No. 23 (2020): Monográfico: Migraciones y fronteras de la justicia
Articles

Questioning the relationship between freedom of association and the right to exclude immigrants: three arguments against Ch.H. Wellman

Daniel Loewe
Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez
Portada del número 23 de Bajo Palabra
Published November 16, 2020

Keywords:

freedom of association, right to exclude, immigrants, Wellman
How to Cite
Loewe, D. (2020). Questioning the relationship between freedom of association and the right to exclude immigrants: three arguments against Ch.H. Wellman. Bajo Palabra, (23), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.15366/bp.2020.23.007

Abstract

States claim and mutually recognize the right to exclude potential immigrants at their own discretion. From a liberal perspective, the justification for this exclusion is not obvious. Wellman argues that this right is justified on the ground of freedom of association: just as a club can discriminate in its associative terms, so can the State. This article criticizes this argument and argues that the underlying analogy is wrong. On the one hand, States are not like clubs, and clubs are not like states. The first ones follow the logic of the private law, the second ones the logic of the public law. To argue in favor of such an analogy leads to implausible consequences. On the other hand, if freedom of association is the basis of the argument, it does not follow the right of states to exclude potential immigrants, but the right of world citizens to associate across national borders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1980. Social Justice in the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale U.P.

Anderson, Elizabeth S. 1999. "What Is the Point of Equality?". Ethics 109: 287-337. https://doi.org/10.1086/233897

Barry, Brian. 2000. Culture and Equality. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bauer, Otto. 1907. Die Nationalitätenfrage und die Sozialdemokratie. Viena: Verlag der Wiener Volksbuchhandlung Ignaz Brand.

Carens, Joseph. 1987. "Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders". Review of Politics 49 (2): 251-273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500033817

Cassee, Andreas. 2016. Globale Bewegungsfreiheit. Berlín: Suhrkamp/M.

Colers, Avery. 2009. Land, Conflict and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575709

Dummett, M. 2001. On Immigration and Refugees. Londres: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203465516

Dworkin, Gerald. 1988. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625206

Dworkin, Ronald. 1981. "What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources". Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (4): 283-345.

Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U.P.

Fine, Sarah. 2010. "Freedom of Association Is Not the Answer". Ethics 120: 338-356. https://doi.org/10.1086/649626

Greenawalt, Kent. 1998. "Freedom of Association and Religious association", en Freedom of Association, ed. A. Gutmann. Princeton: Princeton U.P. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691219387-006

Hirschman, Albert. 1990. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. MA: Harvard U.P.

Kateb, George. 1998. "The value of association", en Freedom of Association, ed. A. Gutmann. USA: Princeton U.P. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691219387-003

Klosko, George y Wall, Steven (eds.). 2003. Perfectionism and Neutrality. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.

Kukathas, Chandran. 1992. "Are there any cultural rights?". Political theory 20 (1): 105-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591792020001006

Kukathas, Chandran. 1997. Cultural toleration. En Nomos XXIX: Ethnicity and Group Rights, eds. I. Shapiro & W. Kymlicka, Will, 69-104. Nueva York: New York U.P.

Kukathas, Chandran. 2003. The Liberal Archipelago. Nueva York: Oxford U.P. https://doi.org/10.1093/019925754X.001.0001

Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford U.P. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198290918.001.0001

Loewe, Daniel. 2004. "Konsoziationaler Föderalismus und die Identitätspolitik". En Globale Gerechtigkeit, ed. J-C. Merle. Fromman-Holzboog.

Loewe, Daniel. 2007. "Inmigración y el Derecho de Gentes de John Rawls". Revista de Ciencia Política 27 (2): 23-48. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2007000300002

Loewe, Daniel. 2010. "Los náufragos de nuestro tiempo". Arbor, 186 (744): 555-570. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2010.744n1217

Loewe, Daniel. 2012. "Obligaciones de justicia. Open borders o justicia distributiva". Arbor 188 (755): 475-488. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2012.755n3002

Loewe, Daniel. 2012b. "La utopía multicultural". Rev.Inter.Mob. 38: 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-85852012000100004

Loewe, Daniel. 2018. "Justicia distributiva, comunidades nacionales, inmigrantes y fronteras abiertas". Anales del Instituto Chile 37: 35-73.

Loewe, Daniel. 2020. "Cuando la libertad importa: inmigrantes y movilidad libre". Estudios Públicos 157: 7-46. https://doi.org/10.38178/cep.vi157.3

Loewe, Daniel & Schwember, Felipe. 2020b. "¿Tolerancia o autonomía? Dos utopías liberales de la sociedad: Kukathas y Kymlicka". Trans/Form/Ação: Revista de Filosofia [en prensa].

Meisels, Tamar. 2009. Territorial Rights. Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9262-6

Miller, David. 1995. On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford U.P.

Miller, David. 2000. Citizenship and National Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Miller, David. 2011. "Territorial rights: concept and justification". Political Studies: 1-17.

Miller, David. 2016. Stranger in Our Midst. Cambridge: Harvard U.P. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674969827

Moore, Margaret. 2015. A Political Theory of Territory. Oxford: Oxford U.P. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190222246.001.0001

Myers, Brendan. 2013. Time and the Land. Quebec: Northwest Passage Books.

Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Nueva York: Basic Books.

O'Neil, Onora. 2000. Bounds of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.

Pevnick, Ryan. 2011. Immigration and the Constraints of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.

Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. Nueva York: Columbia U.P.

Rawls, John. 1999a. A Theory of Justice (revised edition). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard U.P.

Rawls, John. 1999b. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard U.P.

Stilz, Anna. 2019. Territorial Sovereignty. Oxford: Oxford U.P. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833536.001.0001

Tan, Kok-Chor. 2012. Justice, Institutions, and Luck. Oxford: Oxford U.P. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588855.001.0001

Taylor, Charles. 1994. "The Politics of Recognition". En Multiculturalism, ed. A. Gutmann, 25-73. Princeton: Princeton U.P.

Velasco, Juan Carlos. 2016. El azar de las fronteras. México: FCE.

Walzer, Michael. 1984. Spheres of Justice. Nueva York: Basic Books.

Wellman, Christopher Heath. 2008. "Immigration and Freedom of Association". Ethics 119: 109-141. https://doi.org/10.1086/592311

Wellman, Christopher Heath. 2005. A Theory of Secession. The Case of Political Self-Determination. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.

Wellman, Christopher Heath y Cole, Phillip. 2011. Debating the Ethics of Immigration. Is there a Right to exclude? Oxford: Oxford U.P. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199731732.001.0001