Organización y Estructura de las Buenas Tesis Doctorales en Educación
Palavras-chave:
Estudios de doctorado, Ciencias sociales, Escritura, Edición de textos, Educación
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Resumo
Esta investigación busca determinar la estructura y organización de las buenas tesis en Educación en España con el fin de proporcionar información clara, concreta y útil a quienes inician la elaboración de sus tesis doctorales. Para ello se analizan todas las tesis en modalidad de monografía que han obtenido el premio extraordinario entre los años 2018 y 2022 en la disciplina académica de Educación en las universidades públicas españolas y que estuvieran disponibles a texto completo en el momento de la recogida de datos. En total, se estudiaron en profundidad 71 tesis de 25 universidades. Entre otros resultados, se encontró que las tesis con premio extraordinario tienen una extensión promedio de 405,4 páginas, excluyendo anexos. La distribución interna es la siguiente: Introducción, con 12,0 páginas de promedio (3,0 % del total); Marco Teórico, con 108,9 (26,9 %); Métodos, con 49,1 páginas (12,1 %); Resultados, con 134,1 (33,1 %); Discusión y Conclusiones, con 33,2 (8,2 %); y, por último, Referencias, que ocupan 33,3 páginas (8,2 % del total), lo que supone un promedio de 394,7 referencias. Con todo ello se aporta una gran cantidad de datos para las personas que empiezan las tesis y para las que las dirigen, que puede contribuir ayudar a elaborar mejores trabajos de investigación.
Downloads
Referências
Ali, A. y Kohun, F. (2006). Dealing with isolation feelings in IS doctoral programs. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 1, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.28945/58
Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Free Press.
Birch, J. W. (1983). Guide to the successful thesis and dissertation: Conception to publication: a handbook for students and faculty. Marcel Dekker.
Bolker, J. (1998). Writing your dissertation in fifteen minutes a day: A guide to starting, revising, and finishing your doctoral thesis. Holt Paperbacks.
Brailsford, I. P. (2016, 29 de mayo). How many chapters and pages are there in a doctoral thesis? [Blog] DoctoralWriting. https://doctoralwriting.wordpress.com/2018/05/29/how-many-chapters-and-pages-are-there-in-a-doctoral-thesis/
Brailsford, I. P., Sowden, E. y Orioli Figueira, B. (2016). Are doctoral theses changing over time? [Póster]. Meeting of Quality in Postgraduate Research. Adelaide, Australia.
Brennan, N. M. (2019). 100 PhD rules of the game to successfully complete a doctoral dissertation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(1), 364-376. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2019-030
Carter, S., Guerin, C. y Aitchison, C. (2020). Doctoral writing. Practices, processes and pleasures. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1808-9
Carter, S., Kelly, F. y Brailsford, I. (2012). Structuring your research thesis. Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-00936-4
Castelló, M., Pardo, M., Sala-Bubaré, A. y Suñe-Soler, N. (2017). Why do students consider dropping out of doctoral degrees? Institutional and personal factors. Higher Education, 74, 1053-1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0106-9
Coe, K. y Scacco, J. M. (2017). Quantitative content analysis. En J. Matthes (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 346-356). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0045
Davis, G. B. y Parker, C. A. y Straub, D. W. (1997). Writing the doctoral dissertation: A systematic approach. Barron's Educational Series
De Miguel Díaz, M. (2010). Evaluación y mejora de los estudios de doctorado. Revista de Educación, 352, 569-581.
Duke, N. y Beck, S. (1999). Education should consider alternative formats for the dissertation. Educational Researcher, 28, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028003031
Dunleavy, P. (2003). Authoring a PhD: How to plan, draft, write and finish a doctoral thesis or dissertation. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Eco, U. (2001). Como se hace una tesis. técnicas y procedimientos de estudio, investigación y escritura. Gedisa.
Evans, D., Gruba, P. y Zobel, J. (2011). How to write a better thesis. Melbourne Univ. Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04286-2
Franzosi, R. P. (2024). Content analysis. En M. Hardy y A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 447-565). Sage.
