Vol. 20 Núm. 4 (2022)
Artículos

Prácticas Curriculares Hacia la Sostenibilidad y una Pedagogía Transformadora

Carlinda Leite
Biografía
Angélica Monteiro
Biografía
Rita Barros
Biografía
Nicole Ferreira
Biografía
Publicado 27 septiembre 2022

Palabras clave:

ODS, Educación, Pedagogía transformadora, Agenda 2030, Prácticas
Cómo citar
Leite, C., Monteiro, A., Barros, R., & Ferreira, N. (2022). Prácticas Curriculares Hacia la Sostenibilidad y una Pedagogía Transformadora. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia Y Cambio En Educación, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2022.20.4.006

Resumen

En el siglo XXI, organismos internacionales como las Naciones Unidas y la UNESCO señalan el papel de la educación en el desarrollo de competencias para vivir en línea con la sostenibilidad y los objetivos de la Agenda 2030. Las prácticas pedagógicas/curriculares, alineadas con una pedagogía transformadora que moviliza el poder de agencia de los estudiantes, constituyen procedimientos adecuados para la sostenibilidad y el el desarrollo de estos objetivos. A través de un cuestionario, se recogieron datos sobre las prácticas pedagógicas/curriculares de 20 profesores de Dinamarca, Chipre, Portugal, Italia, Letonia y la República de Macedonia del Norte, que pertenecen a un proyecto europeo orientado a la sostenibilidad y el desarrollo de competencias. El análisis de las prácticas reveló que el pensamiento crítico fue una de las competencias más desarrolladas. Aunque los profesores valoraron los aspectos de aprendizaje de los temas sociales y las estrategias que conducen al cuestionamiento reflexivo, se subestimó el poder de agencia de los estudiantes. Considerando que estas prácticas fueron estimuladas por la pertenencia a un proyecto, el estudio mostró la necesidad de continuar proyectos basados ??en una pedagogía transformadora que alienten a los docentes a valorar prácticas pedagógicas/curriculares que desarrollen el poder de agencia de los estudiantes.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Biesta, G. (2003). Learning from Levinas: A response. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 22, 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021137611436

Crowley, A., & Moxon, D. (2018). New and innovative forms of youth participation in decision-making processes. Council of Europe Youth Department.

Delors, J. (1996). Learning: The treasure within. UNESCO.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE.

Elo, S., Kaarianinen, M., Kanste, O., Polkki, R., Utriainen, K., & Kyngas, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633

Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogia do oprimido [Pedagogy of the oppressed]. Afrontamento.

Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). Towards a new end: New pedagogies for deep learning. Collaborative Impact.

Gaard, G., Blades, J., & Wright, M. (2017). Assessing sustainability curriculum: From transmissive to transformative approaches. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(7), 1263-1278. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-11-2015-0186

Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2004). The seven principles of sustainable leadership. Educational Leadership, 61(7), 8-13.

Hart, T. (2004). Opening the contemplative mind in the classroom. Journal of Transformative Education, 2(1), 28-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344603259311

Hart, T. (2008). Interiority and education: Exploring the neurophenomenology of con-templation and its potential role in learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 6(4), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344608329393

Kopnina, H., & Cherniak, B. (2016). Neoliberalism and justice in education for sustainable development: A call for inclusive pluralismo. Environmental Education Research, 22(6), 827-841. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1149550

Leavy, P., & S. Hesse-Biber, S. N. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of emergent methods. Guilford Press.

Leicht, A., Combes, B., Byun, W. J., & Agbedahin, A. V. (2018). From Agenda 21 to Target 4.7: The development of ESD. In A. Leicht, J. Heiss, & W. J. Byun (Eds.), Issues and trends in education for sustainable development (pp. 25-38). UNESCO.

Leite, C., Fernandes, P., & Figueiredo, C. (2018). Challenges of curricular contextualisation: Teachers’ perspectives. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45, 435-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0271-1

Leite, C., Fernandes, P., & Figueiredo, C. (2019). National curriculum vs curricular contextualisation: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Studies, 46(3), 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1570083

Martínez Bonafé, J., & Rogero Anaya, J. (2021). El entorno y la innovación educativa [The context and educational innovation]. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 19(4), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2021.19.4.004

Michel, J. O., Holland, L., Ostrow, J., Brunnquell, C., & Sterling, S. (2020). The ideal outcome of education for sustainability: Transformative sustainability learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2020(161), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20380

Mithans, M., Grmek, M., & ?agran, B. (2017). Participation in decision-making in class: Opportunities and student attitudes in Austria and Slovenia. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 7(4), 165-184. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:15229

Monteiro, A., Mouraz, A., & Dotta, L. (2020). Veteran teachers and digital technologies: Myths, beliefs and professional development. Teachers and Teaching, 26(8), 577-587. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.1900809

Moyer, J., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Learning for sustainability: Considering pathways to transformation. Adult Education Quarterly, 70(4), 340-359. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741713620912219

Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice. SAGE.

Orr, D. W. (2004). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect. Island Press.

Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as agents of change: Teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 187-206). Bloomsbury Academic.

Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015a). Teacher agency: What is it and why does it matter? In R. Kneyber & J. Evers (Eds.), Flip the system: Changing education from the bottom up (pp. 134-148). Routledge.

Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015b). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Academic.

Reynolds, R., Notari, M., & Tavares, N. J. (2017). Twenty-first century skills and global education roadmaps. In S. Chu, R. Reynolds, N. Tavares, M. Notari, & C. Lee (Eds.), 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning: From theory to practice (pp. 17-32). Springer Science.

Rieckmann, M. (2018). Learning to transform the world: Key competencies in ESD. In A. Leicht, J. Heiss, & W. J. Byun (Eds.). Issues and trends in education for sustainable development (pp. 39-59). UNESCO.

Rosa, T., & Malacarne, V. (2016). Formação docente e sustentabilidade. Um estudo sobre ambientalização curricular no curso de pedagogia da Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná [Knowledge base for teaching and sustainability. A study about curricular environmentalization on pedagogy course of State University of West Paraná]. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 14(3), 95-107. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2016.14.3.005

Santos, A. C., & Leite, C. (2020). Professor agente de decisão curricular. Uma scriptura em Portugal [The teacher as an agent of curricular decision. A policy in Portugal]. Magis, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 13, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.m13.padc

Schaeffer, S. (2006, May 1-3). Beyond ‘learning to live together’: The key to education for sustainable development [Paper presentation]. UNESCO Expert Meeting on ESD: ‘Reorienting Education to Address Sustainability’. Kanchanaburi, Thailand.

Sterling, S. (2001). Schumacher briefings: Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change. Green Books for the Schumacher Society.

Sterling, S., Dawson J., & Warwick P. (2018). Transforming sustainability education at the creative edge of the mainstream: A case study of Schumacher College. Journal of Transformative Education, 16(4), 323-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344618784375

Torres-Harding, S., Baber, A., Hilvers, J., Hobbs, N., & Maly, M. (2018). Children as agents of social and community change: Enhancing youth empowerment through participation in a school-based social activism project. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 13(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1746197916684643

Ukpokodu, O. N. (2009). Pedagogies that foster transformative learning in a multicultural education course: A reflection. Journal of Praxis in Multicultural Education, 4(1), art 4. https://doi.org/10.9741/2161-2978.1003

UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A global roadmap. UNESCO.

UN. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.

Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. (2011). Key competences in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6, 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6