurcia.es/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/CUESTIONARIO-ENCUESTA-

NACIONAL-DE-POLARIZACION.pdf (consultado: 04/11/2021)

Chen, H., Reardon, R., Rea, C., & Moore, D. J., “Forewarning of content

and involvement: Consequences for persuasion and resistance to persuasion”,

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 1992, 523–541. https://doi.org/

1016/0022-1031(92)90044-K

Davies, A., “Identity display: another motive for metalinguistic disagreement”,

Inquiry, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1712229

De Cruz, H. & De Smedt, J., “The value of epistemic disagreement in scientific

practice. the case of homo floresiensis”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

Part A, 44(2), 2013, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.02.002

Dorst, K., “Rational Polarization”, SSRN, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/

ssrn.3918498

Fiorina, M. P., Unstable Majorities: Polarization, Party Sorting, and Political Stalemate,

Washington DC, Hoover Press, 2017.

Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W., American Affective Polarization in Comparative

Perspective, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Hetherington, M. J., “Putting polarization in perspective”, British Journal of

Political Science, 39(2), 2009, 413–448. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27742750

Hetherington, M. J. & Rudolph, T. J., Why Washington won’t work: Polarization,

political trust, and the governing crisis, Chicago, University of Chicago Press,

Hetherington, M. J. & Weiler, J. D., Authoritarianism and polarization in American

politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009.

ICIP, “Encuesta sobre polarización y convivencia en Cataluña 2020”, consultado

en https://www.icip.cat/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/informes_2020-17_

cas_compressed.pdf (consultado: 04/11/2021)

— 201

Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J., “The

origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States”, Annual

Review of Political Science, 22, 2019, 129–146.

Kahan, D. M., “The expressive rationality of inaccurate perceptions”, Behavioral

and Brain Sciences, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x15002332

Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D., “Cultural cognition of scientific

consensus”, Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 2011, 147–174. https://doi.org

/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246

Kelly, T., “Disagreement, dogmatism, and belief polarization”, The Journal of

Philosophy, 105 (10), 2008, 611–633. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20620131

Klinenberg, E., Palaces for the People. How Social Infrastructure can help fight

Inequality, Polarization, and the decline of Civil Rights, New York, Crown, 2018.

Kunda, Z., “The Case for Motivated Reasoning”, Psychological Bulletin, 108(3),

, 480-498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480

Legrain, P., Them and Us: How Immigrants and Locals Can Thrive Together, London,

Oneworld Publications, 2020.

Levitsky, S. & Ziblatt, D., How democracies die. Portland (OR), Broadway

Books, 2018.

Levendusky, M. S., “When efforts to depolarize the electorate fail”, Public Opinion

Quarterly, 83(3), 2018, 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy036

Lord, Charles G., Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., “Biased Assimilation and Attitude

Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence”,

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 1979, 2098-2109. https://

doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098

Mason, L., Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity, Chicago, University

of Chicago Press, 2018.

Miller, A. G., McHoskey, J. W., Bane, C. M., & Dowd, T. G., “The attitude

polarization phenomenon: Role of response measure, attitude extremity, and

behavioral consequences of reported attitude change”, Journal of Personality

and Social Psychology, 64(4), 1993, 561–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-

64.4.561

Munro, G. D. & Ditto, P. H., “Biased assimilation, attitude polarization,

and affect in reactions to stereotype-relevant scientific information”, Personality

and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(6), 1997, 636–653. https://doi.

org/10.1177/0146167297236007

Napier, J.L. y Luguri, J.B., From Silos to Synergies. The Effects of Construal Level

on Political Polarization, London, Routledge, 2016.

Navajas, J., Heduan, F. A., Garrido, J. M., González, P. A., Garbulsky, G., Ariely,

D., & Sigman, M., “Reaching consensus in polarized moral debates”, Current

Biology, 29, 2019, 4124–4129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.10.018

Osorio, J., & Villanueva, N., “Expressivism and Crossed Disagreements”, Royal

Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 86, 2019, 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1017/

S1358246119000092

Pérez-Navarro, E. & Villanueva, N. “Expresivismo contemporáneo: nuevos retos

y nuevas soluciones”, en I. Vicario (ed.), Filosofía del Lenguaje, Madrid, Tecnos,

en prensa.

Pinedo, M., “Ecological psychology and enactivism: A normative way out from

ontological dilemmas”, Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2020, 1–10. https://doi.

org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01637

Pinedo, M. & Villanueva, N., “Epistemic de-platforming”, en D. Bordonaba,

V. Fernández, & J. R. Torices (Eds.), The Political Turn in Analytic Philosophy.

Reflections on Social Injustice and Oppression, Berlin, De Gruyter, 2022.

Porter, E., Wood, T. J., & Bahador, B., “Can presidential misinformation on

climate change be corrected? evidence from internet and phone experiments”

Research and Politics, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019864784

Schkade, D., Sunstein, C. S., & Hastie, R., “What Happened on Deliberation

Day?”, California Law Review, 95(3), 2007, 915-940. https://www.jstor.org/stable/

Singer, D.J., Bramson, A., Grim, P. et al., “Rational social and political

polarization”, Philosophical Studies, 176, 2019, 2243–2267.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1124-5

Sunstein, C. R., “The law of group polarization”, The Journal of Political Philosophy,

(2), 2002, 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00148

Sunstein, C. R., Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide, Oxford,

Oxford University Press, 2009.

Sunstein, C. R., Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media, Princeton,

Princeton University Press, 2017.

Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C., “Social Categorization

and Intergroup Behaviour”, European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 1971,

–78.

— 203

Talisse, R. B., Overdoing democracy: Why we must put politics in its place, Oxford,

Oxford University Press, 2019.

Torices, J. R., “Understanding dogwhistles politics”, Theoria. An International

Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 2021. https://doi.

org/10.1387/theo- ria.22510

Unkelbach, C., Koch, A., Silva, R. R., & Garcia-Marques, T., “Truth by repetition:

Explanations and implications”, Current Directions in Psychological

Science, 28(3), 2019, 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419827854

Vicario, M. D., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley,

H. E., Quattrociocchi, W., “The spreading of misinformation online”, Proceedings

of the National Academy of Sciences, 113 (3), 2016, 554– 559. https://

doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517441113

Villanueva, N., “Expresivismo y semántica”, en D. Pérez Chico (Ed.), Cuestiones

de la filosofía del lenguaje, Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza, 2018, 437-470.

Villanueva, N., “Wittgenstein: descripciones y estados mentales”, en J. J. Acero

(Ed.), Guía Comares de Wittgenstein, Comares, 2019, 145–170.

Williams, D., “Signalling, commitment, and strategic absurdities”, Mind &

Language, 2021, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12392

Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations. [IF]. Edición de Rhees, R. y Anscombe,

G. E. M.. Traducido al inglés por Anscombe, G. E. M. Edición revisada.

Oxford, Blackwell, 1956/1998.