No. 46 (2022)
Artículos

NUEVAS PERSPECTIVAS EN TORNO AL BREXIT: EL IMPACTO DE LAS PERCEPCIONES SOBRE LA SALUD EN EL VOTO PROBREXIT

Published October 10, 2022

Keywords:

Brexit, health perceptions, UK, false propaganda, referendum
How to Cite
TOWNSON AGUILAR , S. . (2022). NUEVAS PERSPECTIVAS EN TORNO AL BREXIT: EL IMPACTO DE LAS PERCEPCIONES SOBRE LA SALUD EN EL VOTO PROBREXIT. Revista Jurídica Universidad Autónoma De Madrid, (46). https://doi.org/10.15366/rjuam2021.46.001

Abstract

Brexit has been analysed from diff erent perspectives, but health perceptions have not
yet been fully tested. I focus on health because the pro-Leave campaign claimed that, should the
Brexit succeed, the United Kingdom would not have to pay 350 million pounds a week to the
European Union, and this money could be allocated to the National Health Service (NHS). As
half of the British public believed this statement to be true, my research question is: did health
perceptions play a role in the Brexit referendum? My hypothesis is that individuals with worse
health perceptions were more likely to vote Leave because they thought they would benefi t from
a better funded NHS. After conducting some statistical analysis, I have concluded that health
perceptions were a signifi cant factor in explaining the Brexit vote, even when controlling for
perceptions of immigration, which has been a central determinant in the Brexit vote.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALABRESE, E., BECKER, S. FETZER, T. y NOVY, D., «Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data combined», European journal of political economy, vol. 56. 2019, pp. 132-150.

ALAIMO, L. y SOLIVETTI, L., «Territorial determinants of the Brexit vote», Social indicators research, vol. 144, núm. 2, 2019, pp. 647-667.

BECKER, S., FETZER, T. y NOVY, D., «The fundamental factors behind the Brexit vote», Vox CEPR policy portal, 31 October 2016. Disponible en: <https://voxeu.org/article/fundamental-factors-behind-brexit-vote> [Consultado el 22/01/2021].

BECKER, S., FETZER, T. y NOVY, D., «Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis», Economic policy, vol. 32, núm. 92, 2017, pp. 601-650.

BERNARDI, L. y JOHNS, R., «Depression and attitudes to change in referendums: the case of Brexit», European journal of political research, vol. 60, núm. 2, 2020, pp. 339-358.

BOWLER, S., BRUNELL, T., DONOVAN, T. y GRONKE, P., «Election administration and perceptions of fair elections», Electoral studies, vol. 38, 2015, pp. 1-9.

CANTARELLA, M., FRACCAROLI, N. y VOLPE, R., «Does fake news affect voting behaviour?», CEIS research papers, núm. 493, DEMB, WP series, núm. 146, 2019, pp. 1-47.

CLARK, N., «Explaining low turnout in European elections: the role of issue salience and institutional perceptions in elections to the European parliament», Journal of European integration, vol. 36, núm. 4, 2014, pp. 339-356.

CLARKE, H. D., GOODWIN, M. y WHITELEY, P., «Why Britain voted for Brexit: an individual-level analysis of the 2016 referendum vote», Parliamentary affairs, vol. 70, núm. 3, 2017, pp. 439-464.

COLANTONE, I. y STANIG, P., «Global competition and Brexit», American political science review, vol. 112, núm. 2, 2018, pp. 201-218.

CURTICE, J., «Why leave won the UK’s EU referendum», Journal of common market studies, vol. 55, 2017, pp. 19-37.

DORLING, D., «Brexit: the decision of a divided country», British medical journal, vol. 354, 2016, i3697.

European Social Survey round 8, 2016. Disponible en: <https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org> [Consultado el 2/01/2021].

FETZER, T., «Did austerity cause Brexit?», American economic review, vol. 109, núm. 11, 2019, pp. 3849-86.

FIDRMUC, J., HULÉNYI, M. y TUNALI, C. B., «Money can't buy EU love: European funds and the Brexit referendum», CESifo, WP series, núm. 6107, 2016, pp. 2-14.

