Palabras clave:
Híbridos, seres compuestos, aniconismo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Resumen
Cuál es el origen y la funcionalidad de las criaturas hibridas en el Irán preislámico si tradicionalmente se ha considerado el escenario religioso iranio como anicónico. La imaginería del IV y III milenio a.C. responde a un sustrato común que explica la pervivencia de ciertos arquetipos míticos y el proceso cognitivo, permitiendo ciertas analogías entre la Edad del Bronce y el periodo sasánida.
Descargas
Citas
Agostini, D., 2019, “Half-human and Monstrous Races in Zoroastrian Tradition” en Journal of the American Oriental Society 139.4, pp. 805-819.
Aston, E., 2011, Mixanthrôpoi: Animal-human hybrid deities in Greek religion, Liège.
Boyce, M., 1975a, A History of Zoroastrianism. The Early Period, Leiden.
Boyce, M., 1975b, “Iconoclasm among the Zoroastrians” en Christianity, Judaism, and other Greco-Roman cults: studies for Morton Smith at sixty, pp. 93-111.
Compareti, M., 2009/2010, “Holy Animals” of Mazdeism in Iranian Arts: Ram, Eagle and Dog” en N?me-ye. Ir?n-e Bast?n 9/1-2, pp. 27-42.
Duchesne-Guillemin, J., 2002, “ANTHROPOMORPHISM” Encyclopædia Iranica, disponible en https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/anthropomorphism
De Jong, A., 2015, “Going, going, gone! The fate of the demons in late Sasanian and early Islamic Zoroastrianism” en P. Swennen (ed.), Démons iraniens: Actes du colloque international organisé à l’Université de Liège les 5 et 6 février 2009 à l’occasion des 65 ans de Jean Kellens, pp. 163-170.
Ehrenberg, E., 2017, “ACHAEMENID VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF ROYAL FIGURES” Encyclopædia Iranica, disponible en http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/achaemenid-visual-reps
Francfort, H-P., 1994, “The Central Asian dimension of the symbolic system in Bactria and Margiana”, Antiquity, 68 (259), pp. 406-418.
Heródoto 2000, Historias, C. Schrader (ed.), Madrid.
Lissner, I., 1961, Man, God and Magic, New York.
Maiden, B. E., 2020, Cognitive Science and Ancient Israelite Religion. New Perspectives on Texts, Artifacts, and Culture, Cambridge, pp. 133-176.
McMahon, A., 2022, “Composite Human-Animal figures in Early Urban Northern Mesopotamia: Shamans or Images of Resistance?” Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 41, pp. 23-251.
Pittman H., 2014, “Hybrid Imagery and Cultural Identity in the Bronze Age of Exchange: Halil River Basin and Sumer meet”, in C.C. Lamberg Karlovsky, B. Genito and B. Cerasetti (ed.), Margiana, My Life is like the Summer Rose. Papers in honor for Maurizio Tosi for his 70th Birthday, BAR International Series 2690, pp. 625-636.
Poinsot, D., 2022, “How to Create “Administrative” Iconographies? The Bestiary of the Sasanian Glyptic” Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 33 (1), pp. 1-20.
Porada, E., 1995, Man and Images in the Ancient Near East, London.
Shenkar, M., 2014, Intangible Spirits and Graven Images, Leiden.
Shenkar, M., 2015, “Rethinking Sasanian Iconoclasm”, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 135(3), pp. 471-498.
Wiggermann, F. A. M., 1994, ‘Mischwesen. A’ Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie 8, pp. 222-244.
Winkelmann S., 2008, “Animali e mito nel Vicino Oriente Antico: un’analisi attraverso i sigilli” in P. Amiet, C.C. Lamberg Karlovski, G. Ligabue, G. Rossi Osmida (eds.) Animali e mito nel Vicino Oriente Antico, Trebaseleghe, pp. 40-58.
Wittkower, R., 1942, “Marvels of the East. A Study in the History of Monsters” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, vol. 5, pp. 159-197.