Gardner, S. (2008). Fitting the mold of graduate school: A qualitative study of socialization in doctoral education. Innovative Higher Education, 33, 125-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9068-x
Gill, P. y Burnard, P. (2008). The student-supervisor relationship in the PhD/Doctoral process. British Journal of Nursing, 17(10), 668-671. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.10.29484
González-Ocampo, G. y Castelló, M. (2019). How do doctoral students experience supervision?. Studies in Continuing Education, 41(3), 293-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1520208
Jegede, F. (2021). Doing a PhD in the social sciences: A student’s guide to post-graduate research and writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003055761
Kember, D. y Corbett, M. (2016). Structuring the thesis. Springer.
Krueger, C. H. (2018). Quantitative content analysis of Virginia doctoral dissertations 2007-2017: Trends in degree types and methodologies. Liberty University.
Lewis, C. W., Ginsberg, R., Davies, T. y Smith, K. (2004). The experiences of African American Ph.D. students at a predominantly white Carnegie I-research institution. College Student Journal, 38(2), 231-245.
Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Rowman & Littlefield.
Madsen, D. (1992). Successful dissertations and theses: A guide to graduate student research from proposal to completion. Jossey-Bass.
Mauch, J. E. y Birch, J. W. (1998). Guide to the successful thesis and dissertation. Conception to publication. A handbook for students and faculty. Marcel Dekker Inc.
Moradiellos, E. (2017). La tesis doctoral en ciencias humanas y sociales: Una guía práctica. Ediciones Akal.
Murillo, F. J., Martínez-Garrido, C. y Belavi, G. (2017). Sugerencias para escribir un buen artículo científico en educación. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 15(3), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2017.15.3.001
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Sage.
Paltridge, B. (2002). Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 21(2), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00025-9
Parker-Jenkins, M. (2018). Mind the gap: Developing the roles, expectations and boundaries in the doctoral supervisor-supervisee relationship. Studies in Higher Education, 43(1), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1153622
Phillips, E. y Pugh, D. (2010). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors. McGraw-Hill Education.
Pyrczak, F. (2021). Completing your thesis or dissertation: Professors share their techniques & strategies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315266718
Randolph, J. J., Gaiek, L. S., White, T. A., Slappey, L. A., Chastain, A., Prejean-Harris, R. y Hansard, C. (2012). A quantitative content analysis of Mercer University theses. Georgia Educational Researcher, 9(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.20429/ger.2012.090106
Randolph, J., DeWeese, S., Manuel, A. K., Baugher, G., Tessmer, K., Westbrook, A., Shoats, S., Balloun, J. y Crawford, L. (2014). Page length and methodological characteristics of recently published doctoral dissertations in education. Georgia Educational Researcher, 11(2), 46-68. https://doi.org/10.20429/ger.2014.110202
Rigby, J. y Jones, B. (2020). Bringing the doctoral thesis by published papers to the social sciences and the humanities: A quantitative easing? A small study of doctoral thesis submission rules and practice in two disciplines in the UK. Scientometrics, 124, 1387-1409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03483-9
Rourke, L. y Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504769
Satinsky, E. N., Kimura, T., Kiang, M. V., Abebe, R., Cunningham, S., Lee, H. y Tsai, A. C. (2021). Systematic review and meta-analysis of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation among Ph. D. students. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 14370. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93687-7
Schmidt, M. y Hansson, E. (2018). Doctoral students’ well-being: A literature review. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 13(1), 1508171. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1508171
Single, P. B. y Reis, R. M. (2023). Demystifying dissertation writing: A streamlined process from choice of topic to final text. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003444053
Sternberg, D. (2014). How to complete and survive a doctoral dissertation. St. Martin’s Griffin.
Sverdlik, A., Hall, N. C., McAlpine, L. y Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students’ completion, achievement, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361-388. https://doi.org/10.28945/4113
Williams, K. y Reid, M. (2023). Planning your dissertation. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Zhang, F., Litson, K. y Feldon, D. F. (2022). Social predictors of doctoral student mental health and well-being. PLoS ONE, 17(9), e0274273. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274273