Keywords:
EU, Double Citizenship, Political Theory, Nationalism, CosmopolitanismAbstract
The EU represents an institutional and ontological novelty that raises conceptual challenges to political theory. Indeed, the EU is key to understanding the civil and political community of the 21st century, suitable for the globalized world. Yet, the European project, and its main civic achievement, that is, Union citizenship, faces deep challenges in light of nationalist and populist discourses expanding all across Europe, as the case of the so-called Brexit shows. This articles aims at highlighting the political singularity of the EU and underlining the challenges it poses to political theory, stressing the reach and shortcomings of Union citizenship.Downloads
References
ANHEIER, HELMUT K., MARY KALDOR Y MARLIES GASIOUS, eds., Global Civil Society 2005/6. Londres, SAGE Publications,
BECK, ULRICH, Was ist Globalisierung? Irrtümer des Globalismus – Antworten auf Globalisierung. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1997.
BECK, ULRICH, Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006.
BECK, URLICH Y EDGAR GRANDE, Cosmopolitan Europe. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2007.
BELLAMY, RICHARD Y DARIO CASTIGLIONE, “Three Models of Democracy, Political Community and Representation in the EU”, Journal of European Public Policy, 20:2 (2013), 206-223.
BELLAMY, RICHARD, “An Ever Closer Union among the Peoples of Europe: Republican Intergovernmentalism and Demoicratic Representation within the EU, Journal of European Integration, Vol. 35, Num. 5 (2013), 419-516.
BENHABIB, SEYLA, The Rights of Others. Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
BENHABIB, BENHABIB, IAN SHAPIRO Y DANILO PATRONOVIC, eds., Identities, Affiliations, and Allegiancies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
BENHABIB, SEYLA, Another Cosmopolitanism. Robert Post, ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006.
BURGESS, MICHAEL, Federalism and the European Union: The Building of Europe, 1950-2000. Londres, Routledge, 2000.
CASTELLS, CASTELLS, The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. I. Cambridge, MA, Oxford, UK, Blackwell, 1997.
CHENEVAL, FRANCIS Y F. SCHMMELFENNIG, “The Case for Demoi-cracy in the European Union, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51, Num. 2 (2013), 334-350.
CHENEVAL, FRANCIS, S. LAVENEX Y F. SCHMMELFENNIG, “Demoi-cracy in the European Union: Principles, Institutions, Policies, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 22, Num. 18 (2015), 1-18.
CASTALDI, ROREBERTO, “A Federalist Framework Theory on European Integration”, Centro Studi Federalismo, 2007,1-93.
Comisión Europea, EU Citizenship Report 2013. Bruselas, 2013, http://ec.europa.eu/justice/citizen/files/2013eucitizenshipreport_en.pdf (17/10/2014).
COSTA, OLIVER, “The Coming of Age of the European Parliament”, Journal of European Integration, 8 de marzo de 2017, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07036337.2017.1297021 (08/03/2017).
DOSENRODE, SOREN,“Federalism Theory and Neo-functionalism: Elements for an Analytical Framework”, Perspectives on Federalism, Vol. 2, Issue 3 (2010), 1-28.
ELAZAR, DANIEL J., Exploring Federalism. Londres, The University of Alabama Press, 1987.
FABBRINI, MARIO, “Transatlantic Constitutionalism: Comparing the United States and the European Union”, European Journal of Political Research, 43 (2004), 547-569.
FABBRINI, MARIO, “The European Multilevel System for the Protection of Fundamental Rights: A ‘Neo-Federalist Perspective’”, Jean Monnet Working Paper, 15/10 (2010).
FRIEDMAN, THOMAS L., The World is Flat. A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York, Picador-Farrar, Straus y Giroux, 2005.
HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, Die postnationale Konstellation: Politische Essays. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp Verlag, 1998.
HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, The Lure of Technocracy. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2015.
HELD, DAVID Y ANTHONY MCGREW, Globalization/Anti-Globalization. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2002.
HELLSTRÖM, ANDERS, Bringing Europe Down to Earth. Lunds Universtet, 2006.
KALDOR, MARY KALDOR, Global Civil Society An Answer to War. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003.
KEANE, JOHN, ¿Global Civil Society? Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
KOCHENOV, DIMITRY, “The Essence of EU Citizenship Emerging from the Last Ten Years of Academic Debate: Beyond the Cherry Blossoms and the Moon?”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol 62, Núm. 1 (2013), 97-136.
