LAS ALIANZAS PÚBLICO-PRIVADAS EN EDUCACIÓN: DEBATES, MODELOS Y HORIZONTES REGULATIVOS EN LOS PAÍSES DE LA OCDE
Palabras clave:
Alianzas Público Privadas, mercados educativos, regulación, desigualdades educativasResumen
Pese a la creciente popularidad de las Alianzas Público-Privadas (APP) en el sector educativo, existe un amplio consenso académico sobre su impacto negativo sobre las desigualdades educativas. En los últimos años, organismos internacionales como la OCDE, la UNESCO o el Banco Mundial han mostrado una creciente preocupación por dicho impacto. Sin embargo, la mayoría de estos organismos internacionales no cuestiona directamente la política de APP sino que apuesta por procesos de regulación pública que permitan compatibilizar los supuestos efectos positivos de las APP con mayores niveles de equidad. El presente artículo contribuye al debate internacional sobre la regulación pública de la educación privada subvencionada. Para ello, analizamos las diferentes configuraciones regulativas de las APP que prevalecen en los países de la OCDE, y exploramos los procesos de problematización y de reforma que han acontecido en ellos. El artículo concluye con una reflexión sobre las implicaciones políticas y los límites y desafíos de dichas reformas.
Descargas
Citas
Alegre, M.A., y Ferrer, G. (2010). School regimes and education equity: some insights based on PISA 2006. British Educational Research Journal, 36 (3), 433 – 461.
Angus, M. (2003). School choice policies and their impact on public education in Australia. En D. N. Plank y G. Sykes (Eds.), Choosing Choice: School Choice in International Perspective (pp. 112–141). Nueva York: Teachers College Press.
Baldwin, R., Cave, M., y Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding Regulation. Theory, Strategy, and Practice (2n edition). Oxford, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press.
Barman, J. y Edwards, G. (2009). Private school. En The Canadian Encyclopedia. Toronto: Historica Foundation of Canada.
Baum, D.R. (2018). The effectiveness and equity of public-private partnerships in education: A quasi-experimental evaluation of 17 countries. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26, 105.
Baum, D., Lewis, L., Lusk-Stover, O., y Patrinos, H. (2014). What Matters Most for Engaging the Private Sector in Education: A Framework Paper. (SABER. Working Paper Series, number 8). World Bank Group.
Belfield, C.R., y Levin, H.M. (2002). The effects of competition between schools on educational outcomes: A review for the United States. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 279-341.
Bellei, C. y Cabalin, C. (2013). Chilean student movements: Sustained struggle to transform a market-oriented educational system. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 15(2), 108–123.
Bellei, C. y Muñoz, G. (2021). Models of regulation, education policies, and changes in the education system: a long-term analysis of the Chilean case. Journal of Educational Change.
Bellei, C. (2016). Dificultades y resistencias de una reforma para des-mercantilizar la educación. Revista de Sociología de la Educación, 9(2), 232–247.
Black, J. (2002). Critical Reflections on Regulation. Londres, Reino Unido: Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation at the London School of Economics and Political Science.
Bosetti, L. y Gereluk, D. (2016). Understanding School Choice in Canada. Toronto, Canadá: University of Toronto Press.
Bulkley, K. (2005). Understanding the charter school concept in legislation: The cases of Arizona, Michigan and Georgia». International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18 (4), 527-554.
Bulkley, K. y Fisler, J. (2003). A decade of charter schools: From theory to practice. Educational Policy, 17(3), 317–342.
Caldwell, B. J. (2010). Is private schooling becoming the preferred model of school choice in Australia? Journal of School Choice, 4(4), 378–397.
Calero, J. y Bonal, X. (1999). Poli?tica educativa y gasto pu?blico en educacio?n: aspectos teo?ricos y una aplicacio?n al caso espan?ol. Barcelona, España: Pomares-Corredor.
Cantillon, E. (2011). School Choice Regulation in Practice: Lessons from Antwerp, Brussels and Ghent (Manuscrito inédito). Disponible en: https://rethinkingbelgium.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Cantillon.pdf
Cantillon, E. (2013). Mixité sociale : le rôle des procédures d’inscription scolaire. En P. Maystadt, E. Cantillon, L. Denayer, P. Pestieau, B. Van der Linden y M. Cattelain (Eds.), Le modèle social belge: quel avenir? (pp. 847–864). Charleroi, Bélgica: Éditions de l’Université Ouverte.
