No. 14 (2021): Teaching skills, digitization and inclusion: Keys to achieving Sustainable Development Goal 4 in times of pandemic.
Monographic

IMPACT ON THE POST-COVID PERIOD OF DIGITALIZATION POLICIES IN EDUCATION ADOPTED IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Ángel Alija Alija
UNED
Published 20 December 2021

Keywords:

digital teaching skills, online teaching, education policy consolidation, European integration, Principal Component Analysis
How to Cite
Alija Alija, Ángel. (2021). IMPACT ON THE POST-COVID PERIOD OF DIGITALIZATION POLICIES IN EDUCATION ADOPTED IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. Journal of Supranational Policies of Education (JoSPoE), (14), 21–42. Retrieved from https://revistas.uam.es/jospoe/article/view/14039

Abstract

This article examines the impact of previous exposure to online teaching experiences, the digital teaching skills, the working environment and the technological infrastructure of schools on the success of the implementation of educational policies that promote the intensive use of new technologies. Furthermore, through the application of data mining techniques, we examine the capacity of the constructed indicators of prior digital training of the schools and of the success of the actions adopted to ensure educational attention to act as predictors of the acceptance and consolidation of the solutions adopted in the post-covid period. A comparative study is also made of the position of European Union and OECD countries in terms of the digital readiness of schools and the digital learning environment of pupils. All this has made it possible to illustrate the starting point for the development of the actions adopted in the EU in this area, as well as to emphasize the need to guarantee their adequate projection at country, regional, local and even school level, in order to successfully overcome the high degree of heterogeneity within the EU.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. (2010). Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(4), 433–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101

Azzone, G., & Soncin, M. (2020). Factors driving university choice: a principal component analysis on Italian institutions. Studies in Higher Education, 45(12), 2426–2438. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1612354

Bergenfeld, I., Jackson, E. C., & Yount, K. M. (2021). Creation of the gender-equitable school index for secondary schools using principal components analysis. International Health, 13(2), 205–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihaa032

Comisión Europea (2020a). Comunicado de prensa: la Comisión Europea pone en marcha una consulta pública sobre un nuevo Plan de Acción de Educación Digital. Recuperado de https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_1066.

Comisión Europea (2020b). La Consulta Pública Abierta (OPC) sobre el Plan de Acción de Educación Digital 2021-2027. Recuperado de https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12453-Digital-Education-Action-Plan/public-consultation.

Comunicación de la Comisión al Parlamento Europeo, al Consejo, al Comité Económico y Social Europeo y al Comité de las Regiones. Brújula digital 2030: el camino europeo para la década digital (COM/2021/118 final). 9 de marzo de 2021.

Comunicación de la Comisión al Parlamento Europeo, al Consejo, al Comité Económico y Social Europeo y al Comité de las Regiones relativa a la consecución del Espacio Europeo de Educación de aquí a 2025 (COM/2020/625 final). 30 de septiembre de 2020.

Comunicación de la Comisión al Parlamento Europeo, al Consejo, al Comité Económico y Social Europeo y al Comité de las Regiones. Plan de Acción de Educación Digital. Adaptar la educación y la formación para la era digital (COM/2020/624final). 30 de septiembre de 2020.

Comunicación de la Comisión al Parlamento Europeo, al Consejo, al Comité Económico y Social Europeo y al Comité de las Regiones. Configurar el futuro digital de Europa (COM/2020/67 final). 19 de febrero de 2020.

Comunicación de la Comisión al Parlamento Europeo, al Consejo, al Comité Económico y Social Europeo y al Comité de las Regiones sobre el Plan de Acción de Educación Digital (COM/2018/22 final). 17 de enero de 2018.