GOODWIN, M. y HEATH, O., «The 2016 referendum, Brexit and the left behind: an aggregate-level analysis of the result», The political quarterly, vol. 87, núm. 3, (2016), pp. 323-332.

GRAY, J., «How the NHS has changed since 2010, in numbers», The Huffington Post, 27 December 2019. Disponible en: https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/nhs-changes-numbers-2010s_uk_5dfcdd1fe4b05b08bab44aeb. [Consultado el 24/03/2021].

HOBOLT, S., «The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent», Journal of European public policy, vol. 23, núm. 9, 2016, pp. 1259-1277.

LEDUC, L., «Opinion change and voting behaviour in referendums», European journal of political research, vol. 41., núm. 6, 2002, pp. 711-732.

LIBERINI, F., OSWALD, A. J., PROTO, E. y REDOANO, M., «Was Brexit caused by the unhappy and the old?», IZA discussion papers, núm. 11059, Institute of labour economics (IZA), Bonn, 2017.

MANDERBACKA, K., ARFFMAN, M., SUND, R. y KARVONEN, S., «Multiple social disadvantage does it have an effect on amenable mortality: a brief report», International journal for equity in health, vol. 13, núm. 1, 2014, pp. 67.

MAYER, M., KENTER, R. y MORRIS, J.C., «Partisan politics or public-health need? An empirical analysis of state choice during initial implementation of the Affordable Care Act», Politics and the life sciences, vol. 34, núm. 2, 2015, pp. 44-51.

MENDELSOHN, M. y CUTLER, F., «The effect of referendums on democratic citizens: information, politicization, efficacy and tolerance», British journal of political science, vol. 30, núm. 4, 2000, pp. 685-698.

MONTANARI, I. y NELSON, K., «Health care determinants in comparative perspective: the role of partisan politics for health care provision», International journal of comparative sociology, vol. 54, núm. 5-6, 2013, pp. 445-466.

NADEAU, R., LEWIS-BECK, M.S. y BÉLANGER, É., «Economics and elections revisited», Comparative political studies, vol. 46, núm. 5, 2013, pp. 551-573.

OWEN, E. y WALTER, S., «Open economy politics and Brexit: insights, puzzles, and ways forward», Review of international political economy, vol. 24, núm. 2, 2017, pp. 179-202.

POWDTHAVEE, N., PLAGNOL, A.C., FRIJTERS, P. y CLARK, A.E., «Who got the Brexit blues? The effect of Brexit on subjective wellbeing in the UK», Economica, vol. 86, núm. 343, 2019, pp. 471-494.

REID, A., «Buses and Breaking Point: freedom of expression and the ‘Brexit’ campaign», Ethical theory and moral practice, vol. 22, núm. 3, 2019, pp. 623-637.

ROGERS, J., y TYSZLER, M., «Information and economic voting», Political science research and methods, vol. 6, núm. 4, 2018, pp. 753-770.

RUCKERT, A. y LABONTÉ, R., «Health inequities in the age of austerity: the need for social protection policies», Social science and medicine, vol. 187, 2017, pp. 306-311.

SARTORI, G., The theory of democracy revisited, Chatham (Chatham House Publishers), 1987.

SHAW, D., SMITH, C.M. y SCULLY, J., «Why did Brexit happen? Using causal mapping to analyse secondary, longitudinal data», European journal of operational research, vol. 263, núm. 3, 2017, pp. 1019-1032.

STONE, J., «British public still believe vote leave ‘£350million a week to EU’ myth from Brexit referendum», Independent, 28 October 2018. Disponible en: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/vote-leave-brexit-lies-eu-pay-money-remain-poll-boris-johnson-a8603646.html. [Consultado el 10/02/2021].

STUCKLER, D., REEVES, A. LOOPSTRA, R., KARANIKOLOS, M. y MCKEE, M., «Austerity and health: the impact in the UK and Europe», European journal of public health, vol. 27, núm. 4, 2017, pp. 18-21.