Carrasco, A. y Honey, N. (2019) Nuevo Sistema de Admisión Escolar y su capacidad de atenuar la desigualdad de acceso a colegios de calidad: al inicio de un largo camino (Estudios en Justicia Educacional, 1). Santiago, Chile: Centro Justicia Educacional.
Chakrabarti, R., (2008). Can increasing private school participation and monetary loss in a voucher program affect public school performance? Evidence from Milwaukee. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 1371–1393.
Chubb, J. E y Moe T. T. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
CIRES. (2017). The Socio-Economic Status (SES) Score Methodology Used in Recurrent School Funding Arrangements. Melbourne, Australia: Centre for International Research on Education Systems/Victoria University.
Coldron, J., Tanner, E., Finch, S., Shipton, L., Wolstenholme, C., Willis, B., Demack, S. y Stiell, B. (2008). Secondary school admissions (Research Report DCSF-RR020). Londres, Reino Unido: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
Cox, C. (2003). Las políticas educacionales de Chile en las últimas dos décadas del siglo XX. En C. Cox (Ed.), Políticas educacionales en el cambio de siglo: La reforma del sistema escolar de Chile (pp. 73–146). Santiago, Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
Danhier, J. y Friant, N. (2019). Assessing local socioeconomic desegregation: The effects of successive decrees regulating school choice in the Belgian French-speaking community. European Educational Research Journal, 18(2), 248–268.
De Groof, J. (2004). Regulating school choice in Belgium’s Flemish Community. En P. J. Wolf, S. Macedo, D. J. Ferrero y C. Venegoni (Eds.), Educating Citizens: International Perspectives on Civic Values and School Choice (pp. 157–186). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
De Rynck, S. (2005). Regional autonomy and education policy in Belgium. Regional & Federal Studies, 15(4), 485–500.
Delvaux, B. y Maroy, C. (2009). De?bat sur la re?gulation des inscriptions scolaires en Belgique francophone: ou? se situent les de?saccords? (Les Cahiers de Recherche? en E?ducation et Formation, nu?m. 68). Louvain-la-Neuve, Bélgica: GIRSEF/CPU – Universite? catholique de Louvain.
Donnelly, K. (2012). School choice in Australia: An overview of the rules and facts. Journal of School Choice, 6(2), 290–294.
Dumay, X., y Dupriez, V. (2014). Educational quasi-markets, school effectiveness and social inequalities. Journal of Education Policy, 29(4), 510-531.
Dupriez, V., Barbana, S. y Verhoeven, M. (2018). Structural and Systemic Dimensions of School Segregation in French-speaking Belgium. En X. Bonal y C. Bellei (Eds.), Understanding School Segregation. Patterns, Causes and Consequences of Spatial inequalities in education (pp. 45–64). Londres, Reino Unido: Bloomsbury Academic.
Dupriez, V., y Maroy, C. (2003). Regulation in school systems: A theoretical analysis of the structural framework of the school system in French-speaking Belgium. Journal of Education Policy, 18(4), 375– 392.
Education Commission of the States. (2020). Charter schools: How is the funding for a charter school determined? (50-S Com). Disponible en: http://ecs.force.com/mbdata/mbquestNB2C?rep=CS1716
Eurydice. (2016). Teachers’ and School Heads’ Salaries and Allowances in Europe – 2015/16. Luxemburgo: Publications Office of the European Union.
Eurydice (2020). Equity in school education in Europe: Structures, policies and student performance. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Exley, S. (2017). A Country on its way to full privatisation? Private schools and school choice in England. En T. Koinzer, R. Nikolai y F. Waldow (Eds.), Private Schools and School Choice in Compulsory Education. Global Change and National Challeng (pp. 31–47). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Fourcade-Gourinchas, M. y Babb, S. L. (2002). The rebirth of the liberal creed: Paths to neoliberalism in four countries. American Journal of Sociology, 108(3), 533–579.
Fowler, F. C. (1992). School choice policy in France: Success and limitations. Educational Policy, 6(4), 429–443.
Friant, N. (2016). NESET Country Report: Belgium (Manuscrito inédito). Disponible en: https://halshs.archives- ouvertes.fr/halshs-01392996
Gómez Caballero, P. (2016). Las relaciones laborales del personal docente en la enseñanza privada concertada. Temas Laborales: Revista Andaluza de Trabajo y Bienestar Social, 135, 393–431.