KOCHENOV, DIMITRY, “The Citizenship of Personal Circumstances in Europe”, Questioning EU Citizenship. Judges and the Limits of Free Movement and Solidarity in the EU, en Daniel Thym, ed. Oxford y Portland, Oregon, Bloomsbury, 2017, 51-81.
KOSTAKOPOULOU, DORA, “Ideas, Norms and European Citizenship: Explaining Institutional Change”, Modern Law Review, 68 (2) (2005), 233-267.
KOSTAKOPOULOU, DORA, “European Union Citizenship: Writing the Future”, European Law Journal, Vol. 13, Num. 5 (2007), 623-646.
LACEY, JOSEPH, “Conceptually Mapping the European Union: A Demoi-cratic Analysis”, Journal of European Integration, Vol. 38, Num. 1 (2016), 61-77.
MAAS, WILLEM, “The Origins, Evolution and Political Objectives of EU Citizenship”, German Law Journal, Vol. 15, Num. 5 (2014), 797-820.
MAAS, WILLEM, “European Governance of Citizenship and Nationality”, Journal of Contemporary European Research, Vol. 12, Num. 1 (2016), 533-551.
NICOLAÏDIS, KALYPSO, “Pragmatism, Idealism and European Demoicracy”, Social Europe Journal, 15 de julio de 2013, https://www.socialeurope.eu/2013/07/pragmatism-idealism-and-european-democracy/ (15/03/2017).
NICOLAÏDIS, KALYPSO, “The Idea of a European Demoi-cracy”, Philosophical Foundations of European Union, J. Dickinson y P. Eleftheriadis, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, 247-274.
PRAINO, DIEGO, “A New System of Government? Defining the Confidence Relationship of the EU Model”, Journal of European Integration, 01 de Febrero de 2017, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07036337.2017.1281264 (08/03/2017).
PUKALLUS, STEFANIE, Representations of European Citizenship since 1951. Londres, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
SHAW, JO, “The Interpretation of European Union Citizenship”, The Modern Law Review, 61, 3 (1998), 293-317.
SCHMIDT, VIVIEN, “Democratizing the Eurozone”, Social Europe Journal, 5 de mayo de 2013, en línea: http://www.social-europe.eu/2012/05/democratizing-the-eurozone/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+social-europe%2FwmyH+%28Social+Europe+Journal%29 (21/05/2013).
SCHMIDT, SUSAN K., “Extending Citizenship Rights and Losing it All: Brexit and the Perils of ‘Over-Constitutionalisation’”, en Questioning EU Citizenship. Judges and the Limits of Free Movement and Solidarity in the EU, Daniel Thym, ed. Oxford y Portland, Oregon, Bloomsbury, 2017, 28-51.
SCHMITTER, PHILIPPE, “What Is There to Legitimize in the European Union...and How Might This be Accomplished?”, European University Institute (enero 2001), en-línea: http://www.eui.eu/Documents/Departments-Centres/SPS/Profiles/Schmitter/LegitimizeEU.pdf, (08/11/2012).
SCHMITTER, PHILIPPE Y ALEXANDER H. TRESCHEL, coords., “The Future of Democracy in Europe: Trends, Analysis and Reforms”. A Green Paper for the Council of Europe. Council of Europe, 2007, en línea http://www.thefutureofrepresentativedemocracy.org/files/pdf/resources/schmitter_thefutureofDemocracyinEurope.pdf (09/11/2012).
SCHUMAN, ROBERT, Declaración de Robert Schuman, 9 de mayo de 1950, accesible en línea https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/symbols/europe-day/schuman-declaration_es (05/05/2018).
THYM, DANIEL, “Introduction: The Judicial Deconstruction of Union Citizenship”, en Questioning EU Citizenship. Judges and the Limits of Free Movement and Solidarity in the EU, Daniel Thym, ed. Oxford y Portland, Oregon, Bloomsbury, 2017,10-27.
WOLLENSCHLÄGER, FERDINAND, “Consolidating Union Citizenship: Residence and Solidarity Rights for Jobseekers and the Economically Inactive in the Post-Dano Era”, en Questioning EU Citizenship. Judges and the Limits of Free Movement and Solidarity in the EU, Daniel Thym, ed. Oxford y Portland, Oregon, Bloomsbury, 2017, 210-232.