Núm. 18 (2018)
Lógica, Filosofía de la Ciencia y del Lenguaje / Logic, Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Language

Aulus Gellius and the semantic analysis of possibilities // Aulo Gelio y el análisis semántico de posibilidades

Miguel López-Astorga
Universidad de Talca, Chile
Publicado noviembre 12, 2018
Cómo citar
López-Astorga, M. (2018). Aulus Gellius and the semantic analysis of possibilities // Aulo Gelio y el análisis semántico de posibilidades. Bajo Palabra, (18). https://doi.org/10.15366/bp2018.18.021

Resumen

Resumen

La teoría de los modelos mentales establece que el pensamiento humano es principalmente semántico y que consiste en análisis de las posibilidades a las que las sentencias hacen referencia. La teoría tiene un gran apoyo empírico. No obstante, se puede pensar que, si realmente muestra cómo la mente humana opera, debería ser posible hallar textos antiguos escritos por filósofos o lógicos cuyos argumentos revelen identificaciones y comparaciones de posibilidades semánticas. En este trabajo, trato de argumentar que, efectivamente, se pueden encontrar textos de este tipo en las fuentes antiguas. En concreto, comento un fragmento de Aulo Gelio en el que está claro que se realiza un análisis de posibilidades.

Palabras clave: modelos mentales, posibilidades, razonamiento, semántica

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Barnes, J., Bobzien, S., & Mignucci, M. (2008). Logic. In K. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld, & M. Schofield (Eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy (pp. 77-225). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bobzien, S. (1996). Stoic syllogistic. In C. C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy (pp. 133-192). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

Bocheński, I. M. (1963). Ancient Formal Logic. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.

Boeri, M. D. & Salles, R. (2014). Los filósofos estoicos. Ontología, lógica, física y ética. Santiago de Chile, Chile: Ediciones Universidad Alberto Hurtado.

Braine, M. D. S. & O'Brien, D. P. (Eds.) (1998). Mental Logic. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603005

Byrne, R. M. J. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2009). "If" and the problems of conditional reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13(7), 282-287.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.003

Gentzen, G. (1934). Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen I. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 39(2), 176-210.

Gentzen, G. (1935). Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen II. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 39(3), 405-431.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201363

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2004). The history of the mental models. In K. Manktelow & M. C. Chung (Eds.), Psychology and Reasoning: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives (pp. 179-212). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2006). How We Reason. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2010). Against logical form. Psychologica Belgica, 5(3/4), 193-221.

https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-50-3-4-193

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2012). Inference with mental models. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 134-145). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2015). How to improve thinking. In R. Wegerif, L. Li, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking (pp. 80-91). Abingdon, UK, & New York, NY: Routledge.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review, 109(4), 646-678.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.646

Khemlani, S., Lotstein, M., Trafton, J. G., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2015). Immediate inferences from quantified assertions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(10), 2073-2096.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1007151

Khemlani, S., Orenes, I., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2012). Negation: A theory of its meaning, representation, and inference. Psychological Review, 109(4), 646-678.

Khemlani, S., Orenes, I., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2014). The negation of conjunctions, conditionals, and disjunctions. Acta Psychologica, 151, 1-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.004

López-Astorga, M. (2015a). Evolved mechanisms versus underlying conditional relations. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 40(53), 241-253.

https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2015-0012

López-Astorga, M. (2015b). Chrysippus' indemonstrables and mental logic. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 15(43), 1-15.

López-Astorga, Miguel (2016). The problem of arity in Stoic logic: The case of the disjunction. Thémata. Revista de Filosofía, 54, 233-246

https://doi.org/10.12795/themata.2016.i54.12

Lukasiewicz, J. (1967). On the history of the logic of propositions. In S. McCall (Ed.), Polish Logic: 1920-1939 (pp. 67-87). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

Mueller, I. (1978). An introduction to Stoic logic. In J. M. Rist (Ed.), The Stoics (pp. 1-26). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Oakhill, J. & Garnham, A. (Eds.) (1996). Mental Models in Cognitive Science. Essays in Honour of Phil Johnson-Laird. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

O'Brien, D. P. (2009). Human reasoning includes a mental logic. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 96-97.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09000429

O'Brien, D. P. (2014). Conditionals and disjunctions in mental-logic theory: A response to Liu and Chou (2012) and to López-Astorga (2013). Universum, 29(2), 221-235.

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-23762014000200015

O'Brien, D. P. & Li, S. (2013). Mental logic theory: A paradigmatic case of empirical research on the language of thought and inferential role semantics. Journal of Foreign Languages, 36(6), 27-41.

O'Brien, D. P. & Manfrinati, A. (2010). The mental logic theory of conditional proposition. In M. Oaksford & N. Chater (Eds.), Cognition and conditionals: Probability and Logic in Human Thinking (pp. 39-54). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233298.003.0002

Orenes, I. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2012). Logic, models, and paradoxical inferences. Mind & Language, 27(4), 357-377.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2012.01448.x

O'Toole, R. R. & Jennings, R. E. (2004). The Megarians and the Stoics. In M. D. Gabbay & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic, Volume I. Greek, Indian and Arabic Logic (pp. 397-522). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-5857(04)80008-6

Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. Burks (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Quelhas, A. C. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2017). The modulation of disjunctive assertions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(4), 703-717.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1154079

Quelhas, A. C., Rasga, C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2017). A priori true and false conditionals. Cognitive Science, 41(55), 1003-1030.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12479