EL PAPEL DE LA OCDE EN LA DIFUSIÓN INTERNACIONAL DE POLÍTICAS EDUCATIVAS: EL CASO DE LA AUTONOMÍA ESCOLAR CON RENDICIÓN DE CUENTAS
Palabras clave:
autonomía escolar, rendición de cuentas, evaluaciones externas, mecanismos de gobernanza, organizaciones internacionales, OCDE, PISAResumen
La OCDE ha desempeñado un papel activo en la construcción y la difusión de la autonomía escolar con rendición de cuentas (SAWA por sus siglas en inglés) como un modelo internacional de política educativa. Como mostramos en este artículo, lo ha hecho activando tres mecanismos de gobernanza, a saber, la recolección de datos, la evaluación de las políticas educativas y la generación de ideas sobre políticas. La OCDE ha desempeñado un papel proactivo en la teorización de las políticas SAWA, adaptando este modelo a una amplia gama de problemas y enmarcándolo de manera suficientemente flexible para acomodar diferentes preferencias políticas. En gran medida, el potencial de la OCDE para promover el cambio educativo reside, por un lado, en su capacidad de articular creencias causales y creencias normativas en la generación de políticas y, por el otro, en su capacidad de abrir ventanas de oportunidad a través de las que introducir sus recomendaciones de políticas, como las políticas SAWA, en debates educativos nacionales.Descargas
Citas
Baek, C., Hörmann, B., Karseth, B., Pizmony-Levy, O., Sivesind, K., y Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2018). Policy learning in Norwegian school reform: A social network analysis of the 2020 incremental reform. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 4(1), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2017.1412747
Baxter, J. A. (2014). An independent inspectorate? Addressing the paradoxes of educational inspection in 2013. School Leadership & Management, 34(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2013.856294
Baxter, J., y Clarke, J. (2013). Farewell to the tick box inspector? Ofsted and the changing regime of school inspection in England. Oxford Review of Education, 39(5), 702-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.846852
Béland, D., y Howlett, M. (2016). How solutions chase problems: Instrument constituencies in the policy process. Governance, 29(3), 393-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12179
Berten, J., y Leisering, L. (2017). Social policy by numbers. How international organisations construct global policy proposals. International Journal of Social Welfare, 26(2), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12246
Beyeler, M. (2004). Introduction: a comparative study of the OECD and European welfare states. En K. Armingeon & M. Beyeler (Eds.), The OECD and European Welfare States (pp. 1-12). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bloem, S. (2015). The OECD directorate for education as an independent knowledge producer through PISA. En H. G. Kotthoff & E. Klerides (Eds.), Governing Educational Spaces (pp. 169-185). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-265-3_10
Bravo, J. (2011). SIMCE: Pasado, presente y futuro del sistema nacional de evaluación. Estudios Públicos, 123, 189-211.
Breakspear, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance, (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 71). Paris: OECD Publishing.
*Burns, T., y Köster, F. (2016). Educational Research and Innovation Governing Education in a Complex World. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264255364-en
Camphuijsen, M. K., Møller, J., & Skedsmo, G. (2020). Test-based accountability in the Norwegian context: exploring drivers, expectations and strategies. Journal of Education Policy, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1739337
Cariola, L., Covacevich, C., Gubler, J., Lagos, E., y Ortiz, M. (2011). Chilean participation in IEA Studies, En: Papanastasiou, C., Plomp, T., y Papanastasiou, E. (Eds.), IEA 1958-2008: 50 Years of Experiences and Memories (pp. 373-388). Nicosia: Cultural Center of Kykkos Monastery.
Carvalho, L. M., y Costa, E. (2017). Avaliação externa das escolas em Portugal: Atores, conhecimentos, modos de regulação. Revista Brasileira de Política e Administração Da Educação, 33(3), 685-705. https://doi.org/10.21573/vol33n32017.79302
Centeno, V. G. (2017). The OECD's educational agendas - Framed from above, fed from below, determined in interaction. A study on the recurrent education agenda. Berlin: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b12774
Checkel, J. T. (2005). International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization, 59(4), 801-826. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050289
Cussó, R., y d'Amico, S. (2005). From development comparatism to globalization comparativism: Towards more normative international education statistics. Comparative Education, 41(2), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060500037012
De Grauwe, A. (2005). Improving the quality of education through school-based management: learning from international experiences. International Review of Education, 51(4), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-005-7733-1
Dobbins, M., y Christ, C. (2019). Do they matter in education politics? The influence of political parties and teacher unions on school governance reforms in Spain. Journal of Education Policy, 34(1), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1406153
Echávarri, J., y Peraza, C. (2017). Modernizing schools in Mexico: The rise of teacher assessment and school-based management policies. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(90), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2771
Engel, L. C. (2015). Steering the national: Exploring the education policy uses of PISA in Spain. European Education, 47(2), 100-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2015.1033913
Fernandez-Cano, A. (2016). A methodological critique of the PISA evaluations. Relieve, 22(1), 1-16.