Gorard, S., Siddiqui, N., y See, B. H. (2021). The difficulties of judging what difference the Pupil Premium has made to school intakes and outcomes in England. Research Papers in Education, 36(3), 355–379.
Hoxby, C.M. (2003). School choice and school competition: Evidence from the United States. Swedish Eco- nomic Policy Review, 10, 9-65.
Hsieh, C. T., y Urquiola, M. (2006). The Effects of Generalized School Choice on Achievement and Stratifica- tion: Evidence from Chile’s Voucher Program. Journal of Public Economics, 90 (8): 1477–1503.
James, E. (1984). Benefits and costs of privatized public services: Lessons from the Dutch educational system. Comparative Education Review, 28(4), 605–624.
Lambrechts, B. y Geurts, E. (2008). Educational Policies that Address Social Inequality, Country Report: BELGIUM/Flanders. Bruselas: EPASI.
Levi-Faur, D. (2011). Regulation and regulatory governance. En D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Handbook on the Politics of Regulation (pp. 3–21). Cheltenham, UK / Northampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Levin H. M., Cornelisz, I. y Hanisch-Cerda, B. (2013). Does educational privatisation promote social justice? Oxford Review of Education, 39(4), 514–532.
Ley 20845. (2015). Ley de inclusión escolar que regula la admisión de los y las estudiantes, elimina el financiamiento compartido y prohíbe el lucro en establecimientos educacionales que reciben aportes del Estado. Disponible en: https://www.bcn.cl/leychile/navegar?idNorma=1078172
Lodge, M., y Wegrich, K. (2012). Managing regulation: Regulatory analysis, politics and policy. London, Reino Unido: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lundahl, L. (2002). Sweden: Decentralization, deregulation, quasi-markets – and then what?. Journal of Education Policy, 17(6), 687–697.
Macpherson, I., Robertson, S., y Walford, G. (Eds.). (2014). Education, Privatisation and Social Justice: Case Studies from Africa, South Asia and South East Asia. Oxford, Reino Unido: Symposium Books.
Maussen, M. y Vermeulen, F. (2015). Liberal equality and toleration for conservative religious minorities. Decreasing opportunities for religious schools in the Netherlands? Comparative Education, 51(1), 87–104.
Meuret, D. (2004). School choice and its regulation in France. En P. J. Wolf, S. Macedo, D. J. Ferrero y C. Venegoni (Eds.), Educating Citizens: International Perspectives on Civic Values and School Choice (pp. 238–267). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Ministe?re de la Fe?de?ration Wallonie-Bruxelles - Direction des Relations Internationales. (2016). Examen de l’OCDE des politiques pour un usage plus efficace des ressources scolaires. Rapport pays. Bruselas: Ministe?re de la Fe?de?ration Wallonie-Bruxelles.
Mizala, A., y Torche, F. (2012). Bringing the schools back in: the stratification of educational achievement in the Chilean voucher system. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(1), 132-144.
Moumné, R., y Saudemont, C. (2015). Overview of the role of private providers in education in light of the existing international legal framework. Investments in private education: undermining or contributing to the full development of the human right to education? (Working Papers on Education Policy, 01). Paris, France: UNESCO.
Muñoz, G. y Weinstein, J. (2019). The difficult process in Chile: Redefining the rules of the game for subsidized private education. En C. Ornelas (Ed.), Politics of Education in Latin America. Reforms, Resistance and Persistence (pp. 72–100). Leiden, Países Bajos: Brill.
Murillo, F. J., Belavi, G., y Pinilla, L. M. (2018). Segregacio?n escolar pu?blico-privada en Espan?a. Papers. Revista de Sociologia, 103(3), 307–337.
National Council on Disability. (2018). Every Student Succeeds Act and Students with Disabilities. Disponible en: https://ncd.gov/sites/default/files/NCD_ESSA-SWD_Accessible.pdf
Nusche, D., Miron, G., Santiago, P. y Teese, R. (2015). OECD Reviews of School Resources: Flemish Community of Belgium 2015. París, Francia: OECD Publishing.
Nusche, D., Radinger, T., Falch, T. y Shaw, B. (2016). OECD Reviews of School Resources: Denmark. París, Francia: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2011). Private schools: Who benefits? (PISA in Focus 7). París, Francia:: OEC Publishing.
OECD (2012). Public and Private Schools: How Management and Funding Relate to their Socio-economic Profile. París, Francia: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2013). Synergies for Better Learning: An International Perspective on Evaluation and Assessment. París, Francia: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2014). When is Competition Between Schools Beneficial? (PISA in Focus, No. 42). París, Francia: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2015). Improving Schools in Sweden: An OECD Perspective. París, Francia: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2017). School choice and school vouchers: An OECD perspective. París, Francia: OECD Publishing.
Olsen, T.V. (2015). The Danish free school tradition under pressure. Comparative Education, 51(1), 22–37.
Patrinos, H. A. (2013). Private education provision and public finance: The Netherlands. Education Economics, 21(4), 392–414.
Peters, D. y Walraven, G. (2011) The Netherlands: Interventions to counteract school segregation. En J. Bakker, E. Denessen, D. Peters y G. Walraven (Eds.), International Perspectives on Countering School Segregation (pp. 131–150). Amberes: Garant.
Podgursky, M. (2006). Teams versus bureaucracies: Personnel policy, wage-setting, and teacher quality in traditional public, charter, and private schools. Education Working Paper Archive. Disponible en: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509018
Pons, X., van Zanten, A. y Da Costa. S. (2015). The national management of public and Catholic schools in France: Moving from a loosely coupled towards an integrated system? Comparative Education, 51(1), 57–70.
Rizvi, F. (2016). Privatization in education: Trends and consequences. (Education Research and Foresight Working Papers, 18). París, Francia: UNESCO.
Roberts, N. y Danechi, S. (2019). FAQs: Academies and Free Schools (Briefing Paper, 07059). Londres, Reino Unido: House of Commons Library.
Rogero-García, J. y Andrés-Candelas, M. (2014). Gasto público y de las familias en educación en España: diferencias entre centros públicos y concertados. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 147(1), 121–130.
Rouse, C. E., y Barrow, L. (2009). School vouchers and student achievement: Recent evidence and remaining questions. Annual Review of Economics, 1(1), 17-42.
Rouw, R., Fuster, M., Burns, T. y Brandt, M. (2016). United in diversity: A complexity perspective on the role of attainment targets in quality assurance in Flanders (OECD Working Papers, 139). París, Francia: OECD Publishing.
Sahlgren. G. H. (2016). Regulation and Funding of Independent Schools. Lessons from Sweden. Vancouver, Canadá: Fraser Institute.
Schindler-Rangvid, B. (2008). Private school diversity in Denmark’s national voucher system. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(4), 331–354.
Sierens, S., Mahieu, P. y Nouwen, W. (2011). The desegregation policy in Flemish primary education: Is distributing migrant students among schools an effective solution? En J. Bakker, E. Denessen, D. Peeters y G. Walraven (Eds.), International Perspectives on Countering School Segregation (pp. 151–171). Amberes, Bélgica: Garant.
Skinner, R. R. (2014). Charter School Programs Authorized by the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA Title V-B): A Primer. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
Teyssier, R. (2011). The organizational and electoral determinants of the provincial funding of private education in Canada: A quantile regression analysis. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 44(4), 829–857.
The Abidjan Principles (2019). Guiding Principles on the human rights obligations of States to provide public education and to regulate private involvement in education. Disponible en: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c2d081daf2096648cc801da/t/5dc414bb9f409d285dc9abf2/1573131454068/Online+version_A4_WEB_COUV%2BTEXTE_THE-ABIDJAN-PRINCIPLES_Nov_2019.pdf
Thomsen, J. (2017). Charter School Accountability Under ESSA. Denver, Colorado: Education Commission of the States.
UNESCO (2015b). Rethinking Education. Towards a global common good? París, Francia: UNESCO.
UNESCO (2017). Global Education Monitoring Report 2017/18. Accountability in education: meeting our commitments. París, Francia: UNESCO.
UNESCO (2021a). Global Education Monitoring Report 2021/2. Non-state actors in education: who chooses? who loses?. París, Francia: UNESCO.
UNESCO (2021b). How committed? Unlocking financing for equity in education (Policy Paper, 44). París, Francia: UNESCO.
United Nations (2015). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to education (A/70/342). Retrieved from: https://undocs.org/A/70/342
UOE (2019). UOE data collection on formal education. Manual on concepts, definitions and classifications. UNESCO-UIS/OECD/EUROSTAT.
Van Pelt, D., Hasan, S. y Allison, D. J. (2017). The Funding and Regulation of Independent Schools in Canada. Vancouver, Canadá: Fraser Institute.
Vandenberghe, V. (1999). Combining market and bureaucratic control in education: An answer to market and bureaucratic failure? Comparative Education, 35(3), 271–282.
Vega-Bayo, A. y Mariel, P. (2018). School choice across different regions of Spain. Hacienda Pu?blica Espan?ola / Review of Public Economics, 227(4), 11–36.
Vergari, S. (2007). The politics of charter schools. Educational Policy, 21(1), 15–39.
Verger, A., Fontdevila, C. y Zancajo, A. (2016). The privatization of education: A political economy of global education reform. Nueva York: Teachers College Press.
Vermeulen, B. P. (2004). Regulating school choice in order to promote civic values: Constitutional and political issues in the Netherlands. En P. J. Wolf y S. Macedo (Eds.), Educating Citizens. International Perspectives on Civic Values and School Choice (pp. 31–66). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Villarroya, A. (2000). La financiacio?n de los centros concertados. Madrid: Ministerio de Educacio?n, Cultura y Deporte; Centro de Investigacio?n y Documentacio?n Educativa.
Villarroya, A. (2003). La financiación pública de la enseñanza privada no universitaria en España. Revista de Educación, 330, 187–204.
Vlaams Ministerie van Onderwijs en Vorming. (2020). Erkenning, financiering en subsidiëring van scholen. Disponible en: https://data-onderwijs.vlaanderen.be/edulex/document.aspx?docid=9284#2
Waitoller, F. R. (2020). Excluded by Choice: Urban Students with Disabilities in the Education Marketplace. Nueva York: Teachers College Press.
Waitoller, F. R., Nguyen, N. y Super, G. (2019). The irony of rigor: “No-Excuses” charter schools at the intersections of race and disability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(3), 282–298.
Walford, G. (2003). Separate schools for religious minorities in England and the Netherlands: Using a framework for the comparison and evaluation of policy. Research Papers in Education, 18(3), 281–299.
Waslander, S., Pater, C., & Weide, M. van der. (2010). Markets in Education: An Analytical Review of Empirical Research on Market Mechanisms in Education. (OECD Education Working Paper Series, No 52). París, Francia: OECD Publishing.
Welner, K., y Howe, K. (2005). Steering toward separation: The policy and legal implications of “counselling” special education students away from choice schools. En J. Scott (Ed.), School Choice and Student Diversity: What the Evidence Says (pp. 93–111). Nueva York: Teachers College Press.
West, A. (2017). Private schools in Sweden: Policy development, inequalities and emerging issues. En T. Koinzer, R. Nikolai y F. Waldow (Eds.), Private Schools and School Choice in Compulsory Education (pp. 67–79). Wiesbaden, Alemania: Springer VS.
West, A. y Bailey, E. (2013). The development of the academies program- me: “Privatising” school-based education in England 1986-2013. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(2), 137-159.
West, A. y Currie, P. (2008). The role of the private sector in publicly funded schooling in England: Finance, delivery and decision making. Policy & Politics, 36(2), 191–207.
West, A. y Nikolai, R. (2017). The expansion of “private” schools in England, Sweden and Eastern Germany: A comparative perspective on policy development, regulation, policy goals and ideas. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(5), 452–469.
West, A., Barham, E., y Hind, A. (2011). Secondary school admissions in England 2001 to 2008: Changing legislation, policy and practice. Oxford Review of Education, 37(1), 1–20.
Wiborg, S. (2014, 9 de septiembre). The big winners from Sweden’s for-profit ‘free’ schools are companies, not pupils. The Conversation. Disponible en: https://theconversation.com/the-big-winners-from-swedens-for-profit-free-schools-are-companies-not-pupils-29929
Wiborg, S. (2015). Privatizing education: Free school policy in Sweden and England. Comparative Education Review, 59(3), 473–497.
Woessmann, L. (2005). Public-private partnerships in schooling: Cross-country evidence on their effectiveness in providing cognitive skills. (Research Paper PEPG, 05-09). Program on Education Policy and Governance.
World Bank. (2017). World Development Report 2018: Learning to realize education promise. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
Zancajo, A. (2019a). Drivers and hurdles to the regulation of education markets: The political economy of Chilean reform (National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education Working Paper 239). Nueva York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Zancajo, A. (2019b). Education markets and schools’ mechanisms of exclusion: The case of Chile. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(130).