No. 32 (2023): ¿Por qué la filosofía es importante para la política? ¿Por qué es importante la política en la filosofía?
Artículos

Displacing the State of Nature: A Disagreement with Graeber and Wengrow

Graham Harman
Southern California Institute of Architecture
Publié-e juin 6, 2023

Mots-clés :

David Graeber, David Wengrow, Shirley Strum, Bruno Latour, Peer Schouten, State of Nature
Comment citer
Harman, G. (2023). Displacing the State of Nature: A Disagreement with Graeber and Wengrow. Bajo Palabra, (32), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.15366/bp2023.32.006 (Original work published 5 juin 2023)

Résumé

David Graeber and David Wengrow’s The Dawn of Everything offers a salutary corrective to modern political theory, with its choice between two forms of the “state of nature”: Hobbes’s negative vision of bloodthirsty humans held in check only by the violent power of the sovereign, and Rousseau’s apparently more positive vision of naturally equal humans corrupted by the introduction of agriculture and metallurgy. However, the alternative Graeber and Wengrow offer –a world of imaginative and experimental humans freely choosing different forms of society– excessively downplays the political mediating role of non-human things. This move, in turn, is overly dependent on a modernist ontology that opposes free human thought to mechanically deterministic things. Drawing on the insights of Actor-Network Theory in particular, this article argues for the central role of inanimate objects in the political sphere

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Références

Bateson, Gregory. “Cultural Contact and Schismogenesis,” Man 35, pp. 178-183.

Beaumont, Matthew. “Imagining the End Times: Ideology, the Contemporary Disaster Movie, Contagion,” in M. Flisfeder & L.P. Willis, L.P., eds., Žižek and Media Studies, pp. 79-89. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC : Duke University Press, 2010.

Boehm, Christopher. Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behaviour. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.

Clastres, Pierre. Society Against the State: Essays in Political Anthropology. New York: Zone, 1987.

Fisher, Mark. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Winchester, UK: Zero Books, 2009.

Franklin, H. Bruce. “What Are we to Make of Jean Baudrillard’s Apocalypse?”, Adventure Thru Inner Space: Essays and Articles, 1979. <https://www.jgballard.ca/criticism/ballard_apocalypse_1979.html>.

Girard, René. Violence and the Sacred, trans. P. Gregory. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.

Graeber, David. “Culture as Creative Refusal,” The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 31.2 (Autumn 2013), pp. 1-19.

Graeber, David & David Wengrow. The Dawn of Everything : A New History of Humanity. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux, 2021.

Hallward, Peter. “The Will of the People: Notes Towards a Dialectical Voluntarism,” Radical Philosophy 155 (May/June 2009), pp. 17-29.

Harari, Yuval. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. London: Harville Secker, 2014.

Harman, Graham. Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political. London: Pluto, 2014.

Harman, Graham. Dante’s Broken Hammer: The Ethics, Aesthetics, and Metaphysics of Love. London: Repeater, 2016.

Harman, Graham, “Malabou’s Political Critique of Speculative Realism,” Open

Philosophy 4.1 (2021), pp. 94-105.

Harman, Graham. “The Only Exit From Modern Philosophy,” Open Philosophy 3 (2020), pp. 132-146

Harman, Graham & Christopher Witmore, Objects Untimely: Conversations Between Archaeology and Object-Oriented Ontology. Cambridge, UK: Polity, forthcoming 2023.

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Huizinga, Johan. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture, trans. R.F.C. Hull. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1949.

Jameson, Fredric. The Seeds of Time. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.

Latour, Bruno. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.

Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern, trans. C. Porter. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.)

Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Prince, Second Edition, trans. R. Adams. New York: Norton, 1992.

Malabou, Catherine. “Le vide politique du réalisme contemporain,” in L’écho du réel, C. Crignon, W. Laforge, & P. Nadrigny, eds., pp. 485-498. Sesto San Giovanni, Italy: Mimesis, 2021.

Marres, Noortje. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

Marx, Karl & Friedrich Engels. The Marx-Engels Reader, ed. R. Tucker. New York: Norton, 1978.

McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.

Mitchell, Timothy. Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. London: Verso, 2013.

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, trans. D. Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. Being and Nothingness, trans. S. Richmond. New York: Washington Square Press, 2021.

Schmitt, Carl. The Concept of the Political, trans. G. Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.

Schouten, Peer. “The Materiality of State Failure: Social Contract Theory, Infrastructure and Governmental Power in Congo,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41.3 (June 2013), pp. 553-574.

Strum, S.S. & Bruno Latour. “Redefining the Social Link: From Baboons to Humans,” Social Science Information, 26.4 (1987), pp. 783-802.

Williams, Raymond. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. London: Routledge, 2004.

Wissler, Clark. The American Indian. (New York: Douglas C. McMurtrie, 1922.)

Young, Niki. “Only Two Peas in a Pod: On the Overcoming of Ontological Taxonomies,” Symposia Melitensia 17 (2021), pp. 27-36.