Desplazamiento del Estado de Naturaleza: Un desacuerdo con Graeber y Wengrow
Palabras clave:
David Graeber, David Wengrow, Shirley Strum, Bruno Latour, Peer Schouten, Estado de naturalezaDerechos de autor 2023 Graham Harman
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Resumen
El amanecer de todo, de David Graeber y David Wengrow, ofrece un saludable correctivo a la teoría política moderna, con su elección entre dos formas del “estado de naturaleza”: La visión negativa de Hobbes de seres humanos sedientos de sangre mantenidos a raya sólo por el poder violento del soberano, y la visión aparentemente más positiva de Rousseau de seres humanos naturalmente iguales corrompidos por la introducción de la agricultura y la metalurgia. Sin embargo, la alternativa que ofrecen -un mundo de humanos imaginativos y experimentales que eligen libremente diferentes formas de sociedad- resta excesiva importancia al papel político mediador de las cosas no humanas. Este movimiento, a su vez, depende excesivamente de una ontología modernista que opone el pensamiento humano libre a las cosas mecánicamente deterministas. Basándose en las ideas de la teoría del actor-red, este artículo defiende el papel central de los objetos inanimados en la esfera política
Descargas
Citas
Bateson, Gregory. “Cultural Contact and Schismogenesis,” Man 35, pp. 178-183.
Beaumont, Matthew. “Imagining the End Times: Ideology, the Contemporary Disaster Movie, Contagion,” in M. Flisfeder & L.P. Willis, L.P., eds., Žižek and Media Studies, pp. 79-89. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC : Duke University Press, 2010.
Boehm, Christopher. Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behaviour. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Clastres, Pierre. Society Against the State: Essays in Political Anthropology. New York: Zone, 1987.
Fisher, Mark. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Winchester, UK: Zero Books, 2009.
Franklin, H. Bruce. “What Are we to Make of Jean Baudrillard’s Apocalypse?”, Adventure Thru Inner Space: Essays and Articles, 1979. <https://www.jgballard.ca/criticism/ballard_apocalypse_1979.html>.
Girard, René. Violence and the Sacred, trans. P. Gregory. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.
Graeber, David. “Culture as Creative Refusal,” The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 31.2 (Autumn 2013), pp. 1-19.
Graeber, David & David Wengrow. The Dawn of Everything : A New History of Humanity. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux, 2021.
Hallward, Peter. “The Will of the People: Notes Towards a Dialectical Voluntarism,” Radical Philosophy 155 (May/June 2009), pp. 17-29.
Harari, Yuval. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. London: Harville Secker, 2014.
Harman, Graham. Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political. London: Pluto, 2014.
Harman, Graham. Dante’s Broken Hammer: The Ethics, Aesthetics, and Metaphysics of Love. London: Repeater, 2016.
Harman, Graham, “Malabou’s Political Critique of Speculative Realism,” Open
Philosophy 4.1 (2021), pp. 94-105.
Harman, Graham. “The Only Exit From Modern Philosophy,” Open Philosophy 3 (2020), pp. 132-146
Harman, Graham & Christopher Witmore, Objects Untimely: Conversations Between Archaeology and Object-Oriented Ontology. Cambridge, UK: Polity, forthcoming 2023.
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Huizinga, Johan. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture, trans. R.F.C. Hull. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1949.
Jameson, Fredric. The Seeds of Time. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
Latour, Bruno. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern, trans. C. Porter. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.)
Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Prince, Second Edition, trans. R. Adams. New York: Norton, 1992.
Malabou, Catherine. “Le vide politique du réalisme contemporain,” in L’écho du réel, C. Crignon, W. Laforge, & P. Nadrigny, eds., pp. 485-498. Sesto San Giovanni, Italy: Mimesis, 2021.
Marres, Noortje. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
Marx, Karl & Friedrich Engels. The Marx-Engels Reader, ed. R. Tucker. New York: Norton, 1978.
McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.
Mitchell, Timothy. Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. London: Verso, 2013.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, trans. D. Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. Being and Nothingness, trans. S. Richmond. New York: Washington Square Press, 2021.
Schmitt, Carl. The Concept of the Political, trans. G. Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Schouten, Peer. “The Materiality of State Failure: Social Contract Theory, Infrastructure and Governmental Power in Congo,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41.3 (June 2013), pp. 553-574.
Strum, S.S. & Bruno Latour. “Redefining the Social Link: From Baboons to Humans,” Social Science Information, 26.4 (1987), pp. 783-802.
Williams, Raymond. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. London: Routledge, 2004.
Wissler, Clark. The American Indian. (New York: Douglas C. McMurtrie, 1922.)
Young, Niki. “Only Two Peas in a Pod: On the Overcoming of Ontological Taxonomies,” Symposia Melitensia 17 (2021), pp. 27-36.