Gough, D., Thomas, J., y Oliver, S. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews, 1(28), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28
Gorur, R. (2013). My school, my market. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 214-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.770248
Gorur, R. (2015). Producing calculable worlds: Education at a glance. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(4), 578-595. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.974942
Gorur, R. (2017). Towards productive critique of large-scale comparisons in education. Critical Studies in Education, 58(3), 341-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1327876
Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA effect in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802412669
Grek, S. (2016, September). Beyond the standardisation vs. contextualisation debate: The role of the OECD in European education governance. Paper presented at the International Organizations and the Globalization of Public Instruments and Ideas (IOGLOB) Seminar, Strasbourg.
Grek, S. (2017). Socialisation, learning and the OECD's Reviews of National Policies for Education: The case of Sweden. Critical Studies in Education, 58(3), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1337586
Grimaldi, E., y Serpieri, R. (2014). Italian education beyond hierarchy: Governance, evaluation and headship. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 42(4S), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213510501
Halton, M. J. (2003). Benchmarking: Another attempt to introduce market-oriented policies into Irish second-level education? Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 11(3), 331-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360300200178
Harris, A., y Jones, M. S. (2016). International Comparisons: Critique, Culture and Context. En: Harris, A., y Jones, M. S. (Eds.), Leading Futures: Global Perspectives on Educational Leadership (pp. 1-10). London: Sage.
Hatch, T. (2013). Beneath the surface of accountability: Answerability, responsibility and capacity-building in recent education reforms in Norway. Journal of Educational Change, 14(2), 113-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-012-9206-1
Holloway, J. (2019). The OECD's campaign for distributed leadership: The risks of peddling more accountability and teacher responsibility. En: Ydesen, C. (Ed.), The OECD's historical rise in education: The formation of a global governing complex (pp. 199-217). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33799-5_10
Krejsler, J. B. (2019). How a European 'Fear of Falling Behind' Discourse Co-Produces Global Standards: Exploring in- and outbound performativity of the transnational turn in European education policy. En Ydesen, C. (Ed.), The OECD's historical rise in education (pp. 245-267): The formation of a global governing complex. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33799-5_12
Kamens, D. H. (2013). Globalization and the emergence of an audit culture: PISA and the search for 'best practices' and magic bullets. En Meyer, H. D., & Benavot, A. (Eds.), PISA, power and policy: The emergence of global educational governance, (pp. 117-140). London: Symposium Books.
Kauko, J., Rinne, R., y Takala, T. (Eds.). (2018). Politics of quality in education. A comparative study of Brazil, China, and Russia. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203712306
Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co.
Lewis, S. (2019). Historicising new spaces and relations of the OECD's global educational governance: PISA for Schools and PISA4U. En Ydesen, C. (Ed.), The OECD's historical rise in education: The formation of a global governing complex (pp. 269-289). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33799-5_13
Marcussen, M. (2004). Multilateral surveillance and the OECD: Playing the idea game. In K. Armingeon & M. Beyeler (Eds.), The OECD and European welfare states (pp. 13-31). Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Martens, K. (2007). How to become an influential actor - The "comparative turn" in OECD education policy. En K. Martens, A. Rusconi, & K. Lutz (Eds.), Transformations of the state and global governance (pp. 40-56). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-58271-6_3
Martens, K., y Jakobi, A. P. (2010). Introduction: The OECD as an actor in international politics. In K. Martens & A. P. Jakobi (Eds.), Mechanisms of OECD governance: International incentives for national policy-making? (pp. 1-25). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591145.003.0001
Martens, K., y Niemann, D. (2013). When do numbers count? The differential impact of the PISA rating and ranking on education policy in Germany and the US. German Politics, 22(3), 314-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2013.794455
Martino, W., y Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013). "Gap talk" and the global rescaling of educational accountability in Canada. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 589-611. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.767074
McNamara, G., O'Hara, J., Boyle, R., & Sullivan, C. (2009). Developing a culture of evaluation in the Irish public sector: the case of education. Evaluation, 15(1), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389008095492
Møller, J., y Skedsmo, G. (2013). Modernising education: New Public Management reform in the Norwegian education system. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(4), 336-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2013.822353
Moos, L. (2014). Educational governance in Denmark. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 424-443 https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2014.945655
Morgan, C. (2009). The OECD Programme for International Student Assessment: Unravelling a Knowledge Network. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag.
