Desplazamiento del Estado de Naturaleza: Un desacuerdo con Graeber y Wengrow
Palabras clave:
David Graeber, David Wengrow, Shirley Strum, Bruno Latour, Peer Schouten, Estado de naturalezaDerechos de autor 2023 Graham Harman
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Resumen
El amanecer de todo, de David Graeber y David Wengrow, ofrece un saludable correctivo a la teoría política moderna, con su elección entre dos formas del “estado de naturaleza”: La visión negativa de Hobbes de seres humanos sedientos de sangre mantenidos a raya sólo por el poder violento del soberano, y la visión aparentemente más positiva de Rousseau de seres humanos naturalmente iguales corrompidos por la introducción de la agricultura y la metalurgia. Sin embargo, la alternativa que ofrecen -un mundo de humanos imaginativos y experimentales que eligen libremente diferentes formas de sociedad- resta excesiva importancia al papel político mediador de las cosas no humanas. Este movimiento, a su vez, depende excesivamente de una ontología modernista que opone el pensamiento humano libre a las cosas mecánicamente deterministas. Basándose en las ideas de la teoría del actor-red, este artículo defiende el papel central de los objetos inanimados en la esfera política
Descargas
Citas
Bateson, Gregory. “Cultural Contact and Schismogenesis,” Man 35, pp. 178-183.
Beaumont, Matthew. “Imagining the End Times: Ideology, the Contemporary Disaster Movie, Contagion,” in M. Flisfeder & L.P. Willis, L.P., eds., Žižek and Media Studies, pp. 79-89. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC : Duke University Press, 2010.
Boehm, Christopher. Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behaviour. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Clastres, Pierre. Society Against the State: Essays in Political Anthropology. New York: Zone, 1987.
Fisher, Mark. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Winchester, UK: Zero Books, 2009.
Franklin, H. Bruce. “What Are we to Make of Jean Baudrillard’s Apocalypse?”, Adventure Thru Inner Space: Essays and Articles, 1979. <https://www.jgballard.ca/criticism/ballard_apocalypse_1979.html>.
Girard, René. Violence and the Sacred, trans. P. Gregory. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.
Graeber, David. “Culture as Creative Refusal,” The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 31.2 (Autumn 2013), pp. 1-19.
Graeber, David & David Wengrow. The Dawn of Everything : A New History of Humanity. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux, 2021.
Hallward, Peter. “The Will of the People: Notes Towards a Dialectical Voluntarism,” Radical Philosophy 155 (May/June 2009), pp. 17-29.
Harari, Yuval. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. London: Harville Secker, 2014.
Harman, Graham. Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political. London: Pluto, 2014.
Harman, Graham. Dante’s Broken Hammer: The Ethics, Aesthetics, and Metaphysics of Love. London: Repeater, 2016.
Harman, Graham, “Malabou’s Political Critique of Speculative Realism,” Open
Philosophy 4.1 (2021), pp. 94-105.
Harman, Graham. “The Only Exit From Modern Philosophy,” Open Philosophy 3 (2020), pp. 132-146
Harman, Graham & Christopher Witmore, Objects Untimely: Conversations Between Archaeology and Object-Oriented Ontology. Cambridge, UK: Polity, forthcoming 2023.
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Huizinga, Johan. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture, trans. R.F.C. Hull. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1949.
Jameson, Fredric. The Seeds of Time. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
Latour, Bruno. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern, trans. C. Porter. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.)
Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Prince, Second Edition, trans. R. Adams. New York: Norton, 1992.
Malabou, Catherine. “Le vide politique du réalisme contemporain,” in L’écho du réel, C. Crignon, W. Laforge, & P. Nadrigny, eds., pp. 485-498. Sesto San Giovanni, Italy: Mimesis, 2021.
Marres, Noortje. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
Marx, Karl & Friedrich Engels. The Marx-Engels Reader, ed. R. Tucker. New York: Norton, 1978.
McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.
Mitchell, Timothy. Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. London: Verso, 2013.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, trans. D. Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. Being and Nothingness, trans. S. Richmond. New York: Washington Square Press, 2021.
Schmitt, Carl. The Concept of the Political, trans. G. Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Schouten, Peer. “The Materiality of State Failure: Social Contract Theory, Infrastructure and Governmental Power in Congo,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41.3 (June 2013), pp. 553-574.
Strum, S.S. & Bruno Latour. “Redefining the Social Link: From Baboons to Humans,” Social Science Information, 26.4 (1987), pp. 783-802.
Williams, Raymond. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. London: Routledge, 2004.
Wissler, Clark. The American Indian. (New York: Douglas C. McMurtrie, 1922.)
Young, Niki. “Only Two Peas in a Pod: On the Overcoming of Ontological Taxonomies,” Symposia Melitensia 17 (2021), pp. 27-36.