una Carla Lonzi: a Feminist Critique to Sexual Difference in Hegel’s Ethical State
Keywords:
Hegel, feminism, Carla Lonzi, sexual differenceCopyright (c) 2022 Silvia Locatelli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Within contemporary philosophical discourse we find different thinkers that, with the aim to criticize Western dominant thought, by them addressed as ‘phallocentric’, directly refer to Hegelian texts. This paper will present one author who have openly spoken out a feminist critique of Hegelian thought, and in particular of the sexual division described by the Stuttgart philosopher, culminating in the ethical state – representing the constitution of the modern state – with the confinement of the feminine within the domestic sphere and, conversely, the liberation of the masculine within community political life.
The thinker who will be analyzed is the Italian activist and philosopher Carla Lonzi, author of the renowned Sputiamo su Hegel (Let’s Spit on Hegel) and precursor of the Italian sexual difference feminism. The author confronted the political division implemented by Hegel within the ethical state between the two sexes, trying to show how Hegel’s work strongly contributed to the constitution of the patriarchal symbolic order still in force in Western thought. The fundamental point of the author’s thought is, in fact, the conviction that the symbolic and linguistic structures of Western culture are something deeply rooted and, therefore, very complex to change. This helps us to understand why in Europe, despite the implementation of various legislative changes – such as, for example, the establishment of anti-violence centers, the recognition of gender violence at a legal level, the sanctions against gender discrimination in the workplace – the patriarchal dynamics typical of Western thought are changing too slowly (when they are): gender violence is the order of the day, the pay gap is far from being healed, and, above all, the division of gender roles between care work and productive work is still strongly present.
This text, therefore, seeks to demonstrate that the philosophical scope that accompanied the formation of European thought also characterized its darker features, including the patriarchal perspective. Here, we will analyze a particular aspect of patriarchy, focusing on its elaboration within Hegelian political philosophy: the presumed ontological and biological/natural destination of the female to domestic work and the male to public life.
To this end, the article is divided into two parts. In the first part, the concept of sexual difference as developed by Hegel will be presented, analyzing its development within the three parts of his philosophical system. In the second part, a part of Lonzi’s thought will be briefly analyzed, to then articulate her critique of the Hegelian division of gender roles.
Downloads
References
BENHABIB, S., «On Hegel, Women and Irony», en JAGENTOWICZ MILLS, P. (ed.), Femi- nist Interpretations of G.W.F. Hegel, Penn State University Press, Pensilvania, 1996.
BOCCIA, M., L’io in rivolta. Vissuto e pensiero di Carla Lonzi, La Tartaruga, Milano, 1990.
CESARINO, C. y RIGHI, A., «Introduction: Another Mother, Another Introduction», en CE- SARINO, C. y RIGHI, A. (eds.), Another mother. Diotima and the symbolic order of Ita- lian feminism, University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota, 2018.
ZAMBONI, C., Diotima: An Outline. Disponible en: https://www.diotimafilosofe.it/wp-con- tent/uploads/2015/04/DIOTIMA-AN-OUTLINE-di-Chiara-Zamboni.pdf
ELLENA, L., «Carla Lonzi e il neofemminismo radicale degli anni 70: disfare la cultura, dis- fare la politica», en CONTE, L., FIORINO, V. y MARTINI, V. (eds.), Carla Lonzi: la du- plice radicalità, Edizioni ETS, Pisa, 2011.
FELOJ, S., «Hegel’s Master and Servant Dialectics in the Feminist Debate», en ACHELLA, S., IANELLI, F., BAPTIST, G., FELOJ, S., LI VIGNI y F., MELICA, C. (eds.), The Owl’s Fli- ght. Hegel’s Legacy to Contemporary Philosophy, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2022.
FURLOTTE, W., The Problem of Nature in Hegel’s Final System, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2018.
HEGEL, G. W. F., Elements of the Philosophy of Right, Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 1991.
––––, Encyclopedia Logic, Hackett, Indianapolis, 1991.
––––, Philosophy of Mind, Clarendon Press, Cambridge, 2007.
––––, Philosophy of Nature, Allen & Unwin, London, 1970.
––––, The Science of Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.
IRIGARAY, L., This Sex Which Is Not One, Cornell University Press, New York, 1985.
LONZI, C., Escupamos sobre Hegel y otros escritos, Traficantes de Sueños, Madrid, 2018.
MELANDRI, L., Una Visceralità Indicibile. La pratica dell’inconscio nel movimento delle donne degli anni Settanta, FrancoAngeli, Milano, 2002.
NEUHOUSER, F., Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom, Harvard Uni- versity Press, Cambirdge, 2000.
PATTEN, A., Hegel’s Idea of Freedom, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.
SIANI, A. «Hegel and Europe: preliminary considerations», Hegel-Jahrbuch 2014/1, pp.
-350.
STONE, A., Nature, Ethics and Gender in German Romanticism and Idealism, Rowman & Li- ttlefield, Lanham, 2018.
WOOD, A. W., Hegel’s Ethical Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.