Niemann, D., y Martens, K. (2018). Soft governance by hard fact? The OECD as a knowledge broker in education policy. Global Social Policy, 18(3), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018118794076
Niemann, D., Martens, K., & Teltemann, J. (2017). PISA and its consequences: Shaping education policies through international comparisons. European Journal of Education, 52(2), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12220
*OECD. (2005). School Accountability and Transparency of Information. Informal Meeting of OECD Education Ministers. Directorate for Education. EDU(2005)4
*OECD. (2007). OECD's PISA survey shows some countries making significant gains in learning outcomes, press release. Recuperado de: http://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/oecdspisasurveyshowssomecountriesmakingsignificantgainsinlearningoutcomes.htm
*OECD. (2008). System accountability and the quality and equity of schooling outcomes. Recent work and issues for discussion. Directorate for Education. EDU/EDPC(2008)16.
*OECD. (2010). Reviews of national policies for education: Santa Catarina State, Brazil. Paris: OECD Publishing.
*OECD. (2011a). Improving lower secondary schools in Norway 2011, Reviews of national policies for education. Paris: OECD Publishing
*OECD. (2011b). PISA in Focus, No. 9. School autonomy and accountability: Are they related to student performance? Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/5k9h362kcx9w-en https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9h362kcx9w-en
*OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. Paris: OECD.
*OECD (2016). Education in Colombia, Reviews of national policies for education. Paris: OECD Publishing,
*OECD. (2017). Education in Costa Rica, Reviews of national policies for education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
*OECD. (2018). Education for a bright future in Greece, Reviews of national policies for education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Ougaard, M. (2010). The OECD's global role: Agenda?setting and policy diffusion. En K. Martens & A. P. Jakobi (Eds.), Mechanisms of OECD governance: International incentives for national policy-making? (pp. 25-49). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591145.003.0002
Pagani, F. (2002). Peer review as a tool for co-operation and change: An analysis of an OECD working method. African Security Review, 11(4), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2002.9628141
Pagès, M., y Prieto, M. (2020). Re-contextualizing Global Education Policies and Reforming Education Through Policy Instruments: Evidence From Spain. Working paper, Barcelona: GEPS.
Pal, L. A. (2009, July). The OECD and global public management reform. Paper presented at the 21st World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Santiago de Chile.
Papadopoulos, G.S. (1994). Education 1960-1990: The OECD perspective (OECD Historical Series). Paris: OECD.
Parcerisa, L., & Falabella, A. (2017). La consolidación del Estado evaluador a través de políticas de rendición de cuentas: Trayectoria, producción y tensiones en el sistema educativo. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(89), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.3177
Popp, M. (2014). New Culture, Old System-Reactions to Internationalization in Spanish Education Policy. In: Martens, K., & Knodel, P. (Eds.), Internationalization of education policy: A new constellation of statehood in education? (pp. 163-178). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137401694_7
Porter, T., y Webb, M. (2007, November). The role of the OECD in the orchestration of global knowledge networks. Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Meeting, Montreal.
Rutkowski, D. (2018). Improving international assessment through evaluation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(1), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1300572
Schleicher, A., y Zoido, P. (2016). The policies that shaped PISA, and the policies that PISA shaped. In K. Mundy, A. Green, & B. Lingard (Eds.), Handbook of global education policy (pp. 374-384). Hoboken: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118468005.ch20
Schuller, T. (2005). Constructing international policy research: The role of CERI/OECD. European educational research journal, 4(3), 170-180. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2005.4.3.2
Sellar, S., y Lingard, B. (2013). The OECD and global governance in education. Journal of Education Policy,28(5), 710-725. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.779791
Sellar, S., Thompson, G., y Rutkowski, D. (2017). The global education race: Taking the measure of PISA and international testing. Place of publication: Brush Education.
Sjøberg, S. (2016). OECD, PISA, and globalization: The influence of the international assessment regime. In C.H. Tienken & C. A. Mullen (Eds.), Education policy perils: Tackling the tough issues. New York: Routledge.
Starr, K. (2014). The influences and implications of PISA: An Australian perspective, AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 10(4), 19-30.
Verger, A., y Curran, M. (2014). New public management as a global education policy: Its adoption and re-contextualization in a Southern European setting. Critical Studies in Education, 55(3), 253-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2014.913531
Verger, A., Prieto, M., Pagès, M., y Villamor, P. (2020). Common standards, different stakes: A comparative and multi-scalar analysis of accountability reforms in the Spanish education context. European Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118785556