Comunicación de la Comisión al Parlamento Europeo, al Consejo, al Comité Económico y Social Europeo y al Comité de las Regiones. Reforzar la identidad europea mediante la Educación y la Cultura Contribución de la Comisión Europea a la reunión de dirigentes en Gotemburgo el 17 de noviembre de 2017 (COM/2017/0673 final). 14 de noviembre de 2017

Granat, K. (2018). Subsidiarity as a Principle of EU Governance. In Globalisation and Governance (pp. 273–304). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417027.012

Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA “effect” in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802412669

Grek, S. (2016). Acteurs de connaissances et la construction des nouveaux panoramas du gouvernement: Le cas de la Direction Générale de l’Éducation et de la Culture de la Comission Européene. Educacao e Sociedade, 37(136), 707–726. https://doi.org/10.1590/ES0101-73302016166099

Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J. A. (2018). Lessons Learned from PISA: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Articles on the Programme for International Student Assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258726

Jollife, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments. In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences (Vol. 374, Issue 2065). Royal Society of London. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202

Jones, P. W. (2007). Education and world order. Comparative Education, 43(3), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060701556273

Kargol-Wasiluk, A., & Wildowicz-Giegiel, A. (2018). The quality of public finance in the light of fiscal governance concept: implications for the European Union countries. Equilibrium, 13(3), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.020

Lagona, F., & Padovano, F. (2007). A nonlinear principal component analysis of the relationship between budget rules and fiscal performance in the European Union. Public Choice, 130, 401–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9095-z

Lange, B., & Alexiadou, N. (2007). New Forms of European Union Governance in the Education Sector? A Preliminary Analysis of the Open Method of Coordination. European Educational Research Journal, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.4.321

Lange, B., & Alexiadou, N. (2010). Policy learning and governance of education policy in the EU. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680931003782819

Lozares Colina, C., & López Roldán, P. (1991). El análisis de componentes principales: aplicación al análisis de datos secundarios. Papers. Revista de Sociologia, 37(0), 31. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v37n0.1595

Michel, A. (2017). The contribution of PISA to the convergence of education policies in Europe. European Journal of Education, 52(2), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12218

Nouri, J., Ebner, M., Ifenthaler, D., Saqr, M., Malmberg, J., Khalil, M., Bruun, J., Viberg, O., Conde González, M. Á., Papamitsiou, Z., & Berthelsen, U. D. (2019). Efforts in Europe for Data-Driven Improvement of Education – A Review of Learning Analytics Research in Seven Countries. International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education (IJAI), 1(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijai.v1i1.11053

OECD (2020a). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020. OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19), OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/6ae21003-en.

OECD (2020b). PISA 2018 Results (Volume V): Effective Policies, Successful Schools. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/ca768d40-en.

OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en.

Pepín, L. (2007). La educación en el proceso de construcción europea: un ejemplo único de aplicación del principio de subsidiariedad. Revista de educación nº 343 mayo-agosto 2007, pp. 601-620. https://sede.educacion.gob.es/publiventa/la-educacion-en-el-proceso-de-construccion--europea-un-ejemplo-unico-de-aplicacion-del-principio-de-subsidiariedad/lenguas/23561.

Pons, X. (2017). Fifteen years of research on PISA effects on education governance: A critical review. European Journal of Education, 52(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12213

Resolución del Consejo relativa a un marco estratégico para la cooperación europea en el ámbito de la educación y la formación con miras al Espacio Europeo de Educación y más allá 2021-2030 (2021/C 66/01). 26 de febrero de 2021.

Sin, K., & Muthu, L. (2015). "APPLICATION OF BIG DATA IN EDUCATION DATA MINING AND LEARNING ANALYTICS – A LITERATURE REVIEW ". ICTACT Journal on Soft Computing, 05(04), 1035–1049. https://doi.org/10.21917/ijsc.2015.0145

Terrón, A. M., Leiva Olivencia, J. J., & Franco Caballero, P. D. (2020). Big data irruption in education. Pixel-Bit, Revista de Medios y Educacion, 57, 59–90. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2020.i57.02

Venera, C., Nicolae, C., Albu, N., Iulia, R. & Petre, S. (2020). Online Teaching Practices and the Effectiveness of the Educational Process in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(55), 920–936.

Volante, L., & Ritzen, J. (2016). The European Union, education governance and international education surveys. Policy Futures in Education, 14(7), 988–1004. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316652009

Webster, T. J. (2001). A principal component analysis of the U.S. News & World Report tier rankings of colleges and universities. Economics of Education Review, 20(3), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7757(99)00066-7

Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. In Learning, Media and Technology (Vol. 45, Issue 2, pp. 107